Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia House Bill HR158

Introduced
2/9/23  
Report Pass
2/16/23  
Introduced
2/9/23  
Enrolled
2/22/23  
Report Pass
2/16/23  
Enrolled
2/22/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Passed
2/22/23  
Report Pass
3/7/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Enrolled
3/9/23  
Report Pass
3/7/23  
Enrolled
3/9/23  
Passed
3/9/23  
Enrolled
4/5/23  
Enrolled
4/5/23  
Chaptered
5/1/23  
Chaptered
5/1/23  

Caption

Property; granting of nonexclusive easements; authorize

Impact

By granting these easements, HR158 aims to streamline the process for utility companies by allowing them to install essential infrastructure without the need for extensive additional legislative approvals. This can expedite the provision of services to state facilities, helping improve operational efficiencies within state-managed properties, including detention centers and educational institutions. However, the oversight by the State Properties Commission remains critical to ensure that such installations do not adversely impact public interests or state-owned properties.

Summary

House Resolution 158 authorizes the granting of nonexclusive easements for the construction, installation, operation, and maintenance of various facilities and utilities on properties owned by the State of Georgia. This includes facilitating projects across multiple counties, such as constructing electrical distribution lines, gas pipelines, and telecommunications infrastructure. The resolution encompasses areas in Bacon, Calhoun, Chatham, Clarke, Fulton, and other counties, thereby providing a framework for advancing necessary state infrastructure enhancements.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HR158 is generally supportive, particularly among utility providers and local governments, as it simplifies the regulatory process. However, there are concerns among advocacy groups regarding the potential for environmental impacts and the preservation of state properties. The discussions have emphasized finding a balance between necessary development and the long-term stewardship of public lands.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the impact of construction activities on local ecosystems and communities. Critics argue that expedited easement approvals could lead to insufficient environmental reviews, thereby risking damage to natural habitats. Conversely, proponents argue that the bill is crucial for modernizing infrastructure and enhancing service delivery across the state, reflecting a pressing need for upgraded facilities aligned with contemporary operational requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

GA HR1113

Property; granting of nonexclusive easements; authorize

GA HR1085

Property; granting of nonexclusive easements; authorize

GA HR98

Property; granting of nonexclusive easements; authorize

TX HB3893

Relating to the modification of a 99-year lease of certain state property to the City of Austin and the grant of a 99-year lease of certain state property and certain easements to the Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

TX SB1838

Relating to the grant of a 99-year lease of certain state property and certain easements to the Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

TX HB902

Relating to the acquisition of real property by an entity with eminent domain authority; requiring an occupational license; authorizing a fee; providing a civil penalty; imposing a criminal penalty.

TX HB2730

Relating to the acquisition of real property by an entity with eminent domain authority and the regulation of easement or right-of-way agents.

TX HB5245

Relating to the acquisition of real property by a private entity with eminent domain authority.