Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia Senate Bill SB223

Introduced
2/21/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Introduced
2/21/23  
Report Pass
2/28/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Engrossed
3/6/23  
Report Pass
2/28/23  
Report Pass
3/14/23  
Engrossed
3/6/23  
Enrolled
4/5/23  
Report Pass
3/14/23  
Chaptered
5/2/23  
Enrolled
4/5/23  
Chaptered
5/2/23  

Caption

Health; reimbursement of patient incurred expenses related to participation in a cancer clinical trial; authorize

Impact

The passage of SB223 is expected to amend existing health laws in Georgia, specifically Chapter 1 of Title 31 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. By requiring sponsors of cancer clinical trials to inform potential participants about reimbursement options for travel and ancillary costs, the bill is set to ensure that financial concerns do not impede patient participation. This is particularly significant for economically disadvantaged patients who may find it challenging to commit time and resources to clinical trials due to travel costs or associated expenses.

Summary

Senate Bill 223 (SB223) introduces provisions to authorize the reimbursement of patient-incurred expenses related to participation in cancer clinical trials. The bill aims to eliminate financial barriers that could prevent patients from enrolling in these potentially life-saving trials. By doing so, SB223 is positioning itself as a measure that promotes wider access to clinical research opportunities for patients, thereby fostering greater equity in healthcare access and support for those battling cancer.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB223 appears to be generally positive, particularly among healthcare advocates and patient support organizations who view it as a necessary step toward enhancing access to innovative cancer treatments. Legislators supporting the bill have indicated their belief in the need for equitable healthcare solutions, highlighting the importance of helping patients overcome the financial hurdles that could limit their participation in clinical trials.

Contention

Despite the overall supportive sentiment, there may be unresolved concerns among some stakeholders regarding the implementation and oversight of reimbursement programs. Critics could argue about the potential for confusion among patients regarding the financial processes or fear that financial inducements, even if deemed appropriate under the bill, might affect informed consent in clinical trials. The discussion surrounding SB223 emphasizes the delicate balance between incentivizing participation and maintaining ethical standards in clinical research.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ HB2759

Municipalities; development; reimbursement zones

CA AB3006

School meals: free or reduced-price meals.

CA AB2381

California state preschool programs: reimbursement rates.

CA AB1283

Mutual aid: reimbursements: volunteer firefighters.

CA AB732

Delta levee maintenance.

CA AB125

Early childhood education: reimbursement rates.

CA AB1429

Behavioral health reimbursement.

CA AB2504

Living Organ Donor Reimbursement Act.