Georgia Senate Bill SB448

Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/24
• Refer: 2/6/24
• Report Pass: 2/13/24
• Engrossed: 2/16/24
• Report Pass: 3/8/24
• Enrolled: 4/2/24
• Chaptered: 5/6/24
• Passed: 5/6/24

Caption

Official Code of Georgia Annotated; revise, modernize, correct errors or omissions in, and reenact the statutory portion of said Code, as amended, in furtherance of the work of the Code Revision Commission

Impact

The implications of SB 448 are primarily administrative, addressing the operations of various state departments, including banking and consumer protection. By revising existing statutes, the bill aims to reduce confusion and improve compliance among citizens and businesses alike. The expected outcome includes a clearer understanding of financial regulations and improved operational effectiveness for financial institutions, ultimately promoting public trust in state governance.

Summary

Senate Bill 448 seeks to revise and modernize the Official Code of Georgia Annotated by correcting various errors and omissions while simplifying its language for better clarity. The bill is part of the ongoing efforts by the Code Revision Commission to ensure that state laws are up-to-date and clear for enforcement. This technical amendment will repeal obsolete sections of the code that are no longer relevant or have been superseded by other legislation, promoting a more coherent legal framework.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 448 appears to be positive among legislators and stakeholders who value clarity and accessibility in legal texts. Supporters argue that modernizing the code reflects a commitment to efficient governance and addresses the needs of contemporary Georgia. However, there are voices concerned about the potential for misinterpretation of the newly revised statutes, emphasizing the need for careful implementation and guidance for both legal practitioners and the public.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the concerns raised by some advocacy groups that changes to the code could unintentionally affect consumer protections or obscure rights that had been previously well-defined. Although the bill is intended to streamline and clarify legal language, critics argue that such revisions could lead to unintended consequences if not carefully regulated. The discussions emphasize the importance of transparency in the amendatory process to ensure that the rights of individuals remain protected.