Georgia 2025-2026 Regular Session

Georgia Senate Bill SB159 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.
OldNewDifferences
11 25 LC 48 1472
22 Senate Bill 159
33 By: Senators Jackson of the 41st and McLaurin of the 14th
44 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
55 AN ACT
66 To amend Title 17 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to criminal procedure,
77 1
88 so as to provide for pretrial proceedings in capital offense cases where the death penalty is2
99 sought when the accused has intellectual disability; to provide for a definition; to provide for3
1010 notice of intent to claim intellectual disability; to provide for pretrial determination of4
1111 intellectual disability; to provide for verdicts; to provide for capital case procedures; to5
1212 provide for reports investigating reversible error; to provide for a standard of review; to6
1313 provide for related matters; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other purposes.7
1414 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF GEORGIA:8
1515 SECTION 1.9
1616 Title 17 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to criminal procedure, is10
1717 amended by adding a new Code section to Part 2 of Article 6 of Chapter 7, relating to11
1818 insanity and mental incompetency, to read as follows:12
1919 "17-7-128.
2020 13
2121 (a) As used in this Code section, the term 'intellectual disability' shall have the same14
2222 meaning as set forth in Code Section 17-7-131.15
2323 S. B. 159
2424 - 1 - 25 LC 48 1472
2525 (b) In criminal cases involving a capital offense for which the death penalty is sought, the16
2626 accused may file a pretrial notice of intent to raise a claim of intellectual disability. Such17
2727 notice shall state that the accused has intellectual disability.18
2828 (c) A pretrial hearing on the issue of whether the defendant has intellectual disability:19
2929 (1) May be conducted upon motion of the defendant, at the discretion of the court; or20
3030 (2) Shall be conducted upon joint consent motion of the defendant and the state to21
3131 proceed with a pretrial hearing to determine if the accused has intellectual disability.22
3232 (d) Such pretrial determination of intellectual disability shall be made by the court sitting23
3333 as the finder of fact.24
3434 (e) The defendant shall have the burden of production and persuasion to demonstrate25
3535 intellectual disability by a preponderance of the evidence and if such pretrial determination26
3636 does not find the defendant to have intellectual disability, he or she shall not be precluded27
3737 from raising such issue in further proceedings.28
3838 (f) If the defendant is found to have intellectual disability, the court shall bar the state from 29
3939 seeking the death penalty. If the court does not find that the defendant has intellectual30
4040 disability, the defendant may raise the issue of his or her alleged intellectual disability as31
4141 set forth in paragraph (2) of subsection (b) of Code Section 17-7-131.32
4242 (g) Either party may seek immediate review of the trial court's determination regarding33
4343 intellectual disability, as provided in subsection (b) of Code Section 5-6-34."34
4444 SECTION 2.35
4545 Said title is further amended by revising subsections (b) and (c) and adding a new paragraph36
4646 to subsection (j) of Code Section 17-7-131, relating to proceedings upon plea of insanity or37
4747 mental incompetency at time of crime, to read as follows:38
4848 "(b)(1) In all cases in which the defense of insanity, mental illness, or intellectual39
4949 disability is interposed, the jury, or the court if tried by it, shall find whether the40
5050 defendant is:41
5151 S. B. 159
5252 - 2 - 25 LC 48 1472
5353 (A) Guilty;
5454 42
5555 (B) Not guilty;43
5656 (C) Not guilty by reason of insanity at the time of the crime;44
5757 (D) Guilty but mentally ill at the time of the crime, but the finding of guilty but45
5858 mentally ill shall be made only in felony cases; or46
5959 (E) Guilty but with intellectual disability, but the finding of intellectual disability shall47
6060 be made only in felony cases.48
6161 (2)(A)
6262 A plea of guilty but mentally ill at the time of the crime or a plea of guilty but 49
6363 with intellectual disability shall not be accepted until the defendant has undergone50
6464 examination by a licensed psychologist or psychiatrist and the court has examined the51
6565 psychological or psychiatric reports, held a hearing on the issue of the defendant's52
6666 mental condition, and is satisfied that there is a factual basis that the defendant was53
6767 mentally ill at the time of the offense or has intellectual disability to which the plea is54
6868 entered.55
6969 (2.1)(B) A plea of not guilty by reason of insanity at the time of the crime shall not be56
7070 accepted and the defendant adjudicated not guilty by reason of insanity by the court57
7171 without a jury until the defendant has undergone examination by a licensed58
7272 psychologist or psychiatrist and the court has examined the psychological or psychiatric59
7373 reports, has held a hearing on the issue of the defendant's mental condition, and the60
7474 court is satisfied that the defendant was insane at the time of the crime according to the61
7575 criteria of set forth in Code Section 16-3-2 or 16-3-3.62
7676 (C) In criminal cases involving a capital offense for which the death penalty is sought63
7777 and a pretrial notice of intent to raise a claim of intellectual disability has been filed, the64
7878 procedure set forth in Code Section 17-7-128 shall be followed.65
7979 (3)(D) In all cases and applicable criminal trials in which the defense of insanity,66
8080 mental illness, or intellectual disability is interposed, the trial judge shall charge the67
8181 jury, in addition to other appropriate charges, the following:68
8282 S. B. 159
8383 - 3 - 25 LC 48 1472
8484 (A)(i) 'I I charge you that should you find the defendant not guilty by reason of69
8585 insanity at the time of the crime, the defendant will be committed to a state mental70
8686 health facility until such time, if ever, that the court is satisfied that he or she should71
8787 be released pursuant to law. law';72
8888 (B)(ii) 'I I charge you that should you find the defendant guilty but mentally ill at the73
8989 time of the crime, the defendant will be placed in the custody of the Department of74
9090 Corrections which will have responsibility for the evaluation and treatment of the75
9191 mental health needs of the defendant, which may include, at the discretion of the76
9292 Department of Corrections, referral for temporary hospitalization at a facility operated77
9393 by the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities. Disabilities';78
9494 and79
9595 (C)(iii) 'I I charge you that should you find the defendant guilty but with intellectual80
9696 disability, the defendant will be placed in the custody of the Department of81
9797 Corrections, which will have responsibility for the evaluation and treatment of the82
9898 mental health needs of the defendant, which may include, at the discretion of the83
9999 Department of Corrections, referral for temporary hospitalization at a facility operated84
100100 by the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities. Disabilities'.85
101101 (c) Except as provided in paragraph (4) of this subsection, In all criminal trials in any of86
102102 the courts of this state wherein an accused shall contend that he or she was insane, mentally87
103103 ill, or intellectually disabled had intellectual disability at the time the act or acts charged88
104104 against him or her were committed, the trial judge shall instruct the jury that they may89
105105 consider, in addition to verdicts of 'guilty' and 'not guilty,' the additional verdicts of 'not90
106106 guilty by reason of insanity at the time of the crime,' 'guilty but mentally ill at the time of91
107107 the crime,' and 'guilty but with intellectual disability.' The defendant may:92
108108 (1) The defendant may be Be found 'not guilty by reason of insanity at the time of the93
109109 crime' if he or she meets the criteria of Code Section 16-3-2 or 16-3-3 at the time of the94
110110 S. B. 159
111111 - 4 - 25 LC 48 1472
112112 commission of the crime. If the court or jury should make such finding, it shall so
113113 95
114114 specify in its verdict.96
115115 (2) The defendant may be
116116 Be found 'guilty but mentally ill at the time of the crime' if the97
117117 jury, or court acting as trier of facts, finds beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant98
118118 is guilty of the crime charged and was mentally ill at the time of the commission of the99
119119 crime. If the court or jury should make such finding, it shall so specify in its verdict.100
120120 (3) Be guilty but with intellectual disability if the jury, or court acting as trier of facts,101
121121 both convicts the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt and finds by a preponderance of102
122122 the evidence that the defendant has intellectual disability. The defendant may be found103
123123 'guilty but with intellectual disability' if the jury, or court acting as trier of facts, finds104
124124 beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the crime charged and is with105
125125 intellectual disability. If the court or jury should make such finding, it shall so specify106
126126 in its verdict.107
127127 (4) After July 1, 2025, when the death penalty has been sought and the defendant108
128128 contends he or she has intellectual disability, the court shall instruct the jury that it shall109
129129 consider whether it finds beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the110
130130 crime charged. If the jury convicts the defendant of such capital crime, the defendant111
131131 shall then present evidence regarding his or her alleged intellectual disability. The State112
132132 shall have the opportunity to present evidence in response, and the defendant may offer113
133133 evidence in rebuttal. Following the presentation of evidence, the court shall instruct the114
134134 jury that if the jury finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant has115
135135 intellectual disability, such jury shall enter a separate finding of 'intellectual disability'116
136136 and so specify in its verdict. If the jury does not find by a preponderance of the evidence117
137137 that the defendant has intellectual disability, such jury shall enter a separate finding of 'no118
138138 intellectual disability.' When the jury returns a finding of 'no intellectual disability,' there119
139139 shall be a capital sentencing proceeding as provided for in Code Section 17-10-30."120
140140 S. B. 159
141141 - 5 - 25 LC 48 1472
142142 "(3) In the trial of any case in which the death penalty is sought which commences on or121
143143 after July 1, 2025, should the judge find in accepting a plea of guilty but with intellectual122
144144 disability, or the jury or court find in its verdict that the defendant is guilty of the crime123
145145 charged but with intellectual disability, the death penalty shall not be imposed and the124
146146 court shall sentence the defendant to imprisonment for life."125
147147 SECTION 3.126
148148 Said title is further amended by revising subsection (d) of Code Section 17-7-171, relating127
149149 to time for a demand for speedy trial in capital cases, discharge and acquittal when no trial128
150150 held before end of two court terms of demand, counting of terms in cases in which death129
151151 penalty is sought, and special pleas of incompetency, as follows:130
152152 "(d) If a defendant files a pretrial notice of intent to raise a claim of intellectual disability131
153153 pursuant to Code Section 17-7-128 or a special plea of incompetency to stand trial pursuant132
154154 to Code Section 17-7-130 or if the court, pursuant to Code Section 17-7-129, conducts a133
155155 trial on the competency of the defendant, the period of time during which such matter is134
156156 pending shall not be included in the computation of determining whether a demand for135
157157 speedy trial has been satisfied."136
158158 SECTION 4.137
159159 Said title is further amended by revising subsection (b) of Code Section 17-10-35.1, relating138
160160 to the review of pretrial proceedings when death penalty is sought, reports investigating139
161161 reversible error, transmittal of reports to Supreme Court, orders regarding review, Attorney140
162162 General assistance, res judicata, applicability, and waiver of rights, as follows:141
163163 "(b) The reports of the trial judge, prosecutor, prosecuting attorney, and defendant under142
164164 subsection (a) of this Code section shall be in the form of standard questionnaires prepared143
165165 and supplied by the Supreme Court. Such questionnaires shall be designed to determine144
166166 S. B. 159
167167 - 6 - 25 LC 48 1472
168168 whether there is arguably any existence of reversible error with respect to any of the
169169 145
170170 following matters: 146
171171 (1) Any proceedings with respect to change of venue; 147
172172 (2) Any proceedings with respect to recusal of the trial judge; 148
173173 (3) Any challenge to the jury array; 149
174174 (4) Any motion to suppress evidence; 150
175175 (5) Any motion for psychiatric or other medical evaluation; and
176176 151
177177 (6) Any proceedings with respect to a pretrial determination of intellectual disability; and152
178178 (6)(7) Any other matter deemed appropriate by the Supreme Court.153
179179 SECTION 5.154
180180 All laws and parts of laws in conflict with this Act are repealed.155
181181 S. B. 159
182182 - 7 -