Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB1909

Introduced
1/24/22  
Refer
1/28/22  
Report Pass
2/10/22  
Refer
2/10/22  
Report Pass
2/18/22  

Caption

Relating To Procurement.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1909 would amend existing procurement statutes, particularly Section 103D-1002 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, to create a bid preference mechanism for banks and credit unions domiciled in Hawaii. The bill would empower the Hawaii state procurement office to prioritize local financial institutions during the selection process for state contracts related to financial services. This shift is intended to strengthen local economic foundations and could potentially lead to increased engagement of local businesses in government contracts, fostering an ecosystem of mutual growth.

Summary

House Bill 1909 focuses on enhancing the State of Hawaii's procurement process by requiring state agencies to prioritize local financial institutions when utilizing financial services. The bill emphasizes that employing local banks or credit unions is essential for directing state resources to support Hawaii's economic infrastructure. This initiative aims to bolster the financial sectors within the state by ensuring that funds spent by the state are reinvested into the local economy, rather than sent to offshore banks, thereby safeguarding Hawaii's financial health.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1909 appears to be largely favorable among supporters who argue that prioritizing local entities is a common-sense strategy to stimulate the local economy. Advocates highlight the importance of keeping state funds circulating within the community, arguing that this legislation will enhance local employment and foster stronger community ties. However, there may be concerns regarding the effectiveness and efficiency of limiting procurement options to local entities, especially if it results in higher costs or reduced competition in the contracting process.

Contention

Notable points of contention may include the potential exclusion of out-of-state financial institutions from participating in state contracts, which could lead to criticisms about reduced competition and potential increases in service costs. Additionally, questions around the ability of local banks or credit unions to meet the diverse and complex needs of state agencies might arise, particularly regarding their capacity and expertise compared to larger national banks. These concerns underscore a critical balance between fostering local economic growth and ensuring that state agencies have access to the best possible services.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1957

Public contracts: best value construction contracting for counties.

CA SB128

Public contracts: Best Value Construction Contracting for Counties Pilot Program.

CA AB2132

California Medical School Tuition for Medical Service Pilot Program.

CA AB356

Los Angeles Community College District: best value procurement: pilot program.

CA AB1981

Los Angeles Unified School District: best value procurement.

CA AB361

Best value procurement: school districts and county offices of education.

CA AB2529

Health care: workforce training programs.

CA SB936

Medi-Cal managed care plans: contracts.