Requesting Hawaiian Electric Company To Conduct A Study To Identify And Remove Any Redundant Utility Poles On Oahu.
The anticipated impact of H.R. 38 on state laws would likely promote improved public safety and community aesthetics. By resolving the issue of double poles, the legislation seeks to eliminate a potential public hazard while enhancing the visual landscape of neighborhoods and business districts. This initiative not only addresses infrastructure inefficiencies but also aligns with broader objectives related to urban planning and community investment. The effort reflects a proactive approach to decentralized utility management and public safety enhancements.
H.R. 38, introduced in the Thirty-first Legislature of Hawaii, focuses on a critical infrastructure issue concerning the removal of redundant utility poles on the island of Oahu. The resolution requests Hawaiian Electric Company to conduct a comprehensive study aimed at identifying these redundant poles, which are often left standing when new poles are installed for transferring electric and communication wires. The necessity for this initiative arises from the aesthetic and safety concerns surrounding clusters of double poles, as well as the risks they pose during severe weather events due to their age and condition.
While the bill appears generally beneficial, potential points of contention could arise regarding the cost and feasibility of conducting such a study and subsequently executing the removal of the poles. Stakeholders may voice concerns about the financial implications for Hawaiian Electric and whether such expenditures align with other pressing utility priorities. There may also be questions regarding the timeline and effectiveness of the proposed reporting requirements, ensuring that Hawaiian Electric provides actionable recommendations and follows through on suggested legislative changes to support the study's findings.