Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB180

Introduced
1/22/21  
Refer
1/22/21  
Refer
2/2/21  
Report Pass
2/12/21  
Refer
2/12/21  
Report Pass
3/5/21  
Engrossed
3/9/21  
Refer
3/11/21  
Report Pass
3/18/21  

Caption

Relating To Deposit Beverage Containers.

Impact

The implications of SB180 on state laws are significant as it amends Chapter 342G of the Hawaii Revised Statutes. It empowers the Department of Health to incorporate more stringent oversight procedures to verify the operations of beverage distributors and redemption centers. This shift toward a risk-based auditing strategy indicates a proactive approach toward environmental stewardship, as accurate monitoring can lead to better recycling rates and reduced plastic waste. Additionally, the bill requires distributors to adopt internal processes to ensure the reliability of the data they report, enhancing accountability and promoting ethical business practices.

Summary

SB180 seeks to enhance the management and accountability of the Deposit Beverage Container Program in Hawaii by mandating the Department of Health to implement a risk-based selection process for auditing reports submitted by beverage distributors and redemption centers. The bill's primary goal is to ensure compliance within the program, particularly focusing on the accuracy of reported data and the overall efficiency of the redemption process. By establishing a systematic auditing procedure, the bill aims to detect discrepancies and enforce appropriate measures to uphold the integrity of the deposit beverage system.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment surrounding SB180 is supportive among environmental advocates who view it as a necessary step toward protecting Hawaii's natural resources. The anticipation of increased audits and accountability is seen as essential for improving the performance of the beverage container program. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential burden the new regulations might place on smaller distributors, leading to a discussion on finding the right balance between compliance and operational feasibility.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implementation timeline and the potential financial impact on beverage distributors. Critics express concerns that the auditing requirements could impose additional costs and operational challenges, particularly for small businesses already struggling with existing regulations. There is a dialogue among stakeholders about the need for additional resources or support from the Department of Health to assist these distributors in adapting to the new requirements, ensuring that the bill achieves its goals without unduly hindering local enterprises.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

OK HB2803

Alcoholic beverages; termination of distribution agreements; requirements; arbitration; inventory; effective date.

IL HB2956

LIQUOR-RETAILERS-TAP HANDLES

CA AB1205

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority: contracting.

LA HB502

Provides relative to dealer warranty compensation

OK SB950

Alcoholic beverages; prohibiting alcoholic beverages from being sold for less than a certain amount. Effective date.

VA SB1308

Motor vehicle dealers; recall and warranty costs, right of first refusal.

VA HB1683

Motor vehicle dealers; recall and warranty costs, right of first refusal.

CA SB311

Commercial cannabis activity: licensed distributors.