Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB32

Introduced
1/21/21  
Refer
1/22/21  
Report Pass
2/12/21  
Refer
2/12/21  
Report Pass
3/4/21  
Engrossed
3/9/21  
Refer
3/11/21  
Report Pass
3/19/21  
Refer
3/19/21  
Report Pass
3/25/21  

Caption

Relating To Infrastructure.

Impact

The proposed bill aims to ensure that public utilities account for traffic disruption and prioritize maintenance in areas with high vehicle traffic. In doing so, SB32 will likely enhance the efficiency of infrastructure projects while reducing traffic congestion. By enforcing a requirement for a permit, it seeks to streamline communication and cooperation among various agencies and utilities, potentially leading to fewer interruptions in travel and transportation due to utility work. However, the long-term effectiveness of the bill will depend on proper implementation and coordination among stakeholders.

Summary

SB32 addresses the governance of infrastructure management by amending Hawaii Revised Statutes, particularly concerning the disturbance of state highways. Specifically, it requires that no person or government agency may undertake activities that disrupt the right-of-way of state highways without obtaining a permit from the director of transportation or their authorized representatives. This is aimed at standardizing procedures for public utilities when handling maintenance and new installations to minimize disruption to traffic and ensure better coordination during infrastructure projects.

Sentiment

The general sentiment regarding SB32 appears to be one of support, particularly from members advocating for improved traffic management and efficiency in public utilities' operations. Proponents argue that the amendments will foster responsible maintenance practices that align with public transportation needs. There, however, may be some concerns regarding bureaucratic delays or additional layers of regulation that could arise from the permitting process, leading opponents to question whether the trade-off in bureaucratic requirements may hinder timely infrastructure improvements.

Contention

While there seems to be a consensus on the necessity of improving infrastructure regulations, debates may arise over the scope and effectiveness of the permitting process. Some critics might argue that requiring permits could introduce unnecessary delays in projects deemed urgent for public safety or economic reasons. The effectiveness of the bill will likely hinge on balancing the need for regulation with the flexibility necessary for swift infrastructure enhancements in a rapidly evolving urban environment.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2237

Transportation planning: regional transportation improvement plan: sustainable communities strategies: alternative planning strategy: state transportation funding.

CA SB1369

Energy: green electrolytic hydrogen.

CA SB1196

State Transit Assistance Program: eligibility: Anaheim Transportation Network.

HI HB699

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

HI SB770

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

UT SB0310

Transportation Utility Fee Amendments

CA AB1525

Transportation projects: priority populations.

TX SB2096

Relating to the creation of and the powers of a comprehensive multimodal urban transportation authority, including the power to impose taxes, issue bonds, and exercise limited eminent domain authority.