Requesting The Legislative Reference Bureau To Conduct An Analysis Regarding The Scope Of Practice For Advanced Practice Registered Nurses And Physician Assistants.
The bill proposes that the analysis consider the scope of practice in various specific medical areas, including school-based health services, medical care related to HIV for minors, abortion care, and the processes concerning the prescription of controlled substances. By clarifying and possibly expanding the scope of practice for APRNs and PAs, the resolution aims to enhance patient care and availability of services. Additionally, a comparative study of how Hawaii’s regulations differ from those of other states will provide valuable insights into the potential benefits of expanding practice scopes.
HCR100 is a House Concurrent Resolution from the State of Hawaii that requests the Legislative Reference Bureau to conduct an analysis regarding the scope of practice for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) and physician assistants (PAs). With a growing physician shortage, particularly in rural areas, the resolution aims to address gaps in healthcare access by exploring potential expansions to the roles and responsibilities of APRNs and PAs. This inquiry is crucial for assessing how these professionals can better complement the work of physicians in the state.
The sentiment surrounding HCR100 is generally supportive, aimed at improving healthcare accessibility in the face of physician shortages. However, as this is a request for an analytical study rather than a direct legislative change, it remains to be seen how stakeholders react once the findings are presented. The key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals and legislative bodies, are likely to weigh in on the proposed changes to ensure that the scope of practice enhances patient care without compromising safety and quality.
There may be points of contention concerning the expansion of practice rights, particularly regarding sensitive areas such as abortion care and medical aid in dying. Advocates for expanding the scope of practice argue that this will provide necessary healthcare access, while opponents could raise concerns about overstepping professional boundaries or patient safety issues. The outcome of the analysis will be pivotal in shaping future discussions and any subsequent legislative measures introduced in the upcoming session.