Requesting The Legislative Reference Bureau To Conduct An Analysis Regarding The Scope Of Practice For Advanced Practice Registered Nurses And Physician Assistants.
If enacted, the analysis mandated by H.R. 107 could lead to a clearer delineation of the specific roles and responsibilities assigned to APRNs and PAs. The bill suggests that these roles may need to expand into several facets of patient care, including school-based health services, HIV care for minors, abortion care, and more. This examination could enhance healthcare delivery in Hawaii, particularly in underserved areas, and ease the burden on physicians by allowing APRNs and PAs to operate more autonomously.
H.R. 107, introduced in the Thirty-Second Legislature of Hawaii, requests the Legislative Reference Bureau to conduct an analysis regarding the scope of practice for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) and physician assistants (PAs). The resolution arises from the recognized physician shortage in the state, particularly affecting rural areas where healthcare access is often limited. By examining the roles of APRNs and PAs, the bill aims to address gaps in healthcare provision, allowing these professionals to fill significant roles in patient care.
The sentiment surrounding H.R. 107 appears to be generally positive among healthcare professionals and advocates who recognize the critical need to leverage the skills of APRNs and PAs. However, there may be some concerns regarding the adequacy of training and the implications of expanding their scope of practice, especially in sensitive areas like abortion and medical aid in dying. The potential for reform in this area is seen as essential given the ongoing challenges in accessing quality healthcare in the state.
Notable points of contention surrounding the bill may include the debate over how far the scope of practice for APRNs and PAs should extend. Questions may arise about whether these practitioners have the necessary training to take on expanded responsibilities, particularly in complex medical situations. Additionally, the discussion surrounding abortion care and medical aid in dying could provoke divergent views based on personal beliefs and ethical considerations within the healthcare community and the broader public.