Hawaii 2023 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB1016

Introduced
1/20/23  
Refer
1/27/23  
Report Pass
2/17/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Report Pass
3/3/23  
Engrossed
3/7/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Refer
3/10/23  
Refer
3/14/23  
Report Pass
3/24/23  
Refer
3/24/23  
Report Pass
4/6/23  

Caption

Relating To Public-private Partnerships For The Delivery Of Health Care Services.

Impact

One of the significant impacts of SB1016 is the potential shift in operational responsibility from state-controlled healthcare services to private management. The State of Hawaii, along with the Hawaii Health Systems Corporation, will reduce its role in the direct management and operation of healthcare services at facilities such as Maui Memorial Medical Center, Kula Hospital and Clinic, and Lanai Community Hospital. This is expected to streamline operations and potentially lead to better healthcare outcomes by introducing varied management practices from non-profit entities with healthcare expertise.

Summary

Senate Bill 1016 seeks to amend the Hawaii Revised Statutes to facilitate the transfer of management responsibilities of certain healthcare facilities in the Maui regional system to private entities, specifically nonprofit management entities. The bill redefines 'private entity' to include businesses authorized in Hawaii that possess necessary licenses to operate community hospitals, which is aimed at improving management efficiency in healthcare delivery to rural populations. By allowing these entities to assume operational control, the bill seeks to promote enhanced healthcare services in areas that may be underserved.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1016 appears to be cautiously optimistic among healthcare advocates who believe that public-private partnerships could lead to improved service delivery, particularly in rural areas of Maui. However, there are concerns regarding accountability and the potential for profit-driven motives of private entities to overshadow community health needs. Proponents argue that with proper oversight, including pre-transfer evaluations mandated by the bill, these partnerships can offer innovative solutions to ongoing challenges in public healthcare management.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the extent of oversight the state will retain post-transfer and whether sufficient safeguards will be instituted to protect community interests. Critics may argue that transferring management to private entities could lead to a decline in service scope or affordability. The requirement for the Chief Executive Officer of the Hawaii Health Systems Corporation to provide written comments to the Governor prior to entering into new agreements is a step toward ensuring continued state involvement, yet skepticism remains about whether this would effectively prevent misalignments between private operational goals and public health objectives.

Companion Bills

HI HB1460

Same As Relating To Public-private Partnerships For The Delivery Of Health Care Services.

Similar Bills

HI SB1016

Relating To Public-private Partnerships For The Delivery Of Health Care Services.

HI HB1460

Relating To Public-private Partnerships For The Delivery Of Health Care Services.

HI HB1460

Relating To Public-private Partnerships For The Delivery Of Health Care Services.

HI SB997

Relating To Environmental Management.

HI HB1317

Relating To Environmental Management.

CA AB1146

California Small Business Rent Relief Act.

AZ HB2119

Homeowner's associations; fees

CA AB651

Nonprofit health facilities: sale of assets: Attorney General approval.