Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB1856

Introduced
1/19/24  
Refer
1/24/24  
Introduced
1/19/24  
Report Pass
2/14/24  
Refer
1/24/24  
Report Pass
2/14/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Refer
2/14/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  

Caption

Relating To Traffic Regulation.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1856 would significantly empower counties to restrict access to certain roads based on safety evaluations. This includes establishing requirements for specific vehicle types on non-standard roads and implementing limitations on access to certain locations to protect environmentally sensitive areas. By doing so, the legislation addresses the growing concerns over traffic surges that exceed the original design capacities of these roadways, thus prioritizing the safety of individuals using these paths as well as the integrity of cultural and ecological sites.

Summary

House Bill 1856 seeks to amend Hawaii's traffic regulations, specifically granting counties the authority to impose restrictions on the use of various streets, highways, and roadways that do not meet modern safety standards. This follows concerns that many of these roads were inherited by counties over time without adequate infrastructure or regulatory requirements. The bill aims to enhance public safety by allowing counties to manage access to these potentially dangerous areas, particularly in instances where the design and usage of the roadways pose risks to both travelers and the culturally significant sites that they connect to.

Sentiment

The sentiment around the bill is largely supportive among those prioritizing public safety and environmental protection. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step in addressing the challenges posed by the increasing traffic and the inadequate designs of older roadways. However, there may be concerns from individuals who feel that such regulations could complicate everyday access to certain areas, particularly for residents or businesses reliant on these routes. Thus, while the sentiment is generally positive for enhanced safety, there are undercurrents of apprehension about the implications for local access and freedom of movement.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 1856 include the balance of safety measures versus access rights. Opponents may voice concerns that imposing restrictions could hinder local businesses or isolate communities that depend on those roads for access. Furthermore, the bill stipulates that properties exclusively reachable by these non-standard roads must remain accessible, which highlights the complexity of adequately addressing safety while ensuring that the needs of local residents and businesses are respected.

Companion Bills

HI SB2226

Same As Relating To Traffic Regulation.

Similar Bills

HI SB2226

Relating To Traffic Regulation.

CA AB1426

Public resources: San Onofre State Beach: Richard H. and Donna O’Neill Conservancy: road construction.

CA AB1492

Employment: Telecommuting Act.

CA AB444

General plan: circulation element.

CA AB382

County of Orange: joint exercise of powers agreements: toll roads.

AZ SB1073

Obstruction highway; large event; classification

CA SB1373

State highways: State Route 241: reduction.

CA AB1273

County of Orange: joint exercise of powers agreements: toll roads.