Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB1981

Introduced
1/22/24  
Refer
1/24/24  
Introduced
1/22/24  
Report Pass
2/5/24  
Refer
1/24/24  
Report Pass
2/5/24  
Report Pass
2/14/24  
Refer
2/5/24  
Report Pass
2/14/24  

Caption

Relating To Traffic Violations.

Impact

By requiring that 50% of the fines collected for traffic violations be returned to the county enforcing the rules, the bill is expected to enhance local funding for law enforcement and traffic safety initiatives. This could lead to improved traffic management and safety measures as counties gain more direct financial resources to address issues like roadway accidents and congestion, fostering better conditions for both drivers and pedestrians alike.

Summary

House Bill 1981 aims to amend certain provisions related to traffic violations in Hawaii. Specifically, it updates the way fines collected from traffic infractions are handled by stipulating that a portion of these revenues should be disbursed to the counties that enforce the violations. The bill modifies existing statutes concerning the authority of the director of transportation and counties in regulating parking and stopping on highways, seeking to ensure fines collected are not only punitive but also provide financial support to local enforcement efforts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1981 appears to be generally supportive, as many stakeholders recognize the need for adequate funding in local law enforcement. Advocates argue that the bill encourages accountability and reshapes the financial incentives for counties, allowing them to become more proactive in traffic enforcement. However, there may be opponents who express concern regarding the implications of relying on traffic fines as a significant revenue source and what that might mean for public trust and community relations.

Contention

One notable point of contention could arise concerning how the bill impacts different counties, especially if certain areas generate more traffic violations than others. Some critics might argue that this financial model could create disparities between counties — those with higher traffic levels could benefit disproportionately compared to others. Such issues could provoke discussions about fairness in the enforcement of traffic regulations and the appropriate use of generated fines.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1991

Motels and hotels: publicly funded shelter programs.

CA AB1438

Civil rights.

CA AB1384

Civil rights.

CA AB670

Common interest developments: accessory dwelling units.

CA SB652

Entry doors: display of religious items: prohibitions.

CT HB06576

An Act Authorizing The Installation Of Stop Signs By The Traffic Authority Of Certain State Facilities.

DC B25-0482

Releasing Restrictive Covenants in Deeds Act of 2023

NV SB368

Revises provisions relating to real property. (BDR 10-989)