Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HCR70

Introduced
3/6/24  
Refer
3/8/24  
Introduced
3/6/24  
Report Pass
3/28/24  
Refer
3/8/24  
Report Pass
3/28/24  
Report Pass
4/4/24  
Refer
3/28/24  
Report Pass
4/4/24  
Refer
4/5/24  
Engrossed
4/4/24  
Report Pass
4/19/24  
Refer
4/5/24  
Passed
4/22/24  
Report Pass
4/19/24  

Caption

Requesting The Department Of Business, Economic Development, And Tourism To Convene A Sports Wagering Working Group To Conduct An Analysis Of The Potential Legalization And Regulation Of Online Sports Wagering In Hawaii.

Impact

If enacted, the recommendations from the working group could lead to the establishment of a regulated sports betting framework in Hawaii. This would not only potentially reduce the illegal betting operations but also channel the existing betting activities into a legal market, subsequently generating millions of dollars in tax revenue. The working group is expected to assess various aspects, including the regulatory structure, potential revenue, and the necessary consumer protections to safeguard bettors, drawing insights from states where sports betting is already legal.

Summary

HCR70, or the House Concurrent Resolution 70, seeks to address the issues associated with the illegal sports betting market in Hawaii by requesting the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism to convene a Sports Wagering Working Group. This group is tasked with conducting an analysis on the potential legalization and regulation of online sports wagering within the state. Advocates for the resolution highlight that the current lack of legal sports betting in Hawaii contributes to a significant illegal market, which lacks consumer protections and generates no tax revenue for the state.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HCR70 appears to be optimistic among proponents who foresee it as an opportunity to boost the state's economy and ensure a safer betting environment for consumers. However, there could also be concerns regarding the moral implications of legalized gambling and its societal effects. Ultimately, the sentiment hinges on the perceived benefits versus the risks, with a notable call for responsible gaming measures to be integral to any resulting legislation.

Contention

Discussion on HCR70 may include points of contention regarding the regulation of gambling in Hawaii, a state historically resistant to such practices. There could be apprehensions about how legalizing sports betting might influence local communities and whether the potential financial gains justify the societal costs. Ensuring that the regulatory framework addresses these concerns effectively will be crucial for garnering broader legislative support and public acceptance.

Companion Bills

HI HR55

Same As Requesting The Department Of Business, Economic Development, And Tourism To Convene A Sports Wagering Working Group To Conduct An Analysis Of The Potential Legalization And Regulation Of Online Sports Wagering In Hawaii.

Similar Bills

CA AB2557

Corporations: directors.

CA AB591

Central Basin Municipal Water District: board of directors.

CA SB387

Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency: board of directors.

CA AB1225

State parks and state beaches: Accessibility Advisory Committee.

DE HB243

An Act To Amend Titles 16, 24, And 29 Of The Delaware Code Relating To The Department Of Health And Social Services.

CO HB1447

Transit Reform

HI SB2685

Relating To Planned Community Associations.

HI HB1781

Relating To Planned Community Associations.