Requesting The Legislative Reference Bureau To Study The Year-round Legislature Models Of California, New York, Pennsylvania, And Wisconsin To Clarify The Similarities And Differences In Operations With Respect To Legislative Schedules, Operational Costs, Legislative And Staff Salaries, And Policies Regarding Outside Employment.
Impact
If enacted, HR119 could lead to significant changes in how the legislative processes function in Hawaii. The study seeks to assess not only the legislative schedules and staffing requirements but also the operational costs connected with transitioning to a year-round legislative model. Stakeholders will be interested in how these changes might impact state laws and policies, particularly in terms of their ability to be more attuned to the nuances of local concerns compared to a more limited session schedule.
Summary
House Resolution 119 requests a study by the Legislative Reference Bureau to explore the models of year-round legislatures used in California, New York, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The resolution posits that a year-round legislative session could better facilitate community engagement and emergency response, as well as provide lawmakers with more opportunities to understand public sentiment regarding various social and economic issues. The initiative highlights the potential benefits of improved transparency and responsiveness to constituents.
Sentiment
The sentiments regarding HR119 appear cautiously optimistic, with advocates of year-round sessions arguing that they would result in more effective governance and better legislative outcomes. However, there may be apprehensions about the associated costs and logistical implications, especially given that the financial burden on taxpayers has not been thoroughly examined. The willingness of stakeholders to engage with the study may depend on its projected findings regarding the costs and benefits of year-round operations.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding HR119 include concerns related to increased staffing requirements and operational costs. Critics may argue against the financial implications of year-round sessions, emphasizing that without a detailed study, the potential burden on taxpayers remains unclear. This tension between the perceived benefits of increased legislative productivity and transparency versus the fear of escalating costs will likely be a focal point in discussions as the study progresses.
Same As
Requesting The Legislative Reference Bureau To Conduct A Study Of A Continuous Legislative Session, Extending The Legislative Session, And Adding Additional Recess Days.
Requesting The Legislative Reference Bureau To Conduct A Study Of A Continuous Legislative Session, Extending The Legislative Session, And Adding Additional Recess Days.
Requesting The Legislative Reference Bureau To Conduct A Study Of A Continuous Legislative Session, Extending The Legislative Session, And Adding Additional Recess Days.
Requesting The Legislative Reference Bureau To Conduct A Study Of A Continuous Legislative Session, Extending The Legislative Session, And Adding Additional Recess Days.
A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.