Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2245

Introduced
1/18/24  
Refer
1/19/24  
Introduced
1/18/24  
Report Pass
2/15/24  
Refer
1/19/24  
Report Pass
2/15/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Refer
2/15/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Refer
3/20/24  
Report Pass
4/5/24  
Report Pass
4/5/24  
Enrolled
4/23/24  
Enrolled
4/23/24  
Chaptered
7/2/24  
Chaptered
7/2/24  

Caption

Relating To The Child Protective Act.

Impact

The implications of SB2245 extend to the overall statutory definitions of harm and imminent harm in relation to child welfare. By refining and expanding the terminology used in the Child Protective Act, the bill empowers law enforcement and child welfare agencies to act more decisively in protecting children. The amendments promote a sense of urgency and responsiveness in cases of suspected abuse or neglect, potentially resulting in more children being placed in safe environments promptly.

Summary

Senate Bill 2245, also known as the Child Protective Act, seeks to enhance the legal framework surrounding the protective custody of children in the state of Hawaii. The bill introduces a new definition for 'exigent circumstances,' which allows for emergency protective custody when immediate danger to a child's well-being is evident. This amendment aims to facilitate swift action by authorities to prevent harm and ensure children's safety in critical situations where waiting for a court order could lead to irrevocable harm.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be largely supportive among child welfare advocates, as the measure reinforces the priority of child safety. Proponents argue that giving police the ability to act swiftly in exigent situations will save lives. However, there may be concerns regarding the potential for overreach or misuse of the newly defined 'exigent circumstances,' indicating that a careful balance must be maintained between child protection and parents' rights.

Contention

One of the main points of contention could arise from the broader interpretation of what constitutes 'exigent circumstances.' Critics may argue that the flexibility provided in the bill could lead to instances where families are separated unnecessarily or without adequate justification. The bill's provisions for protective custody without prior notice or a hearing could also prompt debates regarding due process and parental rights, suggesting that stakeholders may need to address these challenges in implementation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

HI SB885

Relating To The Child Protective Act.

HI HB480

Relating To The Child Protective Act.

HI HB2555

Relating To The Child Protective Act.

HI SB1605

Relating To The Child Protective Act.

HI HB1401

Relating To The Child Protective Act.

HI HB2428

Relating To The Child Protective Act.

HI SB3117

Relating To The Child Protective Act.

HI SB1200

Relating To The Child Protective Act.

Similar Bills

HI HB2428

Relating To The Child Protective Act.

HI SB3117

Relating To The Child Protective Act.

MT SB384

Establish temporary hardship law

MT SB402

Provide for case determinations of investigations of reported child abuse or neglect

HI HB879

Relating To The Child Protective Act.

HI HB879

Relating To The Child Protective Act.

MT SB206

Generally revise laws related to child abuse and neglect proceedings and investigations

MT SB18

Revise the definition of child abuse or neglect