Relating To The Hawaii Administrative Rules.
If enacted, the bill has significant implications for the implementation and enforcement of administrative rules in Hawaii. By requiring each state agency to cooperate with the blue ribbon committee, the legislation aims to ensure that existing regulations align with statutory mandates. Additionally, the bill places a due date for the committee's findings and recommendations, which could lead to proposed legislative changes by 2025, thereby influencing future state regulatory frameworks and initiatives.
Senate Bill 2823 establishes a blue ribbon committee within the Department of the Attorney General tasked with analyzing the Hawaii Administrative Rules. The goal of the committee is to identify any existing rules that lack support from the Hawaii Revised Statutes, thus aiming for regulatory consistency and efficiency within state governance. This initiative reflects a broader trend toward reassessing and potentially streamlining administrative regulations in Hawaii, with the underlying belief that such efforts could enhance operational effectiveness across various state agencies.
The general sentiment surrounding SB 2823 appears to be supportive, particularly among stakeholders advocating for better governmental efficiency and oversight. Proponents argue that the establishment of the blue ribbon committee indicates a positive step towards refining administrative processes and eliminating outdated or unsupported rules. However, there may be concerns regarding the implications of removing certain rules that serve specific functions, which could prompt discussions among various community interest groups.
While the bill is primarily aimed at enhancing governmental efficiency, it may raise points of contention, particularly regarding which rules might be deemed unnecessary or unsupported. Stakeholders may challenge decisions made by the blue ribbon committee, especially if recommendations lead to the elimination of specific regulations that some view as beneficial. Consequently, this process could generate dialogue around balancing regulation and flexibility in administration.