Relating To Statutory Revision: Amending Or Repealing Various Provisions Of The Hawaii Revised Statutes Or The Session Laws Of Hawaii For The Purposes Of Correcting Errors And References, Clarifying Language, Or Deleting Obsolete Or Unnecessary Provisions.
The passage of SB2958 would lead to numerous changes across various statutes in Hawaii, which could affect multiple sectors including administrative practices, the legal framework for state governance, and potentially impact how laws are interpreted and enforced. By clarifying provisions and removing outdated references, it could promote consistency in the application of Hawaii state laws. This act underscores the importance of legislative housekeeping and maintaining the relevance of state codes in a continually evolving legal landscape.
SB2958, a bill relating to statutory revision, seeks to amend or repeal various provisions of the Hawaii Revised Statutes as well as session laws. This legislation aims to correct errors, clarify language, and eliminate provisions that are considered obsolete or unnecessary. The bill represents a significant effort to streamline the state's legal texts, ensuring that they are accurate and up to date, which is essential for effective governance. By addressing such issues, the bill seeks to make the statutes more accessible and comprehensible for both lawmakers and the public at large.
General sentiment surrounding SB2958 has been largely positive among legislators who emphasize the necessity of keeping statutory language precise and functional. While there may be minor concerns about the implications of certain amendments for specific legal interpretations, the overall attitude is supportive, recognizing the bill's role in fostering a more efficient legal framework. This aligns with broader legislative goals to improve governance and reduce ambiguity in state laws.
Notable points of contention associated with SB2958 are primarily technical in nature, revolving around the specific amendments proposed. Some legislators have raised questions about the specific references that will be modified or deleted, fearing that they may inadvertently affect legal rights or obligations. However, proponents assure that the revisions are carefully vetted and necessary for proper statutory function. The discussions in committee have focused on the merits of these changes, aiming to balance modernization with safeguarding existing legal protections.