Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB228

Introduced
1/17/25  
Refer
1/21/25  
Report Pass
2/4/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Report Pass
2/14/25  
Refer
2/14/25  
Report Pass
2/28/25  
Engrossed
2/28/25  
Refer
3/4/25  
Report Pass
3/21/25  
Refer
3/21/25  

Caption

Relating To License Plates.

Impact

The implementation of HB 228 would directly modify Chapter 286 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes by adding provisions that specifically ban license plate flipping devices and the obscuring of license plates using covers or shields. With fines ranging from $500 to $1,000 for these violations, the bill seeks to strengthen compliance with existing traffic laws and improve accountability among vehicle owners. As a result, law enforcement would have clearer authority to address violations and ensure that license plates remain visible and identifiable.

Summary

House Bill 228 focuses on regulating the use of license plate flipping devices in the state of Hawaii. The bill aims to prohibit the possession, sale, and use of devices that switch between different license plates or obscure the view of a license plate from law enforcement. The intent of the bill is to enhance public safety and simplify the identification of vehicles for traffic control purposes. By establishing minimum fines for violations, the bill also emphasizes the seriousness of the offense and serves as a deterrent against the use of such devices.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 228 appears to be supportive among lawmakers who prioritize public safety and law enforcement efficiency. Advocates argue that the use of flipping devices undermines traffic regulations, creating potential safety hazards. However, there may also be dissent from individuals or groups concerned about the implications for personal privacy and the regulation of vehicle ownership, emphasizing the importance of balancing safety with civil liberties.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential overreach of government regulations in personal vehicle modifications and the financial burden imposed on vehicle owners who may inadvertently violate the new rules. Critics may argue that the legislation could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals who rely on older vehicles and cannot afford potential fines. The debate surrounding the bill highlights a tension between ensuring effective law enforcement and protecting individual rights regarding vehicle use.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB712

Control of deadly weapons.

CA AB303

Firearms: prohibited persons.

CA AB1735

Transit districts: prohibition orders.

CA SB1417

Transit districts: prohibition orders.

CA AB468

Transit districts: prohibition orders.

CA AB730

Transit districts: prohibition orders.

CA AB1680

Transportation: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District: policing responsibilities.

CA AB1337

Transportation: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District: policing responsibilities.