Relating To Historic Preservation.
If enacted, HB 738 would modify several processes within existing state laws related to historic preservation. It empowers lead agencies, including county governments, to determine potential impacts of proposed developments on historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites. The bill introduces specific time limits – 90 days for general project reviews and 30 days if no historic property is affected – for the Department of Land and Natural Resources to respond with its concurrence or non-concurrence regarding these projects. This aspect could significantly speed up the approval process for housing developments.
House Bill 738, titled 'Relating to Historic Preservation,' aims to address Hawaii's housing crisis while also preserving its important cultural and historical resources. The bill recognizes the need to expedite housing development specifically in transit-oriented areas, which it defines as zones with low risk of affecting historically significant resources. The proposal outlines a systematic process for faster reviews of residential mixed-use projects, thereby balancing development with heritage preservation.
The general sentiment regarding HB 738 suggests a hybrid outlook. Proponents argue that it is essential for creating more housing opportunities in proximity to urban transit, while also ensuring that the review process respects historical preservation. Conversely, some stakeholders worry that the expedited measures may risk overlooking significant cultural and historical sites in favor of rapid development. This tension highlights the ongoing struggle to meet housing demands while safeguarding Hawaii's unique heritage.
One notable point of contention stems from fears that the expedited review process may compromise the thoroughness of evaluations regarding historically significant resources. Critics argue that, while the bill addresses urgent housing needs, it may inadvertently undermine protections for culturally important sites by reducing the time allocated for review. Furthermore, the bill's long-term effectiveness in ensuring a proper balance between development and preservation will likely become a focal point in further legislative discussions and community sentiment.