Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB960

Introduced
1/23/25  
Refer
1/23/25  
Report Pass
2/11/25  
Refer
2/11/25  
Report Pass
2/28/25  
Engrossed
3/4/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Report Pass
3/21/25  
Refer
3/21/25  
Report Pass
4/4/25  
Report Pass
4/25/25  
Report Pass
4/25/25  

Caption

Relating To Transportation.

Impact

The bill notably increases the maximum contract value that the Department of Transportation can execute without needing legislative approval from $2 million to $5 million. Additionally, it raises the total aggregate value of all capital advancement contracts that the department can enter into in a fiscal year from $5 million to $30 million. This expansion is intended to ease the process of funding significant improvements and expedite critical infrastructural developments in state harbors, thereby promoting economic growth within the transportation sector.

Summary

House Bill 960 focuses on improving the efficiency of capital advancement projects related to state harbor facilities in Hawaii. The bill allows the Department of Transportation to enter into capital advancement contracts with private parties aimed at enhancing operational efficiency and resilience of harbors. In light of the current limitations posed by fiscal caps on these projects, HB960 seeks to amend existing statutes to facilitate faster approvals and execution of larger projects without necessitating legislative involvement for lower contract values.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB960 appears to be supportive among stakeholders who prioritize improved efficiency and resilience in state transportation infrastructure. The revisions proposed by the bill are seen as necessary steps to modernize the state's harbor facilities and streamline the approval process for important capital projects. However, there may be concerns regarding oversight and transparency given the increased contract thresholds, as this reduces legislative engagement in approving significant expenditure.

Contention

While the bill is primarily positioned as an efficiency measure, there may be points of contention regarding the potential implications for oversight and accountability in how state funds are allocated to capital projects. Critics might argue that reducing legislative approval requirements could lead to less scrutiny of contracts and potential mismanagement of public funds, thus emphasizing the need for robust reporting mechanisms as stipulated in the legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ S1639

Requires surety to take certain actions after assuming responsibility for completion of transportation project.

NJ A3943

Requires surety to take certain actions after assuming responsibility for completion of transportation project.

NJ S4104

Requires surety to take certain actions after assuming responsibility for completion of transportation project.

CA AB2039

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority: job order contracting: pilot program.

HI SB1076

Relating To Transportation.

CA AB499

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority: job order contracting: pilot program.

CA AB630

Department of Transportation: contracts: tribes.

CA AB1475

Construction Manager/General Contractor method: transportation projects.