The proposed law would amend the Hawaii Revised Statutes by introducing a new chapter specifically addressing foreign land ownership near military installations. It stipulates that violations could lead to significant consequences, including classification as a class C felony for prohibited foreign parties and mandates divestment of any unlawfully acquired land within a specified timeframe. Additionally, the attorney general would have enhanced authority to investigate and enforce these restrictions, emphasizing the law's serious approach to safeguarding military interests.
SB1006, introduced in the Hawaii legislature, is aimed at enhancing the security of military installations by prohibiting foreign ownership of property within ten miles of such sites. The bill establishes a legal framework that disallows any natural person who is not a U.S. citizen, or any foreign business entities with substantial foreign control, from acquiring interests in proximate lands. This measure arises from concerns over the potential risks and threats posed by foreign ownership in sensitive areas vital for state and national security.
While the bill is rooted in the need for heightened security, it may spark debate over property rights and the implications for resident aliens and foreign investors. Critics could argue that it unfairly discriminates against non-U.S. citizens and potentially limits economic opportunities. Proponents, however, assert that the primary focus is national security, advocating for the necessity of these restrictions in maintaining control over lands adjacent to military facilities. The balance between security measures and individual property rights remains a notable point of contention regarding this legislative proposal.