Hawaii Senate Bill SR83

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/25
• Refer: 3/11/25

Caption

Urging The Department Of Health And University Of Hawaii Water Resources Research Center To Take All Action Necessary To Incentivize Wastewater Treatment Plants To Test Sewage Sludge, Reclaimed Water, And Any Other Residual Material For The Presence Of Perfluoroalkyl And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.

Impact

The resolution seeks to implement new administrative rules governing the disposal and management of PFAS-contaminated waste. It focuses on establishing a framework that prohibits the use of sewage sludge and reclaimed water on farms that may lead to contamination of the surrounding land and waterways, particularly in agronomic uses. If enacted, this could significantly alter farming practices and wastewater management policies in Hawaii to mitigate ecological and health risks posed by these harmful substances. Additionally, the resolution aligns with federal regulations expected from the Environmental Protection Agency, which indicates a growing recognition of the need for robust testing and management of PFAS levels.

Summary

Senate Resolution 83 (SR83) aims to prompt the Department of Health and the University of Hawaii Water Resources Research Center to take decisive actions for assessing pollutants, particularly perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), in residual materials such as sewage sludge and reclaimed water. This resolution highlights the urgent need for regular testing of these materials due to the health risks associated with PFAS, often referred to as 'forever chemicals' for their persistence in the environment. Proponents argue that without comprehensive testing, crops, soil, and ultimately public health are at considerable risk due to potential PFAS contamination in food supplies.

Contention

There may be points of contention surrounding the feasibility and economic implications of implementing such testing for wastewater treatment plants and agricultural uses. Stakeholders in agriculture and wastewater management could argue about the potential costs and operational challenges involved in adhering to these proposed regulations. Opponents might also express concerns about the bureaucratic implications of increased regulation on local farmers and businesses, and whether the proposed measures could effectively address the contamination issues without imposing undue burdens on responsible agricultural practices.