Iowa House Bill HF666

Iowa 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/13/23
• Engrossed: 4/11/23
• Enrolled: 5/16/23
• Passed: 6/1/23

Caption

A bill for an act providing for programs and regulations administered and enforced by the department of agriculture and land stewardship, providing fees, providing for the allocation of moneys, making penalties applicable, and including effective date provisions. (Formerly HF 277, HSB 113.) Effective date: 06/01/2023, 07/01/2023.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts state laws by updating procedures regarding the regulation of commercial establishments, specifically pet shops and grain dealers. It introduces new definitions and criteria for these establishments, impacts licensing and fee structures, and outlines specific duties for the Department of Agriculture. Furthermore, it reinforces the need for accurate measurements in grain transactions, thus aiming to safeguard consumers and providers in the agricultural sector through stricter compliance and documentation requirements.

Summary

House File 666, introduced in the Iowa legislature, focuses on establishing and modifying regulations and programs related to agriculture and land stewardship. The bill provides a framework for the Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship to enforce regulations, establish fees, and manage an indemnity fund for grain depositors and sellers. Through various amendments, the bill seeks to enhance the existing regulatory environment while ensuring compliance and safety measures for commercial agricultural practices.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HF666 appears to be supportive among agricultural stakeholders who appreciate the clarity and regulatory consistency the bill provides. However, concerns were raised about the potential financial burden of new fees on small operators. The majority sentiment within committee discussions leaned towards the necessity of these regulations for maintaining industry standards and ensuring fair practice in agriculture.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions about the potential implications of increased fees on smaller agricultural establishments and whether specific amendments would effectively address the needs of diverse farming operations. Critics argued that additional fees might disproportionately affect small farmers, hindering their economic viability. Proponents countered by emphasizing the importance of establishing a robust regulatory framework to protect the integrity of Iowa's agriculture industry and promote fairness in grain pricing and quality controls.