Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB1628

Introduced
2/1/23  
Introduced
2/1/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Refer
2/1/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Engrossed
3/23/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Refer
3/24/23  
Engrossed
3/23/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
3/24/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Chaptered
6/30/23  
Chaptered
6/30/23  

Caption

LANDLORDS-ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS

Impact

The passage of HB1628 directly impacts the relationship between landlords and tenants by ensuring that tenants cannot be compelled to use electronic payment systems. Landlords are required to accept other forms of payment, ensuring that no tenant is disadvantaged based on their access to technology. Notably, failure to comply with this law would subject landlords to civil penalties under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, thus enhancing protections for tenants against potential abuses.

Summary

House Bill 1628 amends the Illinois Landlord and Tenant Act to regulate the methods by which landlords can receive rent payments. Specifically, the bill prohibits landlords from mandating tenants to use electronic funds transfers (EFT) as a means of payment for rent under residential leases. This legislative change aims to provide tenants with greater flexibility and options regarding how they remit payments, addressing concerns that some tenants may not have access to electronic banking systems or feel uncomfortable using them for financial transactions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1628 appears generally positive, especially among tenant advocacy groups and consumer rights organizations. Supporters appreciate the bill's focus on tenant rights and autonomy in financial matters. However, some landlords may express concerns over logistical challenges and administrative burdens in handling various payment methods. Overall, the sentiment validates a shift toward more accessible and inclusive practices in rental agreements.

Contention

Discussions surrounding HB1628 included points of contention related to the feasibility of implementing such changes for landlords accustomed to standardized electronic transactions. Some stakeholders voiced concerns about the additional administrative workload this bill could impose on property owners, while others emphasized the need for protective measures for vulnerable tenants. This balancing act reflects a broader debate on how to enhance consumer protections without overburdening small and medium-sized landlords.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.