Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB2091

Introduced
2/2/23  
Refer
2/7/23  
Introduced
2/2/23  
Refer
2/15/23  
Refer
2/7/23  
Report Pass
2/22/23  
Refer
2/15/23  
Engrossed
3/16/23  
Report Pass
2/22/23  
Refer
3/21/23  
Engrossed
3/16/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Refer
3/21/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Chaptered
6/30/23  
Chaptered
6/30/23  

Caption

SOS-AGE FOR DRIVING TEST

Impact

The implications of HB2091 are significant in terms of state laws governing driver's licensing and testing. By allowing for potential changes to testing requirements based on empirical data, the bill seeks to enhance road safety while considering the capabilities of older drivers. It establishes a sound framework for ongoing evaluation of driving safety standards as related to age, fostering a data-driven approach in state policy regarding elderly drivers.

Summary

House Bill 2091 focuses on the assessment of driving capabilities in relation to age, specifically amending provisions of the Secretary of State Act and the Illinois Vehicle Code. The bill mandates that the Secretary of State conduct a study on age-related changes affecting driving abilities, including aspects like vision, physical functioning, and cognitive abilities. This study aims to evaluate the impact of age on safe driving and seeks to potentially adjust the requirements for driving tests based on the findings. Any amendments would not allow lowering the minimum age requirements below the current thresholds.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment regarding the bill appears to be supportive of the initiative to adapt driving regulations based on scientific study and data analysis. Advocates for the bill argue that it prioritizes public safety while ensuring that older drivers retain their ability to license and operate vehicles, provided they meet safety standards. However, there may be concerns regarding the implications of the administrative rules that could arise from the study's findings, especially if stricter testing procedures are implemented.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the balance between ensuring safety and maintaining the independence of older drivers. While supporters view the bill as a proactive measure to refine testing standards, critics might argue that it could lead to unnecessary bureaucracy or unfair restrictions on senior drivers. The bill addresses a critical demographic issue, raising questions about the equity and accessibility of driving for older citizens while striving to uphold public safety.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB493

District agricultural associations: secretary-managers: compensation.

LA HB528

Reforms the organizational structure for the Department of Transportation and Development including its duties, powers, and responsibilities of officers and employees (RR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

CA AB1044

Elections: Secretary of State.

AR SB63

To Amend Arkansas Law Concerning Reports By The Secretaries Of Cabinet-level Departments On The State Of Their Departments.

CA AB1206

Voter registration database: Electronic Registration Information Center.

CA SB297

Elections: initiatives and referenda: withdrawal.

CA AB1004

Secretary of State: voter information Internet Web site.

CA AB2050

Voter registration database: Electronic Registration Information Center