Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB2248

Introduced
2/8/23  
Refer
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/8/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Refer
2/14/23  
Report Pass
3/1/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Engrossed
3/21/23  
Report Pass
3/1/23  
Refer
3/22/23  
Engrossed
3/21/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
3/22/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Enrolled
5/10/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Enrolled
5/10/23  
Chaptered
6/30/23  
Chaptered
6/30/23  

Caption

CIVIL RIGHTS REMEDIES RESTORE

Impact

The bill has significant implications for state laws governing civil rights. It addresses violations of various federal laws, including the Rehabilitation Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Civil Rights Act. By allowing for the recovery of emotional distress damages and other forms of compensation, HB2248 aims to fill a gap left by the Supreme Court ruling. This restoration of rights is positioned as essential to the general welfare of Illinois residents, particularly those who have faced discrimination in settings receiving federal assistance.

Summary

House Bill 2248, known as the Civil Rights Remedies Restoration Act, is aimed at reinstating legal remedies for individuals whose civil rights have been violated. The legislation is a response to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, which limited the ability to claim damages for emotional distress under certain federal civil rights statutes. By establishing a statutory minimum of $4,000 for violations, the bill seeks to ensure that victims of discrimination receive just compensation and promote accountability for perpetrators.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2248 is largely positive among advocates for civil rights, who view it as a vital step in protecting individuals from discrimination and ensuring access to justice. Supporters emphasize the bill's importance in addressing the chilling effect of the Supreme Court ruling on victims’ willingness to seek redress. However, some dissenters express concerns around the potential for increased litigation and the burden it may place on state resources.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB2248 include debates over the financial implications for the state and institutions affected by potential lawsuits. Critics argue that increasing the liability for emotional distress damages could lead to a flood of claims, thereby straining the courts and financial resources. Additionally, discussions highlight the importance of striking a balance between adequately compensating victims of discrimination and preventing undue burdens on organizations that may inadvertently violate civil rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.