Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB2799

Introduced
2/16/23  
Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Refer
2/16/23  
Report Pass
3/7/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Engrossed
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/7/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Engrossed
3/22/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Chaptered
7/28/23  
Chaptered
7/28/23  

Caption

INS-DHFS-PROTON BEAM THERAPY

Impact

The enactment of HB 2799 could significantly impact healthcare laws related to cancer treatment in Illinois. By requiring equal coverage for proton beam therapy, the bill aims to enhance treatment options for cancer patients, making advanced radiation therapy more accessible. This legislation addresses concerns over disparities in insurance coverage, particularly for innovative treatment methods, which have been subject to more stringent approval processes compared to traditional therapies.

Summary

House Bill 2799 establishes provisions for coverage of proton beam therapy within Illinois' health insurance and managed care programs. This legislation mandates that insurance providers must not apply a higher standard of clinical evidence for proton beam therapy compared to other forms of radiation therapy for cancer treatment. The changes will take effect for policies issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2025, thereby ensuring that patients requiring this specific treatment will have access to it under their insurance plans.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2799 appears to be largely positive, especially among healthcare advocates and cancer patient groups who view it as a crucial step toward modernizing insurance practices. Supporters argue that the bill reflects a commitment to patient-centered care and ensures that individuals have access to necessary medical technologies. It is anticipated that the bill will receive bipartisan support, acknowledging the importance of improving cancer care in the state.

Contention

While general support for HB 2799 is evident, some concerns have been expressed regarding the potential costs to insurance providers and the implications for premiums. Critics might argue that mandating equal coverage for specific therapies could lead to increased financial strain on insurance systems. However, supporters counter that the long-term benefits for patient health and treatment outcomes justify the approach, fostering an environment that prioritizes innovative treatments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.