Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB3172

Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Engrossed
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Engrossed
3/22/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Chaptered
8/4/23  
Chaptered
8/4/23  

Caption

ASSISTED LIVING-INSULIN ADMIN

Impact

Upon enactment, HB 3172 would significantly influence how assisted living facilities operate in Illinois. It clarifies the categories of individuals who can no longer be accepted into these establishments, potentially impacting the admissions processes. Facilities may need to adjust their caregiving models and staffing levels to ensure compliance with these new residency standards. The amendment emphasizes the facility’s responsibility to provide adequate services and enforces strict limitations on new admissions based on residents' care needs.

Summary

House Bill 3172 is an amendment to the Assisted Living and Shared Housing Act, primarily focusing on the residency requirements for individuals in assisted living facilities. The bill stipulates that individuals who cannot receive proper services, or who require more intensive care than what the facility can provide, will not be accepted for residency. It also defines specific conditions under which a person may be denied residency, including severe mental illness, total assistance with daily activities, and the need for medically intensive procedures that cannot be self-administered.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be generally supportive among those who advocate for higher standards in assisted living care. Proponents argue that this move is essential for the safety and well-being of residents, as it ensures that only individuals who can be adequately cared for are accepted into these facilities. However, there may be contention regarding the exclusions, particularly from advocates for individuals with disabilities, who may view these regulations as overly restrictive and potentially discriminatory.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns from disability rights advocates about the implications of the bill on individuals with mental health issues or severe disabilities. Critics may argue that by denying residency to individuals requiring specific medical assistance, the bill could force vulnerable populations into less suitable living arrangements. This aspect reflects a broader debate around ensuring both quality of care and accessibility for diverse populations needing assistance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2233

Excess state land: development of affordable housing.

CA AB1978

Department of Housing and Community Development: powers.

CA SB1325

California Techquity Innovation Program.

CA AB1277

Transportation projects: oversight committees.

CA SB755

Energy efficiency and building decarbonization programs.

CA AB2049

Housing: EO N-06-19 State Land Affordable Housing Infrastructure, Demolition, Abatement, and Remediation Fund: grant program.

CA AB244

Specialized Inclusivity Training for Childcare Staff Grant Program.

CA AB402

Office of the Claimant Advocate and Stakeholder Advisory Group.