Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois House Bill HB3479

Introduced
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/17/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Report Pass
3/7/23  
Refer
2/28/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Report Pass
3/7/23  
Engrossed
4/27/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Refer
5/2/23  
Engrossed
4/27/23  

Caption

FINANCIAL REGULATION-VARIOUS

Impact

The enactment of HB 3479 will significantly impact state laws by creating a standardized licensing and regulatory regime for digital asset businesses operating within Illinois. It introduces new provisions for customer disclosures and protective measures, ensuring transparently that consumers are informed of risks associated with digital assets. Additionally, the Department is tasked with creating a Digital Assets Regulation Fund, which will facilitate the administration and enforcement of the act. This shift aims to modernize how financial activities related to digital assets are governed.

Summary

House Bill 3479, known as the Uniform Money Transmission Modernization Act, seeks to revamp Illinois's regulations concerning money transmission and digital asset businesses. The primary aim is to replace existing laws under the Transmitters of Money Act and establish a more streamlined regulatory framework. This bill emphasizes enhancing coordination among states to reduce regulatory burdens, protect customers from financial crimes, and ensure that innovative and competitive business practices are supported while maintaining safety and soundness in the financial system.

Sentiment

Discussions and sentiments around HB 3479 have revealed a generally positive outlook among stakeholders, particularly those in the digital finance industry who argue that clearer regulations will foster growth and innovation. Proponents believe this bill reflects progress toward adapting existing laws to the modern digital landscape. However, there are concerns regarding potential overreach and the adequacy of protections for consumers, particularly regarding transparency and security measures.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between fostering innovation and ensuring consumer protections. Critics have called for more rigorous safeguards against potential financial malpractices in the burgeoning field of digital assets, while supporters argue that excessive regulation could stifle business development. The ongoing discourse highlights a critical tension in the legislation: how to effectively protect consumers without hampering the growth and evolution of financial technologies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

IL SB3412

UNIFORM MONEY TRANSMISSION ACT

IL SB3670

FINANCIAL REGULATION-VARIOUS

KS HB2560

Enacting the Kansas money transmission act and the Kansas earned wage access services act, providing when applications under the state banking code are considered abandoned or expired, allowing an originating trustee to have such trustee's principal place of business outside of Kansas, authorizing any person to become a depositor or lessor of a safe deposit box, providing methods in which bank deposits may be withdrawn by a depositor and prohibiting banks from requiring a cosigner for an account of a child in the custody of the secretary for children and families, secretary of corrections or a federally recognized Indian tribe.

MA H1106

Relative to the regulation of money transmission by the Division of Banks

IL SB3666

DIGITAL ASSETS REGULATION ACT

MO SB1359

Modifies provisions relating to financial institutions

IL SB1797

DIGITAL ASSETS & CONS PROT ACT

IL HB0742

REGULATION-TECH