LANGUAGE EQUITY & ACCESS ACT
The act mandates that each state agency and covered entity develop a language access plan that identifies the populations they serve, outlines actions for equitable service delivery, and includes metrics for compliance assessment. The DLEA is tasked with monitoring the implementation of these plans, providing technical assistance, and collecting language data for better understanding of community needs. Furthermore, the DLEA will report annually to the General Assembly on the progress and compliance of state entities regarding language access provision.
House Bill 5387, also known as the Language Equity and Access Act, seeks to improve access to state services for residents with limited English proficiency in Illinois. The legislation's primary purpose is to remove language barriers that hinder these individuals from obtaining essential information, services, and programs from state agencies. To achieve this, the bill establishes a Division of Language Equity and Access (DLEA) within the Governor's Office of New Americans, which will lead statewide efforts aimed at implementing the language equity and access policy.
By setting clear guidelines and expectations for state agencies, HB 5387 aims to create a more equitable environment for residents with limited English proficiency. The establishment of annual compliance reports illustrates a commitment to accountability and transparency, ensuring that the state's efforts to improve language access remain ongoing and adaptive to the needs of its diverse population.
Notably, HB 5387 reinforces existing federal guidance related to language access, incorporating elements of the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and various presidential executive orders. This alignment indicates the state's commitment to uphold civil rights and increase access for underserved communities. However, discussions around the bill may raise concerns related to the effectiveness of implementation strategies, the required resources for state agencies, and ensuring adequate staffing of bilingual employees. Critics may question whether the bill goes far enough to guarantee that translation and interpretation services are readily available and effective in real-world scenarios.