Illinois Senate Bill SB1441

Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/7/23
• Refer: 2/7/23
• Refer: 2/14/23
• Refer: 3/31/23
• Refer: 4/19/24

Caption

CIVIL RIGHTS-REAL ESTATE

Impact

The implications of SB1441 are significant. By officially classifying discrimination based on conviction records as a civil rights violation, the bill aims to eliminate barriers that individuals with criminal histories face in securing housing and financial support. This move is expected to foster greater accessibility and inclusion in the housing market, promoting a more equitable environment. Supporters argue that this bill will lead to improved opportunities for reintegration of formerly incarcerated individuals into society, while simultaneously addressing systemic biases present in the housing and financial sectors.

Summary

SB1441 amends the Illinois Human Rights Act to enhance protections against discrimination in real estate transactions and loan modification services due to a person's conviction record. Under this bill, it is a civil rights violation for any person or entity involved in real estate transactions to discriminate against someone based on their conviction history. This includes refusing service, altering terms, or misrepresenting property availability due to a person's past convictions. Additionally, it imposes similar regulations on third-party loan modification service providers, reinforcing the importance of fair access to housing and financial aid irrespective of a person's criminal history.

Contention

Debate surrounding SB1441 largely focuses on concerns from various stakeholders about unintended consequences. Critics argue that existing statutes already provided adequate safeguards against discrimination, suggesting that additional measures may lead to complications or an influx of litigation surrounding real estate transactions. Some real estate professionals express concerns over the practical enforcement of the bill, fearing it may limit their discretion in business decisions regarding tenants or applicants. However, proponents counter these claims by highlighting the necessity of such legislation to combat entrenched biases and support the successful reintegration of those with prior convictions.