Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | - | Public Act 103-0491 | |
2 | 1 | SB1570 EnrolledLRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
3 | 2 | SB1570 Enrolled LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
4 | - | AN ACT concerning local government. | |
5 | - | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, | |
6 | - | represented in the General Assembly: | |
7 | - | Section 5. The Illinois Municipal Code is amended by | |
8 | - | adding Division 39.2 to Article 11 as follows: | |
9 | - | (65 ILCS 5/Art. 11 Div. 39.2 heading) | |
10 | - | DIVISION 39.2. MUNICIPAL DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTS | |
11 | - | (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-1 new) | |
12 | - | Sec. 11-39.2-1. Short title. This Division may be cited as | |
13 | - | the Municipal Design-Build Authorization Act. | |
14 | - | (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-5 new) | |
15 | - | Sec. 11-39.2-5. Purpose. The purpose of this Division is | |
16 | - | to authorize municipalities to use design-build processes to | |
17 | - | increase the efficiency and effectiveness of delivering public | |
18 | - | projects. | |
19 | - | (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-10 new) | |
20 | - | Sec. 11-39.2-10. Definitions. As used in this Division: | |
21 | - | "Delivery system" means the design and construction | |
22 | - | approach used to develop and construct a project. | |
23 | - | "Design-bid-build" means the traditional delivery system | |
3 | + | 1 AN ACT concerning local government. | |
4 | + | 2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, | |
5 | + | 3 represented in the General Assembly: | |
6 | + | 4 Section 5. The Illinois Municipal Code is amended by | |
7 | + | 5 adding Division 39.2 to Article 11 as follows: | |
8 | + | 6 (65 ILCS 5/Art. 11 Div. 39.2 heading) | |
9 | + | 7 DIVISION 39.2. MUNICIPAL DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTS | |
10 | + | 8 (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-1 new) | |
11 | + | 9 Sec. 11-39.2-1. Short title. This Division may be cited as | |
12 | + | 10 the Municipal Design-Build Authorization Act. | |
13 | + | 11 (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-5 new) | |
14 | + | 12 Sec. 11-39.2-5. Purpose. The purpose of this Division is | |
15 | + | 13 to authorize municipalities to use design-build processes to | |
16 | + | 14 increase the efficiency and effectiveness of delivering public | |
17 | + | 15 projects. | |
18 | + | 16 (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-10 new) | |
19 | + | 17 Sec. 11-39.2-10. Definitions. As used in this Division: | |
20 | + | 18 "Delivery system" means the design and construction | |
21 | + | 19 approach used to develop and construct a project. | |
22 | + | 20 "Design-bid-build" means the traditional delivery system | |
24 | 23 | ||
25 | 24 | ||
26 | 25 | ||
27 | 26 | SB1570 Enrolled LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
28 | 27 | ||
29 | 28 | ||
30 | - | used on public projects that incorporates the competitive | |
31 | - | bidding process set forth in this Code. | |
32 | - | "Design-build" means a delivery system that provides | |
33 | - | responsibility within a single contract for the furnishing of | |
34 | - | architecture, engineering, land surveying, and related | |
35 | - | services, as required, and the labor, materials, equipment, | |
36 | - | and other construction services for the project. | |
37 | - | "Design-build contract" means a contract for a public | |
38 | - | project under this Division between a municipality and a | |
39 | - | design-build entity to furnish: architecture, engineering, | |
40 | - | land surveying, public art or interpretive exhibits, and | |
41 | - | related services, as required, and the labor, materials, | |
42 | - | equipment, and other construction services for the project. | |
43 | - | "Design-build entity" means an individual, sole | |
44 | - | proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | |
45 | - | professional corporation, or other entity that proposes to | |
46 | - | design and construct any public project under this Division. | |
47 | - | "Design professional" means an individual, sole | |
48 | - | proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | |
49 | - | professional corporation, or other entity that offers services | |
50 | - | under the Illinois Architecture Practice Act of 1989, the | |
51 | - | Professional Engineering Practice Act of 1989, the Structural | |
52 | - | Engineering Practice Act of 1989, or the Illinois Professional | |
53 | - | Land Surveyor Act of 1989. | |
54 | - | "Evaluation criteria" means the requirements for the | |
55 | - | separate phases of the selection process as defined in this | |
29 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 2 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 2 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
30 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 2 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
31 | + | 1 used on public projects that incorporates the competitive | |
32 | + | 2 bidding process set forth in this Code. | |
33 | + | 3 "Design-build" means a delivery system that provides | |
34 | + | 4 responsibility within a single contract for the furnishing of | |
35 | + | 5 architecture, engineering, land surveying, and related | |
36 | + | 6 services, as required, and the labor, materials, equipment, | |
37 | + | 7 and other construction services for the project. | |
38 | + | 8 "Design-build contract" means a contract for a public | |
39 | + | 9 project under this Division between a municipality and a | |
40 | + | 10 design-build entity to furnish: architecture, engineering, | |
41 | + | 11 land surveying, public art or interpretive exhibits, and | |
42 | + | 12 related services, as required, and the labor, materials, | |
43 | + | 13 equipment, and other construction services for the project. | |
44 | + | 14 "Design-build entity" means an individual, sole | |
45 | + | 15 proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | |
46 | + | 16 professional corporation, or other entity that proposes to | |
47 | + | 17 design and construct any public project under this Division. | |
48 | + | 18 "Design professional" means an individual, sole | |
49 | + | 19 proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | |
50 | + | 20 professional corporation, or other entity that offers services | |
51 | + | 21 under the Illinois Architecture Practice Act of 1989, the | |
52 | + | 22 Professional Engineering Practice Act of 1989, the Structural | |
53 | + | 23 Engineering Practice Act of 1989, or the Illinois Professional | |
54 | + | 24 Land Surveyor Act of 1989. | |
55 | + | 25 "Evaluation criteria" means the requirements for the | |
56 | + | 26 separate phases of the selection process as defined in this | |
56 | 57 | ||
57 | 58 | ||
58 | - | Division and may include the specialized experience, technical | |
59 | - | qualifications and competence, capacity to perform, past | |
60 | - | performance, experience with similar projects, assignment of | |
61 | - | personnel to the project, and other appropriate factors. | |
62 | - | "Proposal" means the offer to enter into a design-build | |
63 | - | contract as submitted by a design-build entity in accordance | |
64 | - | with this Division. | |
65 | - | "Public art designer" means an individual, sole | |
66 | - | proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | |
67 | - | professional corporation, or other entity that has | |
68 | - | demonstrated experience with the design and fabrication of | |
69 | - | public art, including any media that has been planned and | |
70 | - | executed with the intention of being staged in the physical | |
71 | - | public domain outside and accessible to all or any art which is | |
72 | - | exhibited in a public space, including publicly accessible | |
73 | - | buildings, or interpretive exhibits, including communication | |
74 | - | media that is designed to engage, excite, inform, relate, or | |
75 | - | reveal the intrinsic nature or indispensable quality of a | |
76 | - | topic or story being presented. | |
77 | - | "Request for proposal" means the document used by the | |
78 | - | municipality to solicit proposals for a design-build contract. | |
79 | - | "Scope and performance criteria" means the requirements | |
80 | - | for the public project, such as the intended usage, capacity, | |
81 | - | size, scope, quality and performance standards, life-cycle | |
82 | - | costs, and other programmatic criteria that are expressed in | |
83 | - | performance-oriented and quantifiable specifications and | |
84 | 59 | ||
85 | 60 | ||
86 | - | drawings that can be reasonably inferred and are suited to | |
87 | - | allow a design-build entity to develop a proposal. | |
88 | - | (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-15 new) | |
89 | - | Sec. 11-39.2-15. Solicitation of proposals. | |
90 | - | (a) A municipality may enter into design-build contracts. | |
91 | - | In addition to the requirements set forth in its local | |
92 | - | ordinances, when the municipality elects to use the | |
93 | - | design-build delivery method, it must issue a notice of intent | |
94 | - | to receive proposals for the project at least 14 days before | |
95 | - | issuing the request for the proposal. The municipality must | |
96 | - | publish the advance notice in the manner prescribed by | |
97 | - | ordinance, which must include posting the advance notice | |
98 | - | online on its website. The municipality may publish the notice | |
99 | - | in construction industry publications or post the notice on | |
100 | - | construction industry websites. A brief description of the | |
101 | - | proposed procurement must be included in the notice. The | |
102 | - | municipality must provide a copy of the request for proposal | |
103 | - | to any party requesting a copy. | |
104 | - | (b) The request for proposal must be prepared for each | |
105 | - | project and must contain, without limitation, the following | |
106 | - | information: | |
107 | - | (1) The name of the municipality. | |
108 | - | (2) A preliminary schedule for the completion of the | |
109 | - | contract. | |
110 | - | (3) The proposed budget for the project, the source of | |
61 | + | ||
62 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 2 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
111 | 63 | ||
112 | 64 | ||
113 | - | funds, and the currently available funds at the time the | |
114 | - | request for proposal is submitted. | |
115 | - | (4) Prequalification criteria for design-build | |
116 | - | entities wishing to submit proposals. The municipality | |
117 | - | must include, at a minimum, its normal qualifications, | |
118 | - | licensing, registration, and other requirements; however, | |
119 | - | nothing precludes the use of additional prequalification | |
120 | - | criteria by the municipality. | |
121 | - | (5) Material requirements of the contract, such as the | |
122 | - | proposed terms and conditions, required performance and | |
123 | - | payment bonds, insurance, and the entity's plan to comply | |
124 | - | with the utilization goals for business enterprises | |
125 | - | established in the Business Enterprise for Minorities, | |
126 | - | Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act and with Section | |
127 | - | 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. | |
128 | - | (6) The performance criteria. | |
129 | - | (7) The evaluation criteria for each phase of the | |
130 | - | solicitation. Price may not be used as a factor in the | |
131 | - | evaluation of Phase I proposals. | |
132 | - | (8) The number of entities that will be considered for | |
133 | - | the technical and cost evaluation phase. | |
134 | - | (c) The municipality may include any other relevant | |
135 | - | information that it chooses to supply. The design-build entity | |
136 | - | may rely upon the accuracy of this documentation in the | |
137 | - | development of its proposal. | |
138 | - | (d) The date that proposals are due must be at least 21 | |
65 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 3 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 3 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
66 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 3 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
67 | + | 1 Division and may include the specialized experience, technical | |
68 | + | 2 qualifications and competence, capacity to perform, past | |
69 | + | 3 performance, experience with similar projects, assignment of | |
70 | + | 4 personnel to the project, and other appropriate factors. | |
71 | + | 5 "Proposal" means the offer to enter into a design-build | |
72 | + | 6 contract as submitted by a design-build entity in accordance | |
73 | + | 7 with this Division. | |
74 | + | 8 "Public art designer" means an individual, sole | |
75 | + | 9 proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | |
76 | + | 10 professional corporation, or other entity that has | |
77 | + | 11 demonstrated experience with the design and fabrication of | |
78 | + | 12 public art, including any media that has been planned and | |
79 | + | 13 executed with the intention of being staged in the physical | |
80 | + | 14 public domain outside and accessible to all or any art which is | |
81 | + | 15 exhibited in a public space, including publicly accessible | |
82 | + | 16 buildings, or interpretive exhibits, including communication | |
83 | + | 17 media that is designed to engage, excite, inform, relate, or | |
84 | + | 18 reveal the intrinsic nature or indispensable quality of a | |
85 | + | 19 topic or story being presented. | |
86 | + | 20 "Request for proposal" means the document used by the | |
87 | + | 21 municipality to solicit proposals for a design-build contract. | |
88 | + | 22 "Scope and performance criteria" means the requirements | |
89 | + | 23 for the public project, such as the intended usage, capacity, | |
90 | + | 24 size, scope, quality and performance standards, life-cycle | |
91 | + | 25 costs, and other programmatic criteria that are expressed in | |
92 | + | 26 performance-oriented and quantifiable specifications and | |
139 | 93 | ||
140 | 94 | ||
141 | - | calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for | |
142 | - | proposal. If the cost of the project is estimated to exceed | |
143 | - | $12,000,000, then the proposal due date must be at least 28 | |
144 | - | calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for | |
145 | - | proposal. The municipality must include in the request for | |
146 | - | proposal a minimum of 30 days to develop the Phase II | |
147 | - | submissions after the selection of entities from the Phase I | |
148 | - | evaluation is completed. | |
149 | - | (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-20 new) | |
150 | - | Sec. 11-39.2-20. Development of scope and performance | |
151 | - | criteria. | |
152 | - | (a) The municipality must develop, with the assistance of | |
153 | - | a licensed design professional or public art designer, a | |
154 | - | request for proposal, which must include scope and performance | |
155 | - | criteria. The scope and performance criteria must be in | |
156 | - | sufficient detail and contain adequate information to | |
157 | - | reasonably apprise the qualified design-build entities of the | |
158 | - | municipality's overall programmatic needs and goals, including | |
159 | - | criteria and preliminary design plans, general budget | |
160 | - | parameters, schedule, and delivery requirements. | |
161 | - | (b) Each request for proposal must also include a | |
162 | - | description of the level of design to be provided in the | |
163 | - | proposals. This description must include the scope and type of | |
164 | - | renderings, drawings, and specifications that, at a minimum, | |
165 | - | will be required by the municipality to be produced by the | |
166 | 95 | ||
167 | 96 | ||
168 | - | design-build entities. | |
169 | - | (c) The scope and performance criteria must be prepared by | |
170 | - | a design professional or public art designer who is an | |
171 | - | employee of the municipality, or the municipality may contract | |
172 | - | with an independent design professional or public art designer | |
173 | - | selected under the Local Government Professional Services | |
174 | - | Selection Act to provide these services. | |
175 | - | (d) The design professional or public art designer that | |
176 | - | prepares the scope and performance criteria is prohibited from | |
177 | - | participating in any design-build entity proposal for the | |
178 | - | project. | |
179 | - | (e) The design-build contract may be conditioned upon | |
180 | - | subsequent refinements in scope and price and may allow the | |
181 | - | municipality to make modifications in the project scope | |
182 | - | without invalidating the design-build contract. | |
183 | - | (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-25 new) | |
184 | - | Sec. 11-39.2-25. Procedures for Selection. | |
185 | - | (a) The municipality must use a two-phase procedure for | |
186 | - | the selection of the successful design-build entity. Phase I | |
187 | - | of the procedure will evaluate and shortlist the design-build | |
188 | - | entities based on qualifications, and Phase II will evaluate | |
189 | - | the technical and cost proposals. | |
190 | - | (b) The municipality must include in the request for | |
191 | - | proposal the evaluating factors to be used in Phase I. These | |
192 | - | factors are in addition to any prequalification requirements | |
97 | + | ||
98 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 3 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
193 | 99 | ||
194 | 100 | ||
195 | - | of design-build entities that the municipality has set forth. | |
196 | - | Each request for proposal must establish the relative | |
197 | - | importance assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, | |
198 | - | including any weighting of criteria to be employed by the | |
199 | - | municipality. The municipality must maintain a record of the | |
200 | - | evaluation scoring to be disclosed in event of a protest | |
201 | - | regarding the solicitation. | |
202 | - | The municipality must include the following criteria in | |
203 | - | every Phase I evaluation of design-build entities: (i) | |
204 | - | experience of personnel; (ii) successful experience with | |
205 | - | similar project types; (iii) financial capability; (iv) | |
206 | - | timeliness of past performance; (v) experience with similarly | |
207 | - | sized projects; (vi) successful reference checks of the firm; | |
208 | - | (vii) commitment to assign personnel for the duration of the | |
209 | - | project and qualifications of the entity's consultants; and | |
210 | - | (viii) ability or past performance in meeting or exhausting | |
211 | - | good faith efforts to meet the utilization goals for business | |
212 | - | enterprises established in the Business Enterprise for | |
213 | - | Minorities, Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act and with | |
214 | - | Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. The | |
215 | - | municipality may include any additional, relevant criteria in | |
216 | - | Phase I that it deems necessary for a proper qualification | |
217 | - | review. | |
218 | - | The municipality may not consider any design-build entity | |
219 | - | for evaluation or award if the entity has any pecuniary | |
220 | - | interest in the project or has other relationships or | |
101 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 4 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 4 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
102 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 4 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
103 | + | 1 drawings that can be reasonably inferred and are suited to | |
104 | + | 2 allow a design-build entity to develop a proposal. | |
105 | + | 3 (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-15 new) | |
106 | + | 4 Sec. 11-39.2-15. Solicitation of proposals. | |
107 | + | 5 (a) A municipality may enter into design-build contracts. | |
108 | + | 6 In addition to the requirements set forth in its local | |
109 | + | 7 ordinances, when the municipality elects to use the | |
110 | + | 8 design-build delivery method, it must issue a notice of intent | |
111 | + | 9 to receive proposals for the project at least 14 days before | |
112 | + | 10 issuing the request for the proposal. The municipality must | |
113 | + | 11 publish the advance notice in the manner prescribed by | |
114 | + | 12 ordinance, which must include posting the advance notice | |
115 | + | 13 online on its website. The municipality may publish the notice | |
116 | + | 14 in construction industry publications or post the notice on | |
117 | + | 15 construction industry websites. A brief description of the | |
118 | + | 16 proposed procurement must be included in the notice. The | |
119 | + | 17 municipality must provide a copy of the request for proposal | |
120 | + | 18 to any party requesting a copy. | |
121 | + | 19 (b) The request for proposal must be prepared for each | |
122 | + | 20 project and must contain, without limitation, the following | |
123 | + | 21 information: | |
124 | + | 22 (1) The name of the municipality. | |
125 | + | 23 (2) A preliminary schedule for the completion of the | |
126 | + | 24 contract. | |
127 | + | 25 (3) The proposed budget for the project, the source of | |
221 | 128 | ||
222 | 129 | ||
223 | - | circumstances, such as long-term leasehold, mutual | |
224 | - | performance, or development contracts with the municipality, | |
225 | - | that may give the design-build entity a financial or tangible | |
226 | - | advantage over other design-build entities in the preparation, | |
227 | - | evaluation, or performance of the design-build contract or | |
228 | - | that create the appearance of impropriety. No proposal may be | |
229 | - | considered that does not include an entity's plan to comply | |
230 | - | with the requirements established in the Business Enterprise | |
231 | - | for Minorities, Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act, for | |
232 | - | both the design and construction areas of performance, and | |
233 | - | with Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. | |
234 | - | Upon completion of the qualification evaluation, the | |
235 | - | municipality must create a shortlist of the most highly | |
236 | - | qualified design-build entities. The municipality, in its | |
237 | - | discretion, is not required to shortlist the maximum number of | |
238 | - | entities as identified for Phase II evaluation if no less than | |
239 | - | 2 design-build entities nor more than 6 are selected to submit | |
240 | - | Phase II proposals. | |
241 | - | The municipality must notify the entities selected for the | |
242 | - | shortlist in writing. This notification must commence the | |
243 | - | period for the preparation of the Phase II technical and cost | |
244 | - | evaluations. The municipality must allow sufficient time for | |
245 | - | the shortlist entities to prepare their Phase II submittals | |
246 | - | considering the scope and detail requested by the | |
247 | - | municipality. | |
248 | - | (c) The municipality must include in the request for | |
249 | 130 | ||
250 | 131 | ||
251 | - | proposal the evaluating factors to be used in the technical | |
252 | - | and cost submission components of Phase II. Each request for | |
253 | - | proposal must establish, for both the technical and cost | |
254 | - | submission components of Phase II, the relative importance | |
255 | - | assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, including | |
256 | - | any weighting of criteria to be employed by the municipality. | |
257 | - | The municipality must maintain a record of the evaluation | |
258 | - | scoring to be disclosed in event of a protest regarding the | |
259 | - | solicitation. | |
260 | - | The municipality must include the following criteria in | |
261 | - | every Phase II technical evaluation of design-build entities: | |
262 | - | (i) compliance with objectives of the project; (ii) compliance | |
263 | - | of proposed services to the request for proposal requirements; | |
264 | - | (iii) quality of products or materials proposed; (iv) quality | |
265 | - | of design parameters; (v) design concepts; (vi) innovation in | |
266 | - | meeting the scope and performance criteria; and (vii) | |
267 | - | constructability of the proposed project. The municipality may | |
268 | - | include any additional relevant technical evaluation factors | |
269 | - | it deems necessary for proper selection. | |
270 | - | The municipality must include the following criteria in | |
271 | - | every Phase II cost evaluation: the total project cost, the | |
272 | - | construction costs, and the time of completion. The | |
273 | - | municipality may include any additional relevant technical | |
274 | - | evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper selection. | |
275 | - | The total project cost criteria weighting factor may not | |
276 | - | exceed 30%. | |
132 | + | ||
133 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 4 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
277 | 134 | ||
278 | 135 | ||
279 | - | The municipality must directly employ or retain a licensed | |
280 | - | design professional or a public art designer to evaluate the | |
281 | - | technical and cost submissions to determine if the technical | |
282 | - | submissions are in accordance with generally accepted industry | |
283 | - | standards. Upon completion of the technical submissions and | |
284 | - | cost submissions evaluation, the municipality may award the | |
285 | - | design-build contract to the highest overall ranked entity. | |
286 | - | (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-30 new) | |
287 | - | Sec. 11-39.2-30. Small projects. In any case where the | |
288 | - | total overall cost of the project is estimated to be less than | |
289 | - | $12,000,000, the municipality may combine the two-phase | |
290 | - | procedure for selection described in Section 11-39.2-25 into | |
291 | - | one combined step if all the requirements of evaluation are | |
292 | - | performed in accordance with Section 11-39.2-25. | |
293 | - | (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-35 new) | |
294 | - | Sec. 11-39.2-35. Submission of proposals. Proposals must | |
295 | - | be properly identified and sealed. Proposals may not be | |
296 | - | reviewed until after the deadline for submission has passed as | |
297 | - | set forth in the request for proposals. | |
298 | - | Proposals must include a bid bond in the form and security | |
299 | - | as designated in the request for proposals. Proposals must | |
300 | - | also contain a separate sealed envelope with the cost | |
301 | - | information within the overall proposal submission. Proposals | |
302 | - | must include a list of all design professionals, public art | |
136 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 5 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 5 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
137 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 5 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
138 | + | 1 funds, and the currently available funds at the time the | |
139 | + | 2 request for proposal is submitted. | |
140 | + | 3 (4) Prequalification criteria for design-build | |
141 | + | 4 entities wishing to submit proposals. The municipality | |
142 | + | 5 must include, at a minimum, its normal qualifications, | |
143 | + | 6 licensing, registration, and other requirements; however, | |
144 | + | 7 nothing precludes the use of additional prequalification | |
145 | + | 8 criteria by the municipality. | |
146 | + | 9 (5) Material requirements of the contract, such as the | |
147 | + | 10 proposed terms and conditions, required performance and | |
148 | + | 11 payment bonds, insurance, and the entity's plan to comply | |
149 | + | 12 with the utilization goals for business enterprises | |
150 | + | 13 established in the Business Enterprise for Minorities, | |
151 | + | 14 Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act and with Section | |
152 | + | 15 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. | |
153 | + | 16 (6) The performance criteria. | |
154 | + | 17 (7) The evaluation criteria for each phase of the | |
155 | + | 18 solicitation. Price may not be used as a factor in the | |
156 | + | 19 evaluation of Phase I proposals. | |
157 | + | 20 (8) The number of entities that will be considered for | |
158 | + | 21 the technical and cost evaluation phase. | |
159 | + | 22 (c) The municipality may include any other relevant | |
160 | + | 23 information that it chooses to supply. The design-build entity | |
161 | + | 24 may rely upon the accuracy of this documentation in the | |
162 | + | 25 development of its proposal. | |
163 | + | 26 (d) The date that proposals are due must be at least 21 | |
303 | 164 | ||
304 | 165 | ||
305 | - | designers, and other entities to which any work may be | |
306 | - | subcontracted during the performance of the contract. | |
307 | - | Proposals must meet all material requirements of the | |
308 | - | request for proposal or they may be rejected as nonresponsive. | |
309 | - | The municipality may reject any and all proposals. | |
310 | - | The drawings and specifications of the proposal may remain | |
311 | - | the property of the design-build entity. | |
312 | - | The municipality must review the proposals for compliance | |
313 | - | with the performance criteria and evaluation factors. | |
314 | - | Proposals may be withdrawn prior to evaluation for any | |
315 | - | cause. After evaluation begins by the municipality, clear and | |
316 | - | convincing evidence of error is required for withdrawal. | |
317 | - | After a response to a request for qualifications or a | |
318 | - | request for proposal has been submitted as provided in this | |
319 | - | Section, a design-build entity may not replace, remove, or | |
320 | - | otherwise modify any firm identified as a member of the | |
321 | - | proposer's team unless authorized to do so by the | |
322 | - | municipality. | |
323 | - | (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-40 new) | |
324 | - | Sec. 11-39.2-40. Award; performance. The municipality may | |
325 | - | award the contract to the highest overall ranked design-build | |
326 | - | entity. Notice of award must be made in writing. Unsuccessful | |
327 | - | design-build entities must also be notified in writing. The | |
328 | - | municipality may not request a best and final offer after the | |
329 | - | receipt of proposals of all qualified design-build entities. | |
330 | 166 | ||
331 | 167 | ||
332 | - | The municipality may negotiate with the selected design-build | |
333 | - | entity after award, but prior to contract execution, for the | |
334 | - | purpose of securing better terms than originally proposed if | |
335 | - | the salient features of the request for proposal are not | |
336 | - | diminished. | |
337 | - | A design-build entity and associated design professionals | |
338 | - | must conduct themselves in accordance with the relevant laws | |
339 | - | of this State and the related provisions of the Illinois | |
340 | - | Administrative Code. | |
341 | - | (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-45 new) | |
342 | - | Sec. 11-39.2-45. Reports and evaluation. At the end of | |
343 | - | every 6-month period following the contract award, and again | |
344 | - | prior to final contract payout and closure, a selected | |
345 | - | design-build entity must detail, in a written report submitted | |
346 | - | to the municipality, its efforts and success in implementing | |
347 | - | the entity's plan to comply with the utilization goals for | |
348 | - | business enterprises established in the Business Enterprise | |
349 | - | for Minorities, Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act and | |
350 | - | the provisions of Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights | |
351 | - | Act. | |
352 | - | (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-50 new) | |
353 | - | Sec. 11-39.2-50. Exception. Nothing in this Division | |
354 | - | prevents a municipality from using a qualification-based | |
355 | - | selection process for design professionals or construction | |
168 | + | ||
169 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 5 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
356 | 170 | ||
357 | 171 | ||
358 | - | managers for design-build projects. | |
359 | - | (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-55 new) | |
360 | - | Sec. 11-39.2-55. Severability. The provisions of this | |
361 | - | Division are severable under Section 1.31 of the Statute on | |
362 | - | Statutes. | |
363 | - | Section 10. The School Code is amended by adding Article | |
364 | - | 15A as follows: | |
365 | - | (105 ILCS 5/Art. 15A heading new) | |
366 | - | ARTICLE 15A. SCHOOL DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTS | |
367 | - | (105 ILCS 5/15A-1 new) | |
368 | - | Sec. 15A-1. Short title. This Article may be cited as the | |
369 | - | School Design-Build Authorization Law. | |
370 | - | (105 ILCS 5/15A-5 new) | |
371 | - | Sec. 15A-5. Purpose. The purpose of this Article is to | |
372 | - | authorize school districts to use design-build processes to | |
373 | - | increase the efficiency and effectiveness of delivering public | |
374 | - | projects. | |
375 | - | (105 ILCS 5/15A-10 new) | |
376 | - | Sec. 15A-10. Definitions. As used in this Article: | |
377 | - | "Delivery system" means the design and construction | |
172 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 6 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 6 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
173 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 6 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
174 | + | 1 calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for | |
175 | + | 2 proposal. If the cost of the project is estimated to exceed | |
176 | + | 3 $12,000,000, then the proposal due date must be at least 28 | |
177 | + | 4 calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for | |
178 | + | 5 proposal. The municipality must include in the request for | |
179 | + | 6 proposal a minimum of 30 days to develop the Phase II | |
180 | + | 7 submissions after the selection of entities from the Phase I | |
181 | + | 8 evaluation is completed. | |
182 | + | 9 (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-20 new) | |
183 | + | 10 Sec. 11-39.2-20. Development of scope and performance | |
184 | + | 11 criteria. | |
185 | + | 12 (a) The municipality must develop, with the assistance of | |
186 | + | 13 a licensed design professional or public art designer, a | |
187 | + | 14 request for proposal, which must include scope and performance | |
188 | + | 15 criteria. The scope and performance criteria must be in | |
189 | + | 16 sufficient detail and contain adequate information to | |
190 | + | 17 reasonably apprise the qualified design-build entities of the | |
191 | + | 18 municipality's overall programmatic needs and goals, including | |
192 | + | 19 criteria and preliminary design plans, general budget | |
193 | + | 20 parameters, schedule, and delivery requirements. | |
194 | + | 21 (b) Each request for proposal must also include a | |
195 | + | 22 description of the level of design to be provided in the | |
196 | + | 23 proposals. This description must include the scope and type of | |
197 | + | 24 renderings, drawings, and specifications that, at a minimum, | |
198 | + | 25 will be required by the municipality to be produced by the | |
378 | 199 | ||
379 | 200 | ||
380 | - | approach used to develop and construct a project. | |
381 | - | "Design-build" means a delivery system that provides | |
382 | - | responsibility within a single contract for the furnishing of | |
383 | - | architecture, engineering, land surveying, and related | |
384 | - | services, as required, and the labor, materials, equipment, | |
385 | - | and other construction services for the project. | |
386 | - | "Design-build contract" means a contract for a public | |
387 | - | project under this Article between a school district and a | |
388 | - | design-build entity to furnish: architecture, engineering, | |
389 | - | land surveying, public art or interpretive exhibits, and | |
390 | - | related services, as required, and the labor, materials, | |
391 | - | equipment, and other construction services for the project. | |
392 | - | "Design-build entity" means an individual, sole | |
393 | - | proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | |
394 | - | professional corporation, or other entity that proposes to | |
395 | - | design and construct any public project under this Article. | |
396 | - | "Design professional" means an individual, sole | |
397 | - | proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | |
398 | - | professional corporation, or other entity that offers services | |
399 | - | under the Illinois Architecture Practice Act of 1989, the | |
400 | - | Professional Engineering Practice Act of 1989, the Structural | |
401 | - | Engineering Practice Act of 1989, or the Illinois Professional | |
402 | - | Land Surveyor Act of 1989. | |
403 | - | "Evaluation criteria" means the requirements for the | |
404 | - | separate phases of the selection process as set forth in this | |
405 | - | Article and may include the specialized experience, technical | |
406 | 201 | ||
407 | 202 | ||
408 | - | qualifications and competence, capacity to perform, past | |
409 | - | performance, experience with similar projects, assignment of | |
410 | - | personnel to the project, and other appropriate factors. | |
411 | - | "Proposal" means the offer to enter into a design-build | |
412 | - | contract as submitted by a design-build entity in accordance | |
413 | - | with this Article. | |
414 | - | "Public art designer" means an individual, sole | |
415 | - | proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | |
416 | - | professional corporation, or other entity that has | |
417 | - | demonstrated experience with the design and fabrication of | |
418 | - | public art, including any media that has been planned and | |
419 | - | executed with the intention of being staged in the physical | |
420 | - | public domain outside and accessible to all or any art that is | |
421 | - | exhibited in a public space, including publicly accessible | |
422 | - | buildings, or interpretive exhibits, including communication | |
423 | - | media that is designed to engage, excite, inform, relate, or | |
424 | - | reveal the intrinsic nature or indispensable quality of a | |
425 | - | topic or story being presented. | |
426 | - | "Request for proposal" means the document used by the | |
427 | - | school district to solicit proposals for a design-build | |
428 | - | contract. | |
429 | - | "Scope and performance criteria" means the requirements | |
430 | - | for the public project, such as the intended usage, capacity, | |
431 | - | size, scope, quality and performance standards, life-cycle | |
432 | - | costs, and other programmatic criteria that are expressed in | |
433 | - | performance-oriented and quantifiable specifications and | |
203 | + | ||
204 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 6 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
434 | 205 | ||
435 | 206 | ||
436 | - | drawings that can be reasonably inferred and are suited to | |
437 | - | allow a design-build entity to develop a proposal. | |
438 | - | (105 ILCS 5/15A-15 new) | |
439 | - | Sec. 15A-15. Solicitation of proposals. | |
440 | - | (a) A school district may enter into design-build | |
441 | - | contracts. In addition to the requirements set forth by the | |
442 | - | school board, if the school district elects to use the | |
443 | - | design-build delivery method, it must issue a notice of intent | |
444 | - | to receive proposals for the project at least 14 days before | |
445 | - | issuing the request for the proposal. The school district must | |
446 | - | publish the advance notice in the manner prescribed by the | |
447 | - | school board, which must include posting the advance notice | |
448 | - | online on its website. The school district may publish the | |
449 | - | notice in construction industry publications or post the | |
450 | - | notice on construction industry websites. A brief description | |
451 | - | of the proposed procurement must be included in the notice. | |
452 | - | The school district must provide a copy of the request for | |
453 | - | proposal to any party requesting a copy. | |
454 | - | (b) The request for proposal must be prepared for each | |
455 | - | project and must contain, without limitation, the following | |
456 | - | information: | |
457 | - | (1) The name of the school district. | |
458 | - | (2) A preliminary schedule for the completion of the | |
459 | - | contract. | |
460 | - | (3) The proposed budget for the project, the source of | |
207 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 7 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 7 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
208 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 7 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
209 | + | 1 design-build entities. | |
210 | + | 2 (c) The scope and performance criteria must be prepared by | |
211 | + | 3 a design professional or public art designer who is an | |
212 | + | 4 employee of the municipality, or the municipality may contract | |
213 | + | 5 with an independent design professional or public art designer | |
214 | + | 6 selected under the Local Government Professional Services | |
215 | + | 7 Selection Act to provide these services. | |
216 | + | 8 (d) The design professional or public art designer that | |
217 | + | 9 prepares the scope and performance criteria is prohibited from | |
218 | + | 10 participating in any design-build entity proposal for the | |
219 | + | 11 project. | |
220 | + | 12 (e) The design-build contract may be conditioned upon | |
221 | + | 13 subsequent refinements in scope and price and may allow the | |
222 | + | 14 municipality to make modifications in the project scope | |
223 | + | 15 without invalidating the design-build contract. | |
224 | + | 16 (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-25 new) | |
225 | + | 17 Sec. 11-39.2-25. Procedures for Selection. | |
226 | + | 18 (a) The municipality must use a two-phase procedure for | |
227 | + | 19 the selection of the successful design-build entity. Phase I | |
228 | + | 20 of the procedure will evaluate and shortlist the design-build | |
229 | + | 21 entities based on qualifications, and Phase II will evaluate | |
230 | + | 22 the technical and cost proposals. | |
231 | + | 23 (b) The municipality must include in the request for | |
232 | + | 24 proposal the evaluating factors to be used in Phase I. These | |
233 | + | 25 factors are in addition to any prequalification requirements | |
461 | 234 | ||
462 | 235 | ||
463 | - | funds, and the currently available funds at the time the | |
464 | - | request for proposal is submitted. | |
465 | - | (4) Prequalification criteria for design-build | |
466 | - | entities wishing to submit proposals. The school district | |
467 | - | must include, at a minimum, its normal qualifications, | |
468 | - | licensing, registration, and other requirements; however, | |
469 | - | nothing precludes the use of additional prequalification | |
470 | - | criteria by the school district. | |
471 | - | (5) Material requirements of the contract, such as the | |
472 | - | proposed terms and conditions, required performance and | |
473 | - | payment bonds, insurance, and the entity's plan to comply | |
474 | - | with the utilization goals for business enterprises | |
475 | - | established in the Business Enterprise for Minorities, | |
476 | - | Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act and with Section | |
477 | - | 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. | |
478 | - | (6) The performance criteria. | |
479 | - | (7) The evaluation criteria for each phase of the | |
480 | - | solicitation. Price may not be used as a factor in the | |
481 | - | evaluation of Phase I proposals. | |
482 | - | (8) The number of entities that will be considered for | |
483 | - | the technical and cost evaluation phase. | |
484 | - | (c) The school district may include any other relevant | |
485 | - | information that it chooses to supply. The design-build entity | |
486 | - | may rely upon the accuracy of this documentation in the | |
487 | - | development of its proposal. | |
488 | - | (d) The date that proposals are due must be at least 21 | |
489 | 236 | ||
490 | 237 | ||
491 | - | calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for | |
492 | - | proposal. If the cost of the project is estimated to exceed | |
493 | - | $12,000,000, then the proposal due date must be at least 28 | |
494 | - | calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for | |
495 | - | proposal. The school district must include in the request for | |
496 | - | proposal a minimum of 30 days to develop the Phase II | |
497 | - | submissions after the selection of entities from the Phase I | |
498 | - | evaluation is completed. | |
499 | - | (105 ILCS 5/15A-20 new) | |
500 | - | Sec. 15A-20. Development of scope and performance | |
501 | - | criteria. | |
502 | - | (a) The school district must develop, with the assistance | |
503 | - | of a licensed design professional or public art designer, a | |
504 | - | request for proposal, which must include scope and performance | |
505 | - | criteria. The scope and performance criteria must be in | |
506 | - | sufficient detail and contain adequate information to | |
507 | - | reasonably apprise the qualified design-build entities of the | |
508 | - | school district's overall programmatic needs and goals, | |
509 | - | including criteria, general budget parameters, schedule, and | |
510 | - | delivery requirements. | |
511 | - | (b) Each request for proposal must also include a | |
512 | - | description of the level of design to be provided in the | |
513 | - | proposals. This description must include the scope and type of | |
514 | - | renderings, drawings, and specifications that, at a minimum, | |
515 | - | will be required by the school district to be produced by the | |
238 | + | ||
239 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 7 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
516 | 240 | ||
517 | 241 | ||
518 | - | design-build entities. | |
519 | - | (c) The scope and performance criteria must be prepared by | |
520 | - | a design professional or public art designer who is an | |
521 | - | employee of the school district, or the school district may | |
522 | - | contract with an independent design professional or public art | |
523 | - | designer selected under the Local Government Professional | |
524 | - | Services Selection Act to provide these services. | |
525 | - | (d) The design professional or public art designer that | |
526 | - | prepares the scope and performance criteria is prohibited from | |
527 | - | participating in any design-build entity proposal for the | |
528 | - | project. | |
529 | - | (e) The design-build contract may be conditioned upon | |
530 | - | subsequent refinements in scope and price and may allow the | |
531 | - | school district to make modifications in the project scope | |
532 | - | without invalidating the design-build contract. | |
533 | - | (105 ILCS 5/15A-25 new) | |
534 | - | Sec. 15A-25. Procedures for selection. | |
535 | - | (a) The school district must use a 2-phase procedure for | |
536 | - | the selection of the successful design-build entity. Phase I | |
537 | - | of the procedure must evaluate and shortlist the design-build | |
538 | - | entities based on qualifications, and Phase II must evaluate | |
539 | - | the technical and cost proposals. | |
540 | - | (b) The school district must include in the request for | |
541 | - | proposal the evaluating factors to be used in Phase I. These | |
542 | - | factors are in addition to any prequalification requirements | |
242 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 8 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 8 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
243 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 8 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
244 | + | 1 of design-build entities that the municipality has set forth. | |
245 | + | 2 Each request for proposal must establish the relative | |
246 | + | 3 importance assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, | |
247 | + | 4 including any weighting of criteria to be employed by the | |
248 | + | 5 municipality. The municipality must maintain a record of the | |
249 | + | 6 evaluation scoring to be disclosed in event of a protest | |
250 | + | 7 regarding the solicitation. | |
251 | + | 8 The municipality must include the following criteria in | |
252 | + | 9 every Phase I evaluation of design-build entities: (i) | |
253 | + | 10 experience of personnel; (ii) successful experience with | |
254 | + | 11 similar project types; (iii) financial capability; (iv) | |
255 | + | 12 timeliness of past performance; (v) experience with similarly | |
256 | + | 13 sized projects; (vi) successful reference checks of the firm; | |
257 | + | 14 (vii) commitment to assign personnel for the duration of the | |
258 | + | 15 project and qualifications of the entity's consultants; and | |
259 | + | 16 (viii) ability or past performance in meeting or exhausting | |
260 | + | 17 good faith efforts to meet the utilization goals for business | |
261 | + | 18 enterprises established in the Business Enterprise for | |
262 | + | 19 Minorities, Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act and with | |
263 | + | 20 Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. The | |
264 | + | 21 municipality may include any additional, relevant criteria in | |
265 | + | 22 Phase I that it deems necessary for a proper qualification | |
266 | + | 23 review. | |
267 | + | 24 The municipality may not consider any design-build entity | |
268 | + | 25 for evaluation or award if the entity has any pecuniary | |
269 | + | 26 interest in the project or has other relationships or | |
543 | 270 | ||
544 | 271 | ||
545 | - | of design-build entities that the school district has set | |
546 | - | forth. Each request for proposal must establish the relative | |
547 | - | importance assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, | |
548 | - | including any weighting of criteria to be employed by the | |
549 | - | school district. The school district must maintain a record of | |
550 | - | the evaluation scoring to be disclosed in event of a protest | |
551 | - | regarding the solicitation. | |
552 | - | The school district must include the following criteria in | |
553 | - | every Phase I evaluation of design-build entities: | |
554 | - | (1) experience of personnel; | |
555 | - | (2) successful experience with similar project types; | |
556 | - | (3) financial capability; | |
557 | - | (4) timeliness of past performance; | |
558 | - | (5) experience with similarly sized projects; | |
559 | - | (6) successful reference checks of the firm; | |
560 | - | (7) commitment to assign personnel for the duration of | |
561 | - | the project and qualifications of the entity's | |
562 | - | consultants; and | |
563 | - | (8) ability or past performance in meeting or | |
564 | - | exhausting good faith efforts to meet the utilization | |
565 | - | goals for business enterprises established in the Business | |
566 | - | Enterprise for Minorities, Women, and Persons with | |
567 | - | Disabilities Act and with Section 2-105 of the Illinois | |
568 | - | Human Rights Act. | |
569 | - | The school district may include any additional, relevant | |
570 | - | criteria in Phase I that it deems necessary for a proper | |
571 | 272 | ||
572 | 273 | ||
573 | - | qualification review. | |
574 | - | The school district may not consider a design-build entity | |
575 | - | for evaluation or an award if the entity has any pecuniary | |
576 | - | interest in the project or has other relationships or | |
577 | - | circumstances, such as long-term leasehold, mutual | |
578 | - | performance, or development contracts with the school | |
579 | - | district, that may give the design-build entity a financial or | |
580 | - | tangible advantage over other design-build entities in the | |
581 | - | preparation, evaluation, or performance of the design-build | |
582 | - | contract or that create the appearance of impropriety. A | |
583 | - | design-build entity shall not be disqualified under this | |
584 | - | Section solely due to having previously been awarded a project | |
585 | - | or projects under any applicable public procurement law of the | |
586 | - | State. No proposal may be considered that does not include an | |
587 | - | entity's plan to comply with the requirements established in | |
588 | - | the Business Enterprise for Minorities, Women, and Persons | |
589 | - | with Disabilities Act, for both the design and construction | |
590 | - | areas of performance, and with Section 2-105 of the Illinois | |
591 | - | Human Rights Act. | |
592 | - | Upon completion of the qualification evaluation, the | |
593 | - | school district must create a shortlist of the most highly | |
594 | - | qualified design-build entities. The school district, in its | |
595 | - | discretion, is not required to shortlist the maximum number of | |
596 | - | entities as identified for Phase II evaluation if no less than | |
597 | - | 2 design-build entities nor more than 6 are selected to submit | |
598 | - | Phase II proposals. If a school district receives one response | |
274 | + | ||
275 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 8 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
599 | 276 | ||
600 | 277 | ||
601 | - | to Phase I, nothing herein shall prohibit the school district | |
602 | - | from proceeding with a Phase II evaluation of the single | |
603 | - | respondent, if the school district, in its discretion, finds | |
604 | - | proceeding to be in its best interest. | |
605 | - | The school district must notify the entities selected for | |
606 | - | the shortlist in writing. This notification must commence the | |
607 | - | period for the preparation of the Phase II technical and cost | |
608 | - | evaluations. The school district must allow sufficient time | |
609 | - | for the shortlist entities to prepare their Phase II | |
610 | - | submittals considering the scope and detail requested by the | |
611 | - | school district. | |
612 | - | (c) The school district must include in the request for | |
613 | - | proposal the evaluating factors to be used in the technical | |
614 | - | and cost submission components of Phase II. Each request for | |
615 | - | proposal must establish, for both the technical and cost | |
616 | - | submission components of Phase II, the relative importance | |
617 | - | assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, including | |
618 | - | any weighting of criteria to be employed by the school | |
619 | - | district. The school district must maintain a record of the | |
620 | - | evaluation scoring to be disclosed in event of a protest | |
621 | - | regarding the solicitation. | |
622 | - | The school district must include the following criteria in | |
623 | - | every Phase II technical evaluation of design-build entities: | |
624 | - | (1) compliance with objectives of the project; | |
625 | - | (2) compliance of proposed services to the request for | |
626 | - | proposal requirements; | |
278 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 9 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 9 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
279 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 9 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
280 | + | 1 circumstances, such as long-term leasehold, mutual | |
281 | + | 2 performance, or development contracts with the municipality, | |
282 | + | 3 that may give the design-build entity a financial or tangible | |
283 | + | 4 advantage over other design-build entities in the preparation, | |
284 | + | 5 evaluation, or performance of the design-build contract or | |
285 | + | 6 that create the appearance of impropriety. No proposal may be | |
286 | + | 7 considered that does not include an entity's plan to comply | |
287 | + | 8 with the requirements established in the Business Enterprise | |
288 | + | 9 for Minorities, Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act, for | |
289 | + | 10 both the design and construction areas of performance, and | |
290 | + | 11 with Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. | |
291 | + | 12 Upon completion of the qualification evaluation, the | |
292 | + | 13 municipality must create a shortlist of the most highly | |
293 | + | 14 qualified design-build entities. The municipality, in its | |
294 | + | 15 discretion, is not required to shortlist the maximum number of | |
295 | + | 16 entities as identified for Phase II evaluation if no less than | |
296 | + | 17 2 design-build entities nor more than 6 are selected to submit | |
297 | + | 18 Phase II proposals. | |
298 | + | 19 The municipality must notify the entities selected for the | |
299 | + | 20 shortlist in writing. This notification must commence the | |
300 | + | 21 period for the preparation of the Phase II technical and cost | |
301 | + | 22 evaluations. The municipality must allow sufficient time for | |
302 | + | 23 the shortlist entities to prepare their Phase II submittals | |
303 | + | 24 considering the scope and detail requested by the | |
304 | + | 25 municipality. | |
305 | + | 26 (c) The municipality must include in the request for | |
627 | 306 | ||
628 | 307 | ||
629 | - | (3) quality of products or materials proposed; | |
630 | - | (4) quality of design parameters; | |
631 | - | (5) design concepts; | |
632 | - | (6) innovation in meeting the scope and performance | |
633 | - | criteria; and | |
634 | - | (7) constructability of the proposed project. | |
635 | - | The school district may include any additional relevant | |
636 | - | technical evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper | |
637 | - | selection. | |
638 | - | The school district must include the following criteria in | |
639 | - | every Phase II cost evaluation: the total project cost, the | |
640 | - | construction costs, and the time of completion. The school | |
641 | - | district may include any additional relevant technical | |
642 | - | evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper selection. | |
643 | - | The total project cost criteria weighting factor may not | |
644 | - | exceed 30%. | |
645 | - | The school district must directly employ or retain a | |
646 | - | licensed design professional or a public art designer to | |
647 | - | evaluate the technical and cost submissions to determine if | |
648 | - | the technical submissions are in accordance with generally | |
649 | - | accepted industry standards. Upon completion of the technical | |
650 | - | submissions and cost submissions evaluation, the school | |
651 | - | district may award the design-build contract to the highest | |
652 | - | overall ranked entity. | |
653 | - | (105 ILCS 5/15A-30 new) | |
654 | 308 | ||
655 | 309 | ||
656 | - | Sec. 15A-30. Small projects. In any case in which the | |
657 | - | total overall cost of the project is estimated to be | |
658 | - | $12,000,000 or less, the school district may combine the | |
659 | - | 2-phase procedure for selection described in Section 15A-25 | |
660 | - | into one combined step if all the requirements of evaluation | |
661 | - | are performed in accordance with Section 15A-25. | |
662 | - | (105 ILCS 5/15A-35 new) | |
663 | - | Sec. 15A-35. Submission of proposals. Proposals must be | |
664 | - | properly identified and sealed. Proposals may not be reviewed | |
665 | - | until after the deadline for submission has passed as set | |
666 | - | forth in the request for proposal. | |
667 | - | Proposals must include a bid bond in the form and security | |
668 | - | as designated in the request for proposal. Proposals must also | |
669 | - | contain a separate sealed envelope with the cost information | |
670 | - | within the overall proposal submission. Proposals must include | |
671 | - | a list of all design professionals, public art designers, and | |
672 | - | other entities to which any work may be subcontracted during | |
673 | - | the performance of the contract. | |
674 | - | Proposals must meet all material requirements of the | |
675 | - | request for proposal, or they may be rejected as | |
676 | - | nonresponsive. The school district may reject any and all | |
677 | - | proposals. | |
678 | - | The drawings and specifications of the proposal may remain | |
679 | - | the property of the design-build entity. | |
680 | - | The school district must review the proposals for | |
310 | + | ||
311 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 9 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
681 | 312 | ||
682 | 313 | ||
683 | - | compliance with the performance criteria and evaluation | |
684 | - | factors. | |
685 | - | Proposals may be withdrawn prior to evaluation for any | |
686 | - | cause. After evaluation begins by the school district, clear | |
687 | - | and convincing evidence of error is required for withdrawal. | |
688 | - | After a response to a request for qualifications or a | |
689 | - | request for proposal has been submitted under this Section, a | |
690 | - | design-build entity may not replace, remove, or otherwise | |
691 | - | modify any firm identified as a member of the proposer's team | |
692 | - | unless authorized to do so by the school district. | |
693 | - | (105 ILCS 5/15A-40 new) | |
694 | - | Sec. 15A-40. Award; performance. The school district may | |
695 | - | award the contract to the highest overall ranked design-build | |
696 | - | entity. Notice of award must be made in writing. Unsuccessful | |
697 | - | design-build entities must also be notified in writing. The | |
698 | - | school district may not request a best and final offer after | |
699 | - | the receipt of proposals of all qualified design-build | |
700 | - | entities. The school district may negotiate with the selected | |
701 | - | design-build entity after the award, but prior to contract | |
702 | - | execution, for the purpose of securing better terms than | |
703 | - | originally proposed if the salient features of the request for | |
704 | - | proposal are not diminished. | |
705 | - | A design-build entity and associated design professionals | |
706 | - | must conduct themselves in accordance with the relevant laws | |
707 | - | of this State and the related provisions of the Illinois | |
314 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 10 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 10 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
315 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 10 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
316 | + | 1 proposal the evaluating factors to be used in the technical | |
317 | + | 2 and cost submission components of Phase II. Each request for | |
318 | + | 3 proposal must establish, for both the technical and cost | |
319 | + | 4 submission components of Phase II, the relative importance | |
320 | + | 5 assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, including | |
321 | + | 6 any weighting of criteria to be employed by the municipality. | |
322 | + | 7 The municipality must maintain a record of the evaluation | |
323 | + | 8 scoring to be disclosed in event of a protest regarding the | |
324 | + | 9 solicitation. | |
325 | + | 10 The municipality must include the following criteria in | |
326 | + | 11 every Phase II technical evaluation of design-build entities: | |
327 | + | 12 (i) compliance with objectives of the project; (ii) compliance | |
328 | + | 13 of proposed services to the request for proposal requirements; | |
329 | + | 14 (iii) quality of products or materials proposed; (iv) quality | |
330 | + | 15 of design parameters; (v) design concepts; (vi) innovation in | |
331 | + | 16 meeting the scope and performance criteria; and (vii) | |
332 | + | 17 constructability of the proposed project. The municipality may | |
333 | + | 18 include any additional relevant technical evaluation factors | |
334 | + | 19 it deems necessary for proper selection. | |
335 | + | 20 The municipality must include the following criteria in | |
336 | + | 21 every Phase II cost evaluation: the total project cost, the | |
337 | + | 22 construction costs, and the time of completion. The | |
338 | + | 23 municipality may include any additional relevant technical | |
339 | + | 24 evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper selection. | |
340 | + | 25 The total project cost criteria weighting factor may not | |
341 | + | 26 exceed 30%. | |
708 | 342 | ||
709 | 343 | ||
710 | - | Administrative Code. | |
711 | - | (105 ILCS 5/15A-45 new) | |
712 | - | Sec. 15A-45. Evaluation and report. At the end of every | |
713 | - | 6-month period following the contract award, and again prior | |
714 | - | to final contract payout and closure, a selected design-build | |
715 | - | entity must detail, in a written report submitted to the | |
716 | - | school district, its efforts and success in implementing the | |
717 | - | entity's plan to comply with the utilization goals for | |
718 | - | business enterprises established in the Business Enterprise | |
719 | - | for Minorities, Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act and | |
720 | - | the provisions of Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights | |
721 | - | Act. | |
722 | - | (105 ILCS 5/15A-50 new) | |
723 | - | Sec. 15A-50. Exception. Nothing in this Article prevents a | |
724 | - | school district from using a qualification-based selection | |
725 | - | process for design professionals or construction managers for | |
726 | - | design-build projects. | |
727 | - | (105 ILCS 5/15A-90 new) | |
728 | - | Sec. 15A-90. Severability. The provisions of this Article | |
729 | - | are severable under Section 1.31 of the Statute on Statutes. | |
344 | + | ||
345 | + | ||
346 | + | ||
347 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 10 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
348 | + | ||
349 | + | ||
350 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 11 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 11 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
351 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 11 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
352 | + | 1 The municipality must directly employ or retain a licensed | |
353 | + | 2 design professional or a public art designer to evaluate the | |
354 | + | 3 technical and cost submissions to determine if the technical | |
355 | + | 4 submissions are in accordance with generally accepted industry | |
356 | + | 5 standards. Upon completion of the technical submissions and | |
357 | + | 6 cost submissions evaluation, the municipality may award the | |
358 | + | 7 design-build contract to the highest overall ranked entity. | |
359 | + | 8 (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-30 new) | |
360 | + | 9 Sec. 11-39.2-30. Small projects. In any case where the | |
361 | + | 10 total overall cost of the project is estimated to be less than | |
362 | + | 11 $12,000,000, the municipality may combine the two-phase | |
363 | + | 12 procedure for selection described in Section 11-39.2-25 into | |
364 | + | 13 one combined step if all the requirements of evaluation are | |
365 | + | 14 performed in accordance with Section 11-39.2-25. | |
366 | + | 15 (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-35 new) | |
367 | + | 16 Sec. 11-39.2-35. Submission of proposals. Proposals must | |
368 | + | 17 be properly identified and sealed. Proposals may not be | |
369 | + | 18 reviewed until after the deadline for submission has passed as | |
370 | + | 19 set forth in the request for proposals. | |
371 | + | 20 Proposals must include a bid bond in the form and security | |
372 | + | 21 as designated in the request for proposals. Proposals must | |
373 | + | 22 also contain a separate sealed envelope with the cost | |
374 | + | 23 information within the overall proposal submission. Proposals | |
375 | + | 24 must include a list of all design professionals, public art | |
376 | + | ||
377 | + | ||
378 | + | ||
379 | + | ||
380 | + | ||
381 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 11 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
382 | + | ||
383 | + | ||
384 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 12 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 12 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
385 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 12 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
386 | + | 1 designers, and other entities to which any work may be | |
387 | + | 2 subcontracted during the performance of the contract. | |
388 | + | 3 Proposals must meet all material requirements of the | |
389 | + | 4 request for proposal or they may be rejected as nonresponsive. | |
390 | + | 5 The municipality may reject any and all proposals. | |
391 | + | 6 The drawings and specifications of the proposal may remain | |
392 | + | 7 the property of the design-build entity. | |
393 | + | 8 The municipality must review the proposals for compliance | |
394 | + | 9 with the performance criteria and evaluation factors. | |
395 | + | 10 Proposals may be withdrawn prior to evaluation for any | |
396 | + | 11 cause. After evaluation begins by the municipality, clear and | |
397 | + | 12 convincing evidence of error is required for withdrawal. | |
398 | + | 13 After a response to a request for qualifications or a | |
399 | + | 14 request for proposal has been submitted as provided in this | |
400 | + | 15 Section, a design-build entity may not replace, remove, or | |
401 | + | 16 otherwise modify any firm identified as a member of the | |
402 | + | 17 proposer's team unless authorized to do so by the | |
403 | + | 18 municipality. | |
404 | + | 19 (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-40 new) | |
405 | + | 20 Sec. 11-39.2-40. Award; performance. The municipality may | |
406 | + | 21 award the contract to the highest overall ranked design-build | |
407 | + | 22 entity. Notice of award must be made in writing. Unsuccessful | |
408 | + | 23 design-build entities must also be notified in writing. The | |
409 | + | 24 municipality may not request a best and final offer after the | |
410 | + | 25 receipt of proposals of all qualified design-build entities. | |
411 | + | ||
412 | + | ||
413 | + | ||
414 | + | ||
415 | + | ||
416 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 12 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
417 | + | ||
418 | + | ||
419 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 13 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 13 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
420 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 13 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
421 | + | 1 The municipality may negotiate with the selected design-build | |
422 | + | 2 entity after award, but prior to contract execution, for the | |
423 | + | 3 purpose of securing better terms than originally proposed if | |
424 | + | 4 the salient features of the request for proposal are not | |
425 | + | 5 diminished. | |
426 | + | 6 A design-build entity and associated design professionals | |
427 | + | 7 must conduct themselves in accordance with the relevant laws | |
428 | + | 8 of this State and the related provisions of the Illinois | |
429 | + | 9 Administrative Code. | |
430 | + | 10 (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-45 new) | |
431 | + | 11 Sec. 11-39.2-45. Reports and evaluation. At the end of | |
432 | + | 12 every 6-month period following the contract award, and again | |
433 | + | 13 prior to final contract payout and closure, a selected | |
434 | + | 14 design-build entity must detail, in a written report submitted | |
435 | + | 15 to the municipality, its efforts and success in implementing | |
436 | + | 16 the entity's plan to comply with the utilization goals for | |
437 | + | 17 business enterprises established in the Business Enterprise | |
438 | + | 18 for Minorities, Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act and | |
439 | + | 19 the provisions of Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights | |
440 | + | 20 Act. | |
441 | + | 21 (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-50 new) | |
442 | + | 22 Sec. 11-39.2-50. Exception. Nothing in this Division | |
443 | + | 23 prevents a municipality from using a qualification-based | |
444 | + | 24 selection process for design professionals or construction | |
445 | + | ||
446 | + | ||
447 | + | ||
448 | + | ||
449 | + | ||
450 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 13 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
451 | + | ||
452 | + | ||
453 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 14 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 14 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
454 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 14 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
455 | + | 1 managers for design-build projects. | |
456 | + | 2 (65 ILCS 5/11-39.2-55 new) | |
457 | + | 3 Sec. 11-39.2-55. Severability. The provisions of this | |
458 | + | 4 Division are severable under Section 1.31 of the Statute on | |
459 | + | 5 Statutes. | |
460 | + | 6 Section 10. The School Code is amended by adding Article | |
461 | + | 7 15A as follows: | |
462 | + | 8 (105 ILCS 5/Art. 15A heading new) | |
463 | + | 9 ARTICLE 15A. SCHOOL DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTS | |
464 | + | 10 (105 ILCS 5/15A-1 new) | |
465 | + | 11 Sec. 15A-1. Short title. This Article may be cited as the | |
466 | + | 12 School Design-Build Authorization Law. | |
467 | + | 13 (105 ILCS 5/15A-5 new) | |
468 | + | 14 Sec. 15A-5. Purpose. The purpose of this Article is to | |
469 | + | 15 authorize school districts to use design-build processes to | |
470 | + | 16 increase the efficiency and effectiveness of delivering public | |
471 | + | 17 projects. | |
472 | + | 18 (105 ILCS 5/15A-10 new) | |
473 | + | 19 Sec. 15A-10. Definitions. As used in this Article: | |
474 | + | 20 "Delivery system" means the design and construction | |
475 | + | ||
476 | + | ||
477 | + | ||
478 | + | ||
479 | + | ||
480 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 14 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
481 | + | ||
482 | + | ||
483 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 15 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 15 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
484 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 15 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
485 | + | 1 approach used to develop and construct a project. | |
486 | + | 2 "Design-build" means a delivery system that provides | |
487 | + | 3 responsibility within a single contract for the furnishing of | |
488 | + | 4 architecture, engineering, land surveying, and related | |
489 | + | 5 services, as required, and the labor, materials, equipment, | |
490 | + | 6 and other construction services for the project. | |
491 | + | 7 "Design-build contract" means a contract for a public | |
492 | + | 8 project under this Article between a school district and a | |
493 | + | 9 design-build entity to furnish: architecture, engineering, | |
494 | + | 10 land surveying, public art or interpretive exhibits, and | |
495 | + | 11 related services, as required, and the labor, materials, | |
496 | + | 12 equipment, and other construction services for the project. | |
497 | + | 13 "Design-build entity" means an individual, sole | |
498 | + | 14 proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | |
499 | + | 15 professional corporation, or other entity that proposes to | |
500 | + | 16 design and construct any public project under this Article. | |
501 | + | 17 "Design professional" means an individual, sole | |
502 | + | 18 proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | |
503 | + | 19 professional corporation, or other entity that offers services | |
504 | + | 20 under the Illinois Architecture Practice Act of 1989, the | |
505 | + | 21 Professional Engineering Practice Act of 1989, the Structural | |
506 | + | 22 Engineering Practice Act of 1989, or the Illinois Professional | |
507 | + | 23 Land Surveyor Act of 1989. | |
508 | + | 24 "Evaluation criteria" means the requirements for the | |
509 | + | 25 separate phases of the selection process as set forth in this | |
510 | + | 26 Article and may include the specialized experience, technical | |
511 | + | ||
512 | + | ||
513 | + | ||
514 | + | ||
515 | + | ||
516 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 15 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
517 | + | ||
518 | + | ||
519 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 16 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 16 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
520 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 16 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
521 | + | 1 qualifications and competence, capacity to perform, past | |
522 | + | 2 performance, experience with similar projects, assignment of | |
523 | + | 3 personnel to the project, and other appropriate factors. | |
524 | + | 4 "Proposal" means the offer to enter into a design-build | |
525 | + | 5 contract as submitted by a design-build entity in accordance | |
526 | + | 6 with this Article. | |
527 | + | 7 "Public art designer" means an individual, sole | |
528 | + | 8 proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, corporation, | |
529 | + | 9 professional corporation, or other entity that has | |
530 | + | 10 demonstrated experience with the design and fabrication of | |
531 | + | 11 public art, including any media that has been planned and | |
532 | + | 12 executed with the intention of being staged in the physical | |
533 | + | 13 public domain outside and accessible to all or any art that is | |
534 | + | 14 exhibited in a public space, including publicly accessible | |
535 | + | 15 buildings, or interpretive exhibits, including communication | |
536 | + | 16 media that is designed to engage, excite, inform, relate, or | |
537 | + | 17 reveal the intrinsic nature or indispensable quality of a | |
538 | + | 18 topic or story being presented. | |
539 | + | 19 "Request for proposal" means the document used by the | |
540 | + | 20 school district to solicit proposals for a design-build | |
541 | + | 21 contract. | |
542 | + | 22 "Scope and performance criteria" means the requirements | |
543 | + | 23 for the public project, such as the intended usage, capacity, | |
544 | + | 24 size, scope, quality and performance standards, life-cycle | |
545 | + | 25 costs, and other programmatic criteria that are expressed in | |
546 | + | 26 performance-oriented and quantifiable specifications and | |
547 | + | ||
548 | + | ||
549 | + | ||
550 | + | ||
551 | + | ||
552 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 16 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
553 | + | ||
554 | + | ||
555 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 17 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 17 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
556 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 17 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
557 | + | 1 drawings that can be reasonably inferred and are suited to | |
558 | + | 2 allow a design-build entity to develop a proposal. | |
559 | + | 3 (105 ILCS 5/15A-15 new) | |
560 | + | 4 Sec. 15A-15. Solicitation of proposals. | |
561 | + | 5 (a) A school district may enter into design-build | |
562 | + | 6 contracts. In addition to the requirements set forth by the | |
563 | + | 7 school board, if the school district elects to use the | |
564 | + | 8 design-build delivery method, it must issue a notice of intent | |
565 | + | 9 to receive proposals for the project at least 14 days before | |
566 | + | 10 issuing the request for the proposal. The school district must | |
567 | + | 11 publish the advance notice in the manner prescribed by the | |
568 | + | 12 school board, which must include posting the advance notice | |
569 | + | 13 online on its website. The school district may publish the | |
570 | + | 14 notice in construction industry publications or post the | |
571 | + | 15 notice on construction industry websites. A brief description | |
572 | + | 16 of the proposed procurement must be included in the notice. | |
573 | + | 17 The school district must provide a copy of the request for | |
574 | + | 18 proposal to any party requesting a copy. | |
575 | + | 19 (b) The request for proposal must be prepared for each | |
576 | + | 20 project and must contain, without limitation, the following | |
577 | + | 21 information: | |
578 | + | 22 (1) The name of the school district. | |
579 | + | 23 (2) A preliminary schedule for the completion of the | |
580 | + | 24 contract. | |
581 | + | 25 (3) The proposed budget for the project, the source of | |
582 | + | ||
583 | + | ||
584 | + | ||
585 | + | ||
586 | + | ||
587 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 17 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
588 | + | ||
589 | + | ||
590 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 18 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 18 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
591 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 18 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
592 | + | 1 funds, and the currently available funds at the time the | |
593 | + | 2 request for proposal is submitted. | |
594 | + | 3 (4) Prequalification criteria for design-build | |
595 | + | 4 entities wishing to submit proposals. The school district | |
596 | + | 5 must include, at a minimum, its normal qualifications, | |
597 | + | 6 licensing, registration, and other requirements; however, | |
598 | + | 7 nothing precludes the use of additional prequalification | |
599 | + | 8 criteria by the school district. | |
600 | + | 9 (5) Material requirements of the contract, such as the | |
601 | + | 10 proposed terms and conditions, required performance and | |
602 | + | 11 payment bonds, insurance, and the entity's plan to comply | |
603 | + | 12 with the utilization goals for business enterprises | |
604 | + | 13 established in the Business Enterprise for Minorities, | |
605 | + | 14 Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act and with Section | |
606 | + | 15 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act. | |
607 | + | 16 (6) The performance criteria. | |
608 | + | 17 (7) The evaluation criteria for each phase of the | |
609 | + | 18 solicitation. Price may not be used as a factor in the | |
610 | + | 19 evaluation of Phase I proposals. | |
611 | + | 20 (8) The number of entities that will be considered for | |
612 | + | 21 the technical and cost evaluation phase. | |
613 | + | 22 (c) The school district may include any other relevant | |
614 | + | 23 information that it chooses to supply. The design-build entity | |
615 | + | 24 may rely upon the accuracy of this documentation in the | |
616 | + | 25 development of its proposal. | |
617 | + | 26 (d) The date that proposals are due must be at least 21 | |
618 | + | ||
619 | + | ||
620 | + | ||
621 | + | ||
622 | + | ||
623 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 18 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
624 | + | ||
625 | + | ||
626 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 19 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 19 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
627 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 19 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
628 | + | 1 calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for | |
629 | + | 2 proposal. If the cost of the project is estimated to exceed | |
630 | + | 3 $12,000,000, then the proposal due date must be at least 28 | |
631 | + | 4 calendar days after the date of the issuance of the request for | |
632 | + | 5 proposal. The school district must include in the request for | |
633 | + | 6 proposal a minimum of 30 days to develop the Phase II | |
634 | + | 7 submissions after the selection of entities from the Phase I | |
635 | + | 8 evaluation is completed. | |
636 | + | 9 (105 ILCS 5/15A-20 new) | |
637 | + | 10 Sec. 15A-20. Development of scope and performance | |
638 | + | 11 criteria. | |
639 | + | 12 (a) The school district must develop, with the assistance | |
640 | + | 13 of a licensed design professional or public art designer, a | |
641 | + | 14 request for proposal, which must include scope and performance | |
642 | + | 15 criteria. The scope and performance criteria must be in | |
643 | + | 16 sufficient detail and contain adequate information to | |
644 | + | 17 reasonably apprise the qualified design-build entities of the | |
645 | + | 18 school district's overall programmatic needs and goals, | |
646 | + | 19 including criteria, general budget parameters, schedule, and | |
647 | + | 20 delivery requirements. | |
648 | + | 21 (b) Each request for proposal must also include a | |
649 | + | 22 description of the level of design to be provided in the | |
650 | + | 23 proposals. This description must include the scope and type of | |
651 | + | 24 renderings, drawings, and specifications that, at a minimum, | |
652 | + | 25 will be required by the school district to be produced by the | |
653 | + | ||
654 | + | ||
655 | + | ||
656 | + | ||
657 | + | ||
658 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 19 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
659 | + | ||
660 | + | ||
661 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 20 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 20 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
662 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 20 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
663 | + | 1 design-build entities. | |
664 | + | 2 (c) The scope and performance criteria must be prepared by | |
665 | + | 3 a design professional or public art designer who is an | |
666 | + | 4 employee of the school district, or the school district may | |
667 | + | 5 contract with an independent design professional or public art | |
668 | + | 6 designer selected under the Local Government Professional | |
669 | + | 7 Services Selection Act to provide these services. | |
670 | + | 8 (d) The design professional or public art designer that | |
671 | + | 9 prepares the scope and performance criteria is prohibited from | |
672 | + | 10 participating in any design-build entity proposal for the | |
673 | + | 11 project. | |
674 | + | 12 (e) The design-build contract may be conditioned upon | |
675 | + | 13 subsequent refinements in scope and price and may allow the | |
676 | + | 14 school district to make modifications in the project scope | |
677 | + | 15 without invalidating the design-build contract. | |
678 | + | 16 (105 ILCS 5/15A-25 new) | |
679 | + | 17 Sec. 15A-25. Procedures for selection. | |
680 | + | 18 (a) The school district must use a 2-phase procedure for | |
681 | + | 19 the selection of the successful design-build entity. Phase I | |
682 | + | 20 of the procedure must evaluate and shortlist the design-build | |
683 | + | 21 entities based on qualifications, and Phase II must evaluate | |
684 | + | 22 the technical and cost proposals. | |
685 | + | 23 (b) The school district must include in the request for | |
686 | + | 24 proposal the evaluating factors to be used in Phase I. These | |
687 | + | 25 factors are in addition to any prequalification requirements | |
688 | + | ||
689 | + | ||
690 | + | ||
691 | + | ||
692 | + | ||
693 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 20 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
694 | + | ||
695 | + | ||
696 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 21 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 21 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
697 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 21 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
698 | + | 1 of design-build entities that the school district has set | |
699 | + | 2 forth. Each request for proposal must establish the relative | |
700 | + | 3 importance assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, | |
701 | + | 4 including any weighting of criteria to be employed by the | |
702 | + | 5 school district. The school district must maintain a record of | |
703 | + | 6 the evaluation scoring to be disclosed in event of a protest | |
704 | + | 7 regarding the solicitation. | |
705 | + | 8 The school district must include the following criteria in | |
706 | + | 9 every Phase I evaluation of design-build entities: | |
707 | + | 10 (1) experience of personnel; | |
708 | + | 11 (2) successful experience with similar project types; | |
709 | + | 12 (3) financial capability; | |
710 | + | 13 (4) timeliness of past performance; | |
711 | + | 14 (5) experience with similarly sized projects; | |
712 | + | 15 (6) successful reference checks of the firm; | |
713 | + | 16 (7) commitment to assign personnel for the duration of | |
714 | + | 17 the project and qualifications of the entity's | |
715 | + | 18 consultants; and | |
716 | + | 19 (8) ability or past performance in meeting or | |
717 | + | 20 exhausting good faith efforts to meet the utilization | |
718 | + | 21 goals for business enterprises established in the Business | |
719 | + | 22 Enterprise for Minorities, Women, and Persons with | |
720 | + | 23 Disabilities Act and with Section 2-105 of the Illinois | |
721 | + | 24 Human Rights Act. | |
722 | + | 25 The school district may include any additional, relevant | |
723 | + | 26 criteria in Phase I that it deems necessary for a proper | |
724 | + | ||
725 | + | ||
726 | + | ||
727 | + | ||
728 | + | ||
729 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 21 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
730 | + | ||
731 | + | ||
732 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 22 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 22 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
733 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 22 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
734 | + | 1 qualification review. | |
735 | + | 2 The school district may not consider a design-build entity | |
736 | + | 3 for evaluation or an award if the entity has any pecuniary | |
737 | + | 4 interest in the project or has other relationships or | |
738 | + | 5 circumstances, such as long-term leasehold, mutual | |
739 | + | 6 performance, or development contracts with the school | |
740 | + | 7 district, that may give the design-build entity a financial or | |
741 | + | 8 tangible advantage over other design-build entities in the | |
742 | + | 9 preparation, evaluation, or performance of the design-build | |
743 | + | 10 contract or that create the appearance of impropriety. A | |
744 | + | 11 design-build entity shall not be disqualified under this | |
745 | + | 12 Section solely due to having previously been awarded a project | |
746 | + | 13 or projects under any applicable public procurement law of the | |
747 | + | 14 State. No proposal may be considered that does not include an | |
748 | + | 15 entity's plan to comply with the requirements established in | |
749 | + | 16 the Business Enterprise for Minorities, Women, and Persons | |
750 | + | 17 with Disabilities Act, for both the design and construction | |
751 | + | 18 areas of performance, and with Section 2-105 of the Illinois | |
752 | + | 19 Human Rights Act. | |
753 | + | 20 Upon completion of the qualification evaluation, the | |
754 | + | 21 school district must create a shortlist of the most highly | |
755 | + | 22 qualified design-build entities. The school district, in its | |
756 | + | 23 discretion, is not required to shortlist the maximum number of | |
757 | + | 24 entities as identified for Phase II evaluation if no less than | |
758 | + | 25 2 design-build entities nor more than 6 are selected to submit | |
759 | + | 26 Phase II proposals. If a school district receives one response | |
760 | + | ||
761 | + | ||
762 | + | ||
763 | + | ||
764 | + | ||
765 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 22 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
766 | + | ||
767 | + | ||
768 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 23 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 23 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
769 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 23 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
770 | + | 1 to Phase I, nothing herein shall prohibit the school district | |
771 | + | 2 from proceeding with a Phase II evaluation of the single | |
772 | + | 3 respondent, if the school district, in its discretion, finds | |
773 | + | 4 proceeding to be in its best interest. | |
774 | + | 5 The school district must notify the entities selected for | |
775 | + | 6 the shortlist in writing. This notification must commence the | |
776 | + | 7 period for the preparation of the Phase II technical and cost | |
777 | + | 8 evaluations. The school district must allow sufficient time | |
778 | + | 9 for the shortlist entities to prepare their Phase II | |
779 | + | 10 submittals considering the scope and detail requested by the | |
780 | + | 11 school district. | |
781 | + | 12 (c) The school district must include in the request for | |
782 | + | 13 proposal the evaluating factors to be used in the technical | |
783 | + | 14 and cost submission components of Phase II. Each request for | |
784 | + | 15 proposal must establish, for both the technical and cost | |
785 | + | 16 submission components of Phase II, the relative importance | |
786 | + | 17 assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, including | |
787 | + | 18 any weighting of criteria to be employed by the school | |
788 | + | 19 district. The school district must maintain a record of the | |
789 | + | 20 evaluation scoring to be disclosed in event of a protest | |
790 | + | 21 regarding the solicitation. | |
791 | + | 22 The school district must include the following criteria in | |
792 | + | 23 every Phase II technical evaluation of design-build entities: | |
793 | + | 24 (1) compliance with objectives of the project; | |
794 | + | 25 (2) compliance of proposed services to the request for | |
795 | + | 26 proposal requirements; | |
796 | + | ||
797 | + | ||
798 | + | ||
799 | + | ||
800 | + | ||
801 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 23 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
802 | + | ||
803 | + | ||
804 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 24 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 24 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
805 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 24 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
806 | + | 1 (3) quality of products or materials proposed; | |
807 | + | 2 (4) quality of design parameters; | |
808 | + | 3 (5) design concepts; | |
809 | + | 4 (6) innovation in meeting the scope and performance | |
810 | + | 5 criteria; and | |
811 | + | 6 (7) constructability of the proposed project. | |
812 | + | 7 The school district may include any additional relevant | |
813 | + | 8 technical evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper | |
814 | + | 9 selection. | |
815 | + | 10 The school district must include the following criteria in | |
816 | + | 11 every Phase II cost evaluation: the total project cost, the | |
817 | + | 12 construction costs, and the time of completion. The school | |
818 | + | 13 district may include any additional relevant technical | |
819 | + | 14 evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper selection. | |
820 | + | 15 The total project cost criteria weighting factor may not | |
821 | + | 16 exceed 30%. | |
822 | + | 17 The school district must directly employ or retain a | |
823 | + | 18 licensed design professional or a public art designer to | |
824 | + | 19 evaluate the technical and cost submissions to determine if | |
825 | + | 20 the technical submissions are in accordance with generally | |
826 | + | 21 accepted industry standards. Upon completion of the technical | |
827 | + | 22 submissions and cost submissions evaluation, the school | |
828 | + | 23 district may award the design-build contract to the highest | |
829 | + | 24 overall ranked entity. | |
830 | + | 25 (105 ILCS 5/15A-30 new) | |
831 | + | ||
832 | + | ||
833 | + | ||
834 | + | ||
835 | + | ||
836 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 24 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
837 | + | ||
838 | + | ||
839 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 25 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 25 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
840 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 25 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
841 | + | 1 Sec. 15A-30. Small projects. In any case in which the | |
842 | + | 2 total overall cost of the project is estimated to be | |
843 | + | 3 $12,000,000 or less, the school district may combine the | |
844 | + | 4 2-phase procedure for selection described in Section 15A-25 | |
845 | + | 5 into one combined step if all the requirements of evaluation | |
846 | + | 6 are performed in accordance with Section 15A-25. | |
847 | + | 7 (105 ILCS 5/15A-35 new) | |
848 | + | 8 Sec. 15A-35. Submission of proposals. Proposals must be | |
849 | + | 9 properly identified and sealed. Proposals may not be reviewed | |
850 | + | 10 until after the deadline for submission has passed as set | |
851 | + | 11 forth in the request for proposal. | |
852 | + | 12 Proposals must include a bid bond in the form and security | |
853 | + | 13 as designated in the request for proposal. Proposals must also | |
854 | + | 14 contain a separate sealed envelope with the cost information | |
855 | + | 15 within the overall proposal submission. Proposals must include | |
856 | + | 16 a list of all design professionals, public art designers, and | |
857 | + | 17 other entities to which any work may be subcontracted during | |
858 | + | 18 the performance of the contract. | |
859 | + | 19 Proposals must meet all material requirements of the | |
860 | + | 20 request for proposal, or they may be rejected as | |
861 | + | 21 nonresponsive. The school district may reject any and all | |
862 | + | 22 proposals. | |
863 | + | 23 The drawings and specifications of the proposal may remain | |
864 | + | 24 the property of the design-build entity. | |
865 | + | 25 The school district must review the proposals for | |
866 | + | ||
867 | + | ||
868 | + | ||
869 | + | ||
870 | + | ||
871 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 25 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
872 | + | ||
873 | + | ||
874 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 26 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 26 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
875 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 26 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
876 | + | 1 compliance with the performance criteria and evaluation | |
877 | + | 2 factors. | |
878 | + | 3 Proposals may be withdrawn prior to evaluation for any | |
879 | + | 4 cause. After evaluation begins by the school district, clear | |
880 | + | 5 and convincing evidence of error is required for withdrawal. | |
881 | + | 6 After a response to a request for qualifications or a | |
882 | + | 7 request for proposal has been submitted under this Section, a | |
883 | + | 8 design-build entity may not replace, remove, or otherwise | |
884 | + | 9 modify any firm identified as a member of the proposer's team | |
885 | + | 10 unless authorized to do so by the school district. | |
886 | + | 11 (105 ILCS 5/15A-40 new) | |
887 | + | 12 Sec. 15A-40. Award; performance. The school district may | |
888 | + | 13 award the contract to the highest overall ranked design-build | |
889 | + | 14 entity. Notice of award must be made in writing. Unsuccessful | |
890 | + | 15 design-build entities must also be notified in writing. The | |
891 | + | 16 school district may not request a best and final offer after | |
892 | + | 17 the receipt of proposals of all qualified design-build | |
893 | + | 18 entities. The school district may negotiate with the selected | |
894 | + | 19 design-build entity after the award, but prior to contract | |
895 | + | 20 execution, for the purpose of securing better terms than | |
896 | + | 21 originally proposed if the salient features of the request for | |
897 | + | 22 proposal are not diminished. | |
898 | + | 23 A design-build entity and associated design professionals | |
899 | + | 24 must conduct themselves in accordance with the relevant laws | |
900 | + | 25 of this State and the related provisions of the Illinois | |
901 | + | ||
902 | + | ||
903 | + | ||
904 | + | ||
905 | + | ||
906 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 26 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
907 | + | ||
908 | + | ||
909 | + | SB1570 Enrolled- 27 -LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b SB1570 Enrolled - 27 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
910 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 27 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b | |
911 | + | 1 Administrative Code. | |
912 | + | 2 (105 ILCS 5/15A-45 new) | |
913 | + | 3 Sec. 15A-45. Evaluation and report. At the end of every | |
914 | + | 4 6-month period following the contract award, and again prior | |
915 | + | 5 to final contract payout and closure, a selected design-build | |
916 | + | 6 entity must detail, in a written report submitted to the | |
917 | + | 7 school district, its efforts and success in implementing the | |
918 | + | 8 entity's plan to comply with the utilization goals for | |
919 | + | 9 business enterprises established in the Business Enterprise | |
920 | + | 10 for Minorities, Women, and Persons with Disabilities Act and | |
921 | + | 11 the provisions of Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights | |
922 | + | 12 Act. | |
923 | + | 13 (105 ILCS 5/15A-50 new) | |
924 | + | 14 Sec. 15A-50. Exception. Nothing in this Article prevents a | |
925 | + | 15 school district from using a qualification-based selection | |
926 | + | 16 process for design professionals or construction managers for | |
927 | + | 17 design-build projects. | |
928 | + | 18 (105 ILCS 5/15A-90 new) | |
929 | + | 19 Sec. 15A-90. Severability. The provisions of this Article | |
930 | + | 20 are severable under Section 1.31 of the Statute on Statutes. | |
931 | + | ||
932 | + | ||
933 | + | ||
934 | + | ||
935 | + | ||
936 | + | SB1570 Enrolled - 27 - LRB103 05684 AWJ 50703 b |