Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois Senate Bill SB1673

Introduced
2/8/23  
Refer
2/8/23  
Refer
2/21/23  
Report Pass
3/9/23  
Engrossed
3/24/23  
Refer
3/24/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Report Pass
4/18/23  
Enrolled
5/9/23  
Chaptered
6/30/23  

Caption

MWRD-FLOODPLAIN/STORMWATER

Impact

The bill facilitates the District's ability to collaborate with local agencies and watershed councils. It enables the District to not only plan and implement stormwater management but also to finance these projects. The capacity to enforce civil penalties for non-compliance with stormwater regulations allows the District to hold entities accountable and ensures adherence to the newly set rules. This legislation is poised to significantly reshape the landscape of local governance concerning stormwater management, centralizing authority in the District while still recognizing the roles of local governments.

Summary

SB1673 is a legislative measure that seeks to enhance stormwater management protocols within Cook County, specifically under the authority of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The bill amends the existing Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Act, granting the District broad powers to oversee flood management and implement stormwater initiatives across the county. It emphasizes the creation of a comprehensive countywide plan, which is designed to regulate various aspects of stormwater runoff, ensuring that management efforts align with state and federal standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB1673 is generally supportive within the framework of environmental protection and improved public safety regarding flooding. Proponents argue that the clarified authority of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District will lead to a more organized and efficient approach to managing stormwater issues that have historically plagued the area. However, there may be some concerns regarding potential overreach that could reduce the input and control of local governments over pertinent environmental matters.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention surrounding SB1673 is the extent to which it centralizes power within the District while potentially limiting local governance options. Critics may argue that excessive centralization could hinder the ability of municipalities to address specific local needs effectively. Furthermore, the provisions for civil penalties could be seen as an aggressive enforcement mechanism, raising questions about how stringent regulations will impact local communities and entities engaged in stormwater management.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05476

An Act Concerning The Provision Of Partial Fee Reductions By Municipal Stormwater Authorities And The Inclusion Of Heating, Ventilating And Air Conditioning Systems In School Building Project Grant Payments.

VT H0481

An act relating to stormwater management

CT HB06497

An Act Concerning Stormwater Authorities.

CT HB06441

An Act Concerning Climate Change Adaptation.

FL H0821

Melbourne-Tillman Water Control District, Brevard County

CA SB273

Water quality: municipal wastewater agencies.

CA SB1052

Water quality: municipal wastewater agencies.

CA AB1343

Water conservation: school districts: Go Low Flow Water Conservation Partnerships.