Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

Illinois Senate Bill SB2651

Introduced
1/10/24  
Refer
1/10/24  
Refer
1/24/24  
Refer
4/19/24  
Report Pass
5/8/24  
Engrossed
5/9/24  
Refer
5/13/24  
Refer
5/14/24  
Report Pass
5/23/24  

Caption

COUNTIES-PRESERVE LANDMARKS

Impact

By strengthening the counties' ability to manage landmark preservation, SB2651 impacts state laws related to local governance and regional planning. The bill allows for the designation of landmarks and preservation districts through ordinances and enables counties to secure funding for preservation efforts. Furthermore, it provides a framework for the counties to engage in educational programs surrounding landmark protection, underscoring the importance of cultural heritage within their jurisdictions.

Summary

SB2651 is a bill aimed at enhancing the authority of county boards in Illinois regarding the preservation of landmarks and historic districts. The bill amends various sections of the Counties Code, granting counties the power to establish preservation commissions, conduct ongoing surveys of potential landmarks, and take necessary actions to protect sites of historical, archaeological, architectural, or scenic significance. This legislative effort seeks to ensure that counties have the tools and authority to safeguard their cultural heritage effectively.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB2651 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates for historic preservation. Proponents view the bill as a necessary step to empower local authorities in their preservation efforts, fostering a sense of community pride and identity. Local government officials, preservationists, and cultural heritage advocates support the bill for enhancing local governance and environmental stewardship.

Contention

Despite the overall support, not all opinions are in favor of the bill. Critics express concerns regarding the potential for misuse of the expanded powers by county boards, fearing that local interests might be overshadowed by broader county-level decisions. The discussion highlighted the need for checks and balances to ensure that preservation efforts do not infringe upon property rights or community development goals. The bill's effective implementation will depend on local engagement and how well counties balance preservation efforts with the interests of their constituents.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX SB2639

Relating to the designation of a property as a historic landmark and the inclusion of a property in a historic district or similar preservation district by certain municipalities.

TX SB1585

Relating to requirements for the designation of a property as a historic landmark and the inclusion of a property in a historic district by a municipality.

TX HB1474

Relating to requirements for the designation of a property as a historic landmark and the inclusion of a property in a historic district by a municipality.

LA HB1264

Creates the crime of criminal damage to historic buildings and landmarks by defacing with graffiti (EG INCREASE GF EX See Note)

AL HB508

Baldwin County, constitutional amendment, Belforest Landmark District established

CA SB544

Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act: teleconferencing.

VA HB2709

Historic landmarks; designating or nominating, notice requirements.

LA HB565

Provides relative to renovation of public historic buildings (RE NO IMPACT See Note)