The amendments proposed in SB2780 would have significant implications for local governance in property assessment. The transformation of the supervisor of assessments' role from solely appointed by the county board to a position that may be appointed by county executives introduces a layer of executive influence in what has traditionally been a legislative-controlled function. This could lead to a more centralized approach to property assessments, with potential impacts on how property taxes are levied and consequently how local services are funded.
SB2780, introduced by Senator Rachel Ventura, seeks to amend the Property Tax Code and the Community Mental Health Act in the state of Illinois. This bill modifies the current provisions relating to supervisors of assessments, specifically to include references to county executives in the appointment processes. In counties with fewer than 3 million inhabitants and no elected assessors, a county supervisor of assessments can be appointed by the county executive with the advice and consent of the county board. This change aims to streamline the administrative process by allowing county executives more control over assessment appointments.
Overall, SB2780 represents both a procedural and structural change in local governmental operations concerning property taxation and mental health governance in Illinois. As the bill progresses, it is likely to face scrutiny and debate regarding the balance of power between local government entities and state oversight, particularly in fulfilling community needs for mental health services and equitable property taxation.
Notably, the bill also modifies the Community Mental Health Act by updating the composition and appointment process of community mental health boards, which will now include county executives. Such changes could create discussions around the independence of mental health boards and the influence of local executives in mental health governance. Critics may raise concerns about the implications this has on local autonomy and the potential for partisan influence in what is meant to be a more community-focused board. Home rule units are exempt from these changes but retain the option to adopt them if deemed advisable.