The bill specifically requires that prosecutors notify the defense at least 30 days before a trial or evidentiary hearing if they intend to use statements made under custodial interrogation. They must also provide any electronic recordings or documents related to how those statements were obtained. This provision is expected to foster greater transparency in the prosecutorial process and allow for more robust pre-trial defenses against the introduction of unreliable evidence.
Summary
SB3625, introduced by Senator Celina Villanueva, seeks to amend the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 and the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 by establishing that any statements made during a custodial interrogation by a defendant, which are deemed unreliable, cannot be used as evidence in both criminal and juvenile court proceedings. This legislation aims to enhance the integrity of court proceedings by preventing potentially coerced or unreliable statements from influencing trial outcomes.
Contention
Key considerations outlined in the bill include a set of criteria that courts must use when assessing the reliability of statements made during custodial interrogations. Courts will evaluate whether the statement aligns with known evidence, contains independently verifiable information, or has been influenced by coercive tactics. This aspect of the bill underscores a significant shift towards prioritizing defendants' rights and safeguarding against wrongful convictions stemming from dubious interrogation practices.
In preliminary provisions, adopting the Uniform Electronic Recordation of Custodial Interrogations Act; requiring recordings of interrogations; and imposing functions on the Attorney General.
In preliminary provisions, adopting the Uniform Electronic Recordation of Custodial Interrogations Act; requiring recordings of interrogations; and imposing functions on the Attorney General.