Indiana 2023 Regular Session

Indiana House Bill HB1142

Introduced
1/10/23  
Refer
1/10/23  
Report Pass
1/31/23  
Engrossed
2/7/23  
Refer
2/27/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Enrolled
3/29/23  
Passed
4/20/23  
Chaptered
4/20/23  

Caption

Law enforcement recordings.

Impact

The bill's provisions expand public access to law enforcement recordings, aligning state laws with a growing demand for transparency in governmental operations. By enhancing public access, the bill seeks to improve accountability within law enforcement agencies. The amendments made by HB1142 impose protocols that law enforcement agencies must follow, specifically regarding obscuring sensitive details before releasing recordings. This creates a more structured framework for how such materials are handled, potentially impacting ongoing investigations and legal processes.

Summary

House Bill 1142 (HB1142) aims to amend the Indiana Code regarding the access and handling of law enforcement recordings. This bill permits individuals to inspect and copy recordings made during law enforcement activities, but with specific limitations to protect sensitive information. It establishes guidelines for what recordings can be made public and outlines the process for individuals to request access, reinforcing the right of citizens to engage with public records while balancing concerns for privacy and ongoing investigations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB1142 appears to be supportive, particularly among advocates for transparency and civil rights. However, there are concerns among some law enforcement officials and legal experts regarding the potential repercussions on investigations and privacy protections. The discussion reflects a balancing act between ensuring public access to government activities and safeguarding the integrity of law enforcement operations.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the appropriate balance between transparency and the operational needs of law enforcement. While supporters of HB1142 argue that public access to recordings will promote accountability, critics voice concerns that the bill could undermine ongoing investigations and the privacy rights of individuals captured in these recordings. The discussions surrounding HB1142 illustrate a significant debate regarding the role of public access in law enforcement practices and the broader implications for civil liberties.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1758

Court records: fees.

CA SB609

Fish: commercial fishing.

CA AB2962

Court records: fees.

CA AB2546

Commercial email advertisements.

CA SB1179

Electronic transactions: insurance.

CA SB361

Surplus land: City of Anaheim.

CA AB1697

Uniform Electronic Transactions Act.

MI HB4250

Traffic control: violations; penalties for operating a vehicle while sending or receiving a message on an electronic wireless device; enhance. Amends sec. 602b of 1949 PA 300 (MCL 257.602b). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4251'23, HB 4252'23