1 | 1 | | Introduced Version |
---|
2 | 2 | | SENATE CONCURRENT |
---|
3 | 3 | | RESOLUTION No. _____ |
---|
4 | 4 | | DIGEST OF INTRODUCED RESOLUTION |
---|
5 | 5 | | A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION congratulating the Indiana |
---|
6 | 6 | | Department of Transportation, HNTB Corporation, Walsh |
---|
7 | 7 | | Construction, and their many partners on having a portion of Interstate |
---|
8 | 8 | | 69 Finish Line, located in Martinsville and Morgan County, Indiana, |
---|
9 | 9 | | recognized as the top roadway project in the United States for 2022. |
---|
10 | 10 | | BRAY |
---|
11 | 11 | | , read first time and referred to Committee on |
---|
12 | 12 | | 2023 RC 1524/DI SM Introduced |
---|
13 | 13 | | First Regular Session 123rd General Assembly (2023) |
---|
14 | 14 | | SENATE CONCURRENT |
---|
15 | 15 | | RESOLUTION No. _____ |
---|
16 | 16 | | 1 A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION congratulating the |
---|
17 | 17 | | 2 Indiana Department of Transportation, HNTB Corporation, |
---|
18 | 18 | | 3 Walsh Construction, and their many partners on having a |
---|
19 | 19 | | 4 portion of Interstate 69 Finish Line, located in Martinsville and |
---|
20 | 20 | | 5 Morgan County, Indiana, recognized as the top roadway project |
---|
21 | 21 | | 6 in the United States for 2022. |
---|
22 | 22 | | 7 Whereas, The Interstate 69 (I-69) Finish Line is a |
---|
23 | 23 | | 8 realization of 75 years of community studies and discussions to |
---|
24 | 24 | | 9 connect Evansville to Indianapolis through 142 miles of an |
---|
25 | 25 | | 10 improved, multi-lane highway system; |
---|
26 | 26 | | 11 Whereas, The final 26 mile section of interstate, spanning |
---|
27 | 27 | | 12 from Martinsville to Indianapolis, was split into five |
---|
28 | 28 | | 13 construction contracts to create 35 lane miles of local access |
---|
29 | 29 | | 14 roads and 39 new bridges, rehabilitate 35 existing bridges, and |
---|
30 | 30 | | 15 remove 14 traffic signals in order to reduce regional annual |
---|
31 | 31 | | 16 crash numbers by 1,300 and generate $4.1 billion in economic |
---|
32 | 32 | | 17 impact over the next twenty years; |
---|
33 | 33 | | 18 Whereas, The I-69 Finish Line's Contract 2 was awarded |
---|
34 | 34 | | 19 to Walsh Construction and focused on six miles of State Road |
---|
35 | 35 | | 20 37 through Martinsville that serves as a crucial road in the city |
---|
36 | 36 | | 21 and includes heavily-used access points to multiple businesses, |
---|
37 | 37 | | 22 and was the only I-69 contract that had to remove an existing |
---|
38 | 38 | | 23 highway passing through a city to replace it with an interstate; |
---|
39 | 39 | | 24 Whereas, State, county, and municipal stakeholders |
---|
40 | 40 | | 25 coordinated to fully close the corridor during construction, |
---|
41 | 41 | | 26 which ensured the safety of workers and motorists, accelerated |
---|
42 | 42 | | 2023 RC 1524/DI SM 2 |
---|
43 | 43 | | 1 road completion of Contract 2 by a full year, and assisted |
---|
44 | 44 | | 2 Contract 4, which was awarded to Reith-Riley Construction |
---|
45 | 45 | | 3 and encompassed the area from Martinsville to State Road 144, |
---|
46 | 46 | | 4 to be accelerated due to lower traffic volumes; |
---|
47 | 47 | | 5 Whereas, The planning and construction phases of |
---|
48 | 48 | | 6 Contract 2 experienced multiple challenges, including the need |
---|
49 | 49 | | 7 to reevaluate stormwater drainage patterns and management |
---|
50 | 50 | | 8 to support the abundance and quality of groundwater, moving |
---|
51 | 51 | | 9 and locating various utility lines from at least sixteen different |
---|
52 | 52 | | 10 utility companies, keeping open communication with businesses |
---|
53 | 53 | | 11 and Indiana University to limit impacts, and engaging with a |
---|
54 | 54 | | 12 new local administration regarding the project's background |
---|
55 | 55 | | 13 and upcoming activities; |
---|
56 | 56 | | 14 Whereas, The project team gave particular attention to |
---|
57 | 57 | | 15 creating community cohesiveness by constructing gateway |
---|
58 | 58 | | 16 monuments reminiscent of the Morgan County Courthouse |
---|
59 | 59 | | 17 Clock Tower inside the interchanges of State Roads 39 and 44, |
---|
60 | 60 | | 18 and replicated the brick samples of the Morgan County |
---|
61 | 61 | | 19 Courthouse into nearly 1.4 miles of noise barriers; |
---|
62 | 62 | | 20 Whereas, Collaborative planning by hundreds of engineers, |
---|
63 | 63 | | 21 planners, and the local community resulted in a final product |
---|
64 | 64 | | 22 that not only serves the transportation needs of Hoosiers, but |
---|
65 | 65 | | 23 also aesthetically reflects the historic character of Martinsville |
---|
66 | 66 | | 24 and Morgan County; and |
---|
67 | 67 | | 25 Whereas, Portions of the I-69 Finish Line were completed |
---|
68 | 68 | | 26 and opened to traffic by December 21, 2021, exhibiting a high |
---|
69 | 69 | | 27 quality of design, construction, and traffic maintenance that |
---|
70 | 70 | | 28 resulted in Roads and Bridges magazine recognizing it as the |
---|
71 | 71 | | 29 top roadway project in the United States during its 2022 annual |
---|
72 | 72 | | 30 review of major construction projects and enhancing Indiana's |
---|
73 | 73 | | 31 reputation as the "Crossroads of America": Therefore, |
---|
74 | 74 | | 32 Be it resolved by the Senate of the General Assembly |
---|
75 | 75 | | 33 of the State of Indiana, the House of Representatives |
---|
76 | 76 | | 34 concurring: |
---|
77 | 77 | | 35 SECTION 1. That the Indiana General Assembly |
---|
78 | 78 | | 2023 RC 1524/DI SM 3 |
---|
79 | 79 | | 1 congratulates the Indiana Department of Transportation, HNTB |
---|
80 | 80 | | 2 Corporation, Walsh Construction, and their many partners on |
---|
81 | 81 | | 3 having a portion of Interstate 69 Finish Line, located in |
---|
82 | 82 | | 4 Martinsville and Morgan County, Indiana, recognized as the top |
---|
83 | 83 | | 5 roadway project in the United States for 2022. |
---|
84 | 84 | | 6 SECTION 2. The Secretary of the Senate is hereby directed |
---|
85 | 85 | | 7 to transmit copies of this Resolution to Michael Smith, |
---|
86 | 86 | | 8 Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Transportation |
---|
87 | 87 | | 9 (INDOT), the INDOT Central Office, INDOT Major Projects |
---|
88 | 88 | | 10 Division, INDOT Seymour District office, Butler, Fairman, & |
---|
89 | 89 | | 11 Seufert Inc., CDM Smith, Corradino LLC, Crawford, Murphy, |
---|
90 | 90 | | 12 & Tilly Inc., HNTB Corporation, Lochmueller Group, Rieth- |
---|
91 | 91 | | 13 Riley Construction, Walsh Construction, and WSP. |
---|
92 | 92 | | 2023 RC 1524/DI SM |
---|