Indiana 2024 Regular Session

Indiana House Bill HB1133

Introduced
1/8/24  
Refer
1/8/24  
Report Pass
1/18/24  
Engrossed
1/26/24  
Refer
2/5/24  
Report Pass
2/20/24  
Enrolled
2/28/24  
Passed
3/12/24  
Chaptered
3/12/24  

Caption

Use of digitally altered media in elections.

Impact

The passage of HB1133 impacts the legal framework surrounding elections by mandating that any campaign communication that includes fabricated media must carry clear disclaimers. These disclaimers must inform viewers that elements of the media have been digitally altered or artificially generated. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in civil action from affected candidates, providing them with an avenue for recourse against misleading campaign practices. This could significantly elevate the standards for campaign communications and contribute to a more informed electorate.

Summary

House Bill 1133 establishes regulations concerning the use of digitally altered media in election campaigns within Indiana. This bill aims to address the increasingly prevalent issue of misinformation and deceptive practices facilitated by the manipulation of digital media. By defining terms such as 'fabricated media' and 'campaign communication,' the bill lays the groundwork for legal accountability regarding the dissemination of altered media that could mislead voters about candidates. The legislation seeks to protect the integrity of the electoral process and ensure transparency in how candidates are portrayed in various media formats.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB1133 appears to be largely positive with overwhelming support evident from its voting history, which shows a unanimous agreement in the House with 95 votes in favor and no opposition. Proponents of the bill view it as a proactive measure to combat the spread of misleading information in the political arena, thereby safeguarding the electoral process. However, there may be concerns about the enforcement of these regulations and rights surrounding creative expression in campaign media.

Contention

Despite its favorable reception among lawmakers, some potential points of contention may arise regarding the implementation of disclaimers and the definition of fabricated media. Critics may question the effectiveness of the bill in truly curbing misinformation, especially when it comes to determining what constitutes 'fabricated' media and the burden placed on campaign communications to include disclaimers. Additionally, there could be discussions about balancing the need for transparency with the rights of individuals involved in political advertising, raising questions about free speech and censorship.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NM HB182

Election Changes

MS HB1267

Political communication; require to contain disclaimer if generated by artificial intelligence algorithms.

OK HB1448

Elections; campaign or election material; disclaimer; misdemeanor; effective date.

MN SF2226

Political advertisements record-keeping and reporting requirements establishment; Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board public access to reports, including copies of political advertisements authorization

MN HF1689

Record-keeping and reporting requirements related to political advertisements provided; Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board required to provide public access to reports, including copies of campaign advertisements; and requirements related to disclaimer display on campaign material amended.

TN SB2057

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 2, Chapter 19, Part 1, relative to political campaigns.

TN HB2185

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 2, Chapter 19, Part 1, relative to political campaigns.

MN SF1996

Campaign finance provisions modifications