Indiana House Bill HB1478

Indiana 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/25
• Refer: 1/21/25
• Report Pass: 2/3/25
• Engrossed: 2/11/25
• Refer: 2/20/25
• Refer: 3/13/25
• Report Pass: 4/1/25
• Enrolled: 4/8/25
• Passed: 4/22/25

Caption

Pro bono legal services fee.

Impact

The implementation of this fee is expected to contribute to the pro bono legal services fund, which aims to support legal aid organizations that assist low-income residents. By establishing a structured financial framework to facilitate pro bono work, the bill could ultimately lead to a more equitable legal system in Indiana. However, the bill may also face challenges, particularly regarding its effectiveness in sufficiently addressing the legal needs of underserved populations.

Summary

House Bill 1478 focuses on establishing a pro bono legal services fee within various civil proceedings in Indiana. Effective July 1, 2025, the bill mandates the collection of a pro bono legal services fee of one dollar from parties involved in specific civil actions, small claims actions, or probate actions. The intent behind this fee is to provide funding for legal assistance to those who cannot afford legal representation, thereby enhancing access to justice for low-income individuals.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1478 appears to be largely positive among advocates for legal reform and access to justice. Supporters argue that the bill represents a significant step toward alleviating barriers to legal representation for low-income individuals. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential burden on individuals who may already be financially strained by legal issues, particularly given the additional fees imposed by various court proceedings.

Contention

There are points of contention related to how effectively the funds collected from this fee will be utilized. Critics may question the administrative implications of implementing the fee across different courts and how well it aligns with existing financial mechanisms supporting legal aid. Furthermore, there is a broader debate regarding the balance between funding for legal services and the overall cost burden on litigants, which could influence the bill's support in legislative discussions.