The proposed bill significantly alters existing requirements regarding the necessity of restrictive covenants or environmental restrictive ordinances during remediation efforts. Specifically, it establishes that such restrictions are not needed if the expected future use of the site does not likely involve exposure to residual contamination that would exceed the established remediation objectives. This modification has implications for both the pace and nature of the remediation processes as it could potentially streamline efforts to clean contaminated sites.
Summary
Senate Bill 349 is an act aimed at amending the Indiana Code to provide clearer guidelines for the voluntary remediation of hazardous substances and petroleum. The bill addresses how remediation objectives should be defined in relation to hazardous materials on a site. It stipulates that the objectives must consider both natural background levels of such substances and an assessment of risks associated with them, particularly in light of future site use and measurable risks to human health and the environment.
Contention
One notable point of contention surrounding SB 349 is the balance between environmental protection and development. Proponents of the bill argue that reducing the burden of restrictive covenants encourages faster remediation, ultimately promoting economic growth and infrastructure development. Conversely, critics may raise concerns that less stringent oversight could lead to hazardous conditions if future land use is not properly accountable for potential exposure to contaminants and public health risks.
Pesticides approved for registration and labeling by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under FIFRA; exempt manufacture and sale from liability actions.