Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas House Bill HB2020

Introduced
1/11/23  
Refer
1/11/23  
Report Pass
2/7/23  
Engrossed
3/1/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
3/14/23  
Enrolled
4/24/23  

Caption

Providing that the employment status of a driver of a motor carrier does not change as a result of the inclusion of safety improvements on a vehicle and establishing conditions for when a driver is an independent contractor for a transportation network company.

Impact

The passage of HB2020 is expected to have a considerable impact on Kansas laws relating to transportation and employment classifications. By clearly delineating the conditions under which TNC drivers are classified as independent contractors, the bill reinforces a model that many automobile drivers under platforms like Uber and Lyft currently operate. This legislative change may influence other areas such as labor rights and benefits, as it establishes a precedent that could limit future claims of employee classification for TNC drivers.

Summary

House Bill 2020 addresses significant regulations surrounding the employment status of drivers in the transportation sector, particularly focusing on motor carriers and transportation network companies (TNCs). The bill asserts that a driver's employment status will not be altered as a consequence of implementing motor carrier safety improvements. This establishes a clear framework within which safety upgrades can be made without affecting how drivers are classified under state employment laws, aiming to enhance safety without compromising driver employment rights.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2020 appears to be mixed, with supporters advocating for the protection of driver independence and flexibility while expressing concerns for road safety. Proponents argue that the bill will create a more enjoyable work environment for drivers by ensuring their ability to operate independently, while critics warn that it may strip workers of critical rights and protections under employment law, potentially leading to exploitative conditions.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between necessary safety improvements for vehicles and the implications they might have for driver autonomy. Some legislators raised concerns that requiring safety improvements could inadvertently lead to drivers being reclassified as employees, which could affect their operational flexibility. Thus, discussions centered around finding a harmonious approach that recognizes the vital importance of safety without compromising the independent contractor status that many drivers rely on for income.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2237

Transportation planning: regional transportation improvement plan: sustainable communities strategies: alternative planning strategy: state transportation funding.

CA SB1369

Energy: green electrolytic hydrogen.

CA SB1196

State Transit Assistance Program: eligibility: Anaheim Transportation Network.

HI HB699

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

HI SB770

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

UT SB0310

Transportation Utility Fee Amendments

CA AB1525

Transportation projects: priority populations.

TX SB2096

Relating to the creation of and the powers of a comprehensive multimodal urban transportation authority, including the power to impose taxes, issue bonds, and exercise limited eminent domain authority.