Kansas House Bill HB2197

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/26/23
• Refer: 1/26/23
• Report Pass: 2/16/23
• Engrossed: 2/23/23
• Refer: 3/2/23
• Report Pass: 3/16/23
• Enrolled: 3/28/23
• Passed: 4/3/23

Caption

Providing a procedure for the distribution of a first-time home buyer savings account balance upon the death of an account holder, changing the term "transfer on death" to "payable on death" and resolving a conflict when beneficiaries differ on a financial institution's account records and tax forms required by the secretary of revenue.

Impact

The bill is set to revise Kansas laws related to first-time home buyer savings accounts, establishing specific maximum contribution limits and durations for moneys held in these accounts. For instance, it allows a maximum contribution of $3,000 per tax year for individuals and $6,000 for married couples, with total account limits capping at $50,000. Additionally, the bill ensures that any interest earned exceeds these limits will be subject to income tax, modifying the financial landscape for individuals saving for home purchases, potentially affecting their saving strategies.

Summary

House Bill 2197 addresses the management of first-time home buyer savings accounts in Kansas. It introduces new procedures for how these accounts interact with beneficiaries, specifically defining the term 'payable on death' instead of 'transfer on death' for handling account balances upon the death of the account holder. It clarifies the operational responsibilities of financial institutions regarding these accounts in terms of tracking and reporting, particularly identifying conflicts when beneficiaries differ on institution records versus tax documents. This aims to provide greater clarity and reliability in the management of such accounts.

Contention

Discussions surrounding HB 2197 could involve concerns about the implications of these changes, particularly regarding estate planning and taxes. There may be opposition from stakeholders who feel the new guidelines could complicate the process for account holders and beneficiaries, especially in cases involving deceased account holders or disputes over account management. The emphasis on financial institutions not being liable for tracking and reporting might create an environment where account holders face complications, raising questions about consumer protection and transparency.