Kansas 2023 2023-2024 Regular Session

Kansas Senate Bill SB232 Comm Sub / Analysis

                    SESSION OF 2023
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE 
BILL NO. 232
As Recommended by Senate Committee on 
Judiciary
Brief*
Sub. For SB 232 would enact the Child Advocate Act 
(Act) on and after July 1, 2023, which would establish the 
Office of the Child Advocate (OCA) as an independent state 
agency. The bill would also amend law in the Revised Kansas 
Code for Care of Children (CINC Code) and the Revised 
Kansas Juvenile Justice Code (Juvenile Code) concerning 
various related provisions. [Note: The amendments to current 
law would be effective upon publication in the Kansas 
Register unless a different effective date is specified.]
Child Advocate Act (Sections 1–6)
The bill would state the Act’s provisions would be 
effective on and after July 1, 2023. 
Definitions
The Act would define the following terms: 
●“Office” would mean the OCA and would include 
the Child Advocate and staff;
●“Child” would mean an individual less than 18 
years of age at the time such individual:
____________________
*Supplemental notes are prepared by the Legislative Research 
Department and do not express legislative intent. The supplemental 
note and fiscal note for this bill may be accessed on the Internet at 
http://www.kslegislature.org ○Is in the custody of the Secretary for Children 
and Families (Secretary);
○Was previously in the custody of the 
Secretary; 
○Is alleged to be a child in need of care; or 
○Is or was receiving services from the Kansas 
Department for Children and Families (DCF) 
or any contracting agency, for whom DCF has 
an open case file, or who has been, or whose 
siblings, parents, or other caretakers have 
been the subject of a report of abuse or 
neglect to DCF within the previous five years.
Establishment of Office of the Child Advocate; Selection and 
Appointment of Child Advocate
The Child Advocate would be established as the 
independent head of the OCA, and the bill would specify 
nothing in the Act would be construed to permit any 
governmental agency to exercise control or supervision over 
the Child Advocate or the OCA. The Child Advocate would be 
appointed by the Governor and subject to confirmation by the 
Senate. 
The bill would require the Child Advocate be selected 
without regard to political affiliation and on the basis of 
integrity and capacity for effectively carrying out the duties of 
the OCA. The bill would prohibit any former or current 
executive or manager of any program or agency or 
contracting agency subject to oversight by the OCA from 
being appointed as Child Advocate within 12 months of such 
individual’s period of service within such program or agency. 
The Child Advocate would serve a term of five years or until a 
successor has been appointed and confirmed. The Child 
Advocate would be in the unclassified service and receive an 
annual salary equal to that of a district court judge. The bill 
would require the Child Advocate exercise independent 
judgment in carrying out the duties of the office. 
2- 232 The bill would specify the Child Advocate would have 
general managerial control over the OCA and would be 
required to establish the organizational structure of the OCA 
as appropriate to carry out the responsibilities and functions 
of the OCA.
The bill would provide that all budgeting, purchasing, 
personnel, and related administrative functions of the office 
would be administered under the direction and supervision of 
the Child Advocate. 
Within the limits of appropriations, the Child Advocate 
could hire unclassified employees necessary to administer 
the OCA, who would serve at the pleasure of the Child 
Advocate. The Child Advocate could obtain the services of 
other professionals necessary to independently perform the 
functions of the OCA, including obtaining legal services from 
the Attorney General as provided elsewhere in statute. The 
Child Advocate could enter into agreements with the 
Secretary of Administration for the provision of personnel, 
facility management, and information technology services. 
Purpose of the Child Advocate
The bill would identify the purpose of the Child Advocate 
is to ensure that children and families receive adequate 
coordination of child welfare services, for child maltreatment 
prevention, protection, and care through services offered by: 
●DCF or its contracting agencies; 
● The Department for Aging and Disability Services 
(KDADS);
●The Department of Corrections (KDOC);
●The Department of Health and Environment 
(KDHE); and 
●Juvenile courts. 
3- 232 Duties and Powers of the OCA and the Child Advocate 
The bill would require the OCA to:
●Receive and resolve complaints that allege that 
DCF or DCF’s contracting agencies by act or 
omission have:
○Provided inadequate protection or care of 
children; 
○Failed to protect the physical or mental health, 
safety, or welfare of any child; or 
○Failed to follow established laws, rules, and 
regulations or written policies. 
The bill would require the Child Advocate to: 
●Establish and implement procedures for receiving, 
processing, responding to, and resolving 
complaints made by or on behalf of children, that 
adversely or may adversely affect the health, 
safety, and welfare of such children that relate to:
○State agencies; 
○Service providers, including contractors and 
subcontractors; and
○Any juvenile court.
●Provide DCF with a notice of availability that 
describes the OCA and how to contact the OCA, 
which DCF would be required to prominently 
display in DCF offices and facilities receiving public 
moneys for the care and placement of children; 
●Maintain a public website; 
●Publicize and notify individuals of the OCA’s 
services, purpose, and contact information; 
4- 232 ●Compile, collect, and preserve a record of 
complaints received and processed, which may 
reveal concerning patterns to be addressed; and
●Recommend changes to policies, procedures, or 
adopted or proposed rules and regulations of any 
state or local agency that adversely affect or may 
adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of 
any child. 
OCA Investigations 
The OCA would be required to independently investigate 
complaints received if the OCA reasonably believes the 
complaint’s allegations may be independently verified through 
an investigation. In conducting such investigations, the OCA 
would be required to: 
●Establish and implement procedures for 
investigating complaints;
●Have access to the following information: 
○Names and physical locations of all children in 
protective services, treatment, or other 
program under the jurisdiction of DCF or 
KDOC; 
○All written reports of child abuse and neglect;
○All records of any public or private agency or 
institution having custody of the child under 
court order, providing education, medical or 
mental health services to the child or any 
placement or potential placement provider 
determined by the Secretary; and 
○All current records required to be maintained 
as provided in the CINC Code and the 
Juvenile Code;
●Communicate privately with: 
5- 232 ○Any child or child’s siblings, after consultation 
with treatment professionals and service 
providers; and
○Anyone working the child, including the family, 
relatives, employees of DCF, employees of 
KDOC, and other persons or entities providing 
treatment and services;
●Have access to, including the right to inspect and 
copy, relevant child records held by:
Law enforcement agencies;
○The clerk of any Kansas court; 
○Juvenile officers; 
○Public or private institutions; and
○Other agencies with whom a particular child 
has been voluntarily or otherwise placed for 
care or has received treatment within Kansas 
or in another state;
●Work in conjunction with:
○Juvenile intake and assessment workers;
○Juvenile community corrections officers; 
○Guardians ad litem; and 
○Court-appointed special advocates; and
●Subpoena materials or witnesses, take statements 
under oath, serve interrogatories, and obtain 
judicial enforcement of compulsory processes. 
Complaint Resolution by the OCA 
The bill would require the OCA to resolve complaints by: 
●Establishing and implementing procedures to 
resolve the complaints; 
6- 232 ●Independently reviewing the complaint and 
accompanying documents; 
●Recommending the appropriate agency or 
department do one of the following: 
○Review the matter further;
○Modify or cancel the actions;
○Change a rule, order, or internal policy; 
○Explain the action further; or
○Within a reasonable amount of time, provide 
the OCA information as to the implementation 
or not of the recommendation by the 
appropriate agency or department;
●Submitting any findings and recommendations to 
DCF or KDOC as appropriate; 
●Making referrals of child abuse or neglect to law 
enforcement agencies if there is reason to believe 
a criminal investigation is warranted and notifying 
the Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Unit of the 
Office of the Attorney General; and
●Producing reports of findings of fact or conclusions 
of law regarding any complaint, and if appropriate, 
the Attorney General could file such reports in any 
pending CINC case on behalf of the OCA. 
Child Welfare System Oversight Assistance
The bill would outline the actions the OCA may take to 
assist the Legislature in oversight of the child welfare system. 
The OCA could: 
●Meet and discuss any matter in the scope of the 
Act with the Joint Committee on Child Welfare 
System Oversight in regular or executive session 
under applicable duties of confidentiality;
7- 232 ●Review relevant statutes, rules and regulations, 
policies and procedures for the health, safety and 
welfare of children;
●Evaluate the effectiveness of and recommend 
changes to procedures for reports of child abuse 
and neglect for child protective services, including, 
but not limited to, the involvement of DCF, service 
providers, guardians ad litem, court appointed 
special advocates, and law enforcement agencies; 
and
●Review and recommend changes to law 
enforcement investigative procedures for and 
emergency responses to reports of abuse and 
neglect.
Annual Report
The bill would require the Child Advocate, on or before 
the beginning of each regular Legislative Session, to submit 
an annual report to the Governor, the Chief Justice of the 
Supreme Court and the Office of Judicial Administration, the 
Secretary for Children and Families, the President of the 
Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the 
Joint Committee on Child Welfare Oversight, the House 
Committee on Child Welfare and Foster Care (or successor 
committee), the Senate Committee on Public Health and 
Welfare (or successor committee), and any other relevant 
legislative committee. 
The reports would be required to include the following 
items: 
●The number of complaints received by the OCA; 
●The disposition of the complaints; 
●The number of children involved in such 
complaints; 
8- 232 ●The outcome of such complaints; 
●Recommendations for changes in statute, policies, 
procedures, or rules and regulations; 
●The OCA’s proposed annual budget; and 
●Any other topics the OCA deems appropriate to 
properly perform the powers, duties, and functions 
provided by the Act.
Cooperation by State Agencies With the OCA
The bill would require DCF and its contracting agencies, 
KDOC, juvenile intake and assessment workers, juvenile 
community corrections officers, guardians ad litem, and court 
appointed special advocates to cooperate with the OCA and:
●Work diligently, promptly, and in good faith to assist 
the OCA in performing its powers, duties and 
functions provided by the Act;
●Provide full access to and production of records 
and information requested by the OCA. Such 
access would not be a violation of confidentiality if 
provided and produced in good faith for the 
purposes of the Act;
●Require employees and contractors of such 
department or agency to comply with requests from 
the OCA; 
●Allow employees of such department or agency to 
file a complaint with or provide records or 
information to the OCA without supervisory 
approval;
●Not willfully interfere with or obstruct any of the 
OCA’s duties; and
9- 232 ●Promptly meet and consult with the OCA upon 
request.
Confidentiality 
The bill would state the OCA would be subject to the 
same state and federal statutory disclosure restrictions and 
confidentiality requirements applicable to the state agency or 
other entity providing information to the OCA, with regard to 
the information received from the agency or other entity.
Any files maintained by the OCA would be confidential 
and disclosed only at the discretion of the Child Advocate, 
except that the identity of any complainant or child would not 
be disclosed by the OCA unless the complainant or child, or 
either’s legal representative, consents in writing to such 
disclosure; or such disclosure is required by court order.
The bill would provide that any statement or 
communication made by the OCA relevant to a complaint 
being investigated by the OCA and any complaint or 
information made or provided in good faith by any person 
would be absolutely privileged, and such person would be 
immune from suit.
The bill would prohibit a representative of the OCA 
conducting or participating in any investigation of a complaint 
from knowingly disclosing to any person other than the OCA, 
or a person authorized by the OCA, the name of any witness 
examined or any information obtained or given during such 
investigation. Such disclosure would be a class A nonperson 
misdemeanor.
The bill would require the OCA, after conducting or 
participating in any investigation of a complaint, to disclose 
the final result of the investigation with the consent of the 
child or the child’s legal representative.
10- 232 The OCA could not be required to testify in any court 
with respect to matters held to be confidential in this section, 
except as the court may deem necessary to enforce the 
provisions of the Act, or when otherwise required by court 
order.
The bill would state the provisions providing for 
confidentiality of records would expire on July 1, 2028, unless 
the Legislature reviews and reenacts the provisions, pursuant 
to the Kansas Open Records Act (KORA), prior to July 1, 
2028.
Retaliation; Prohibited Actions 
Any person who knowingly takes “retaliatory action,” as 
defined in the bill, against a child, DCF employee, an 
employee of contracting agencies of DCF, or KDOC 
employee for any communication made or information given 
to the OCA would be guilty of a class A nonperson 
misdemeanor, except when an employee discloses: 
●Information the employee knows to be false or 
information without regard for the truth or falsity of 
the information; or
●Without lawful authority, information that is 
confidential as provided by any other provision of 
law.
Employees of the OCA would be prohibited from 
knowingly disclosing false information or disclosing 
confidential information without legal authority. 
11- 232 Amendments to CINC Code (Sections 7–14)
Jurisdiction of ICWA (Section 7)
The bill would amend law governing jurisdiction of 
proceedings under the CINC Code to specify if orders 
granting custody for adoption involve a child who is Indian, 
the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) would apply 
instead of the CINC Code. 
Access to Information (Section 8–10) 
The bill would amend statutes to add the OCA to the list 
of entities with access to official files, social files, information 
from agency records, information in law enforcement records, 
records of law enforcement officers and agencies, records of 
municipal courts, and records, reports, and information 
obtained as part of the juvenile intake and assessment 
process for juveniles. [Note: Such access would be subject to 
continuing limits based on relevancy and other factors 
contained in these statutes.]
The bill also would make technical amendments to these 
statues to ensure consistency in statutory phrasing and 
update a reference to the Commissioner of Juvenile Justice 
to reflect agency reorganization.
Custody Orders For Adoption Proceedings (Section 11)
The bill would amend law governing orders granting 
custody for adoption when parental rights have been 
terminated, as follows. The bill would specify the provisions in 
this section would be required to be construed and applied 
retroactively to all proceedings pending before a court on the 
effective date of the bill.
Orders granting custody to proposed adoptive 
parents. In an order granting custody to proposed adoptive 
12- 232 parents, the bill would require the court be guided by the best 
interests of the child. The bill would also specify in this type of 
order, any prior custody order would cease upon the granting 
of custody of the child to the proposed adoptive parents. 
Orders granting custody to Secretary or 
corporation. In an order granting custody to the Secretary or 
to a corporation organized to care for and surrender children 
for adoption as specified by CINC Code, the bill would specify 
that the Secretary or corporation must be guided by the best 
interests of the child when making adoption decisions. 
Adoption selection preference. The bill would further 
specify when a child is placed in the custody of the Secretary 
for the purposes of adoption when parental rights have been 
terminated or relinquished, the Secretary would be required 
to give preference, subject to the best interests of the child, in 
the following manner: 
●If a child has been in the custody of the Secretary 
for less than one cumulative year: 
○First to a relative; 
○Second to a person with whom the child has 
close and healthy attachments;
●If a child has been in the custody of the Secretary 
for one cumulative year or more: 
○To a placement that maintains the child’s 
close and healthy attachments. 
The bill would allow a foster parent who is not selected 
by the Secretary for the adoptive placement but who meets 
the criteria above, to request direct placement of the child by 
the court and appeal such decision to the Kansas Court of 
Appeals. 
The bill would require the Secretary consider a foster 
parent as a prospective adoptive parent when: 
13- 232 ●The child has lived more than half of the child’s 
lifetime with the foster parent; 
●The child has lived more than two years with the 
foster parent; or 
●The Secretary otherwise determines it is in the best 
interests of the child. 
Adoption selection policies, training, and data 
collection. To implement the provisions of the bill, the 
Secretary would be required to:
●Develop and enforce adoption selection policies 
that comply with the bill and ensure caregiver and 
sibling attachments are appropriately considered; 
●Review and update policies to reduce time to 
adoption permanency; 
●Apply adoption selection policies consistently; 
●Develop and provide training for contractors and 
employees; 
●Collect data regarding best interest staffing 
conducted pursuant to the statute, including, but 
not limited to, data on the number of: 
○Prospective adoptive parents who request the 
Secretary to reconsider an initial adoptive 
placement decision; 
○Initial adoptive placement decisions that the 
Secretary overturns after reconsidering the 
initial adoptive placement decision; and 
○Prospective adoptive parents who request the 
court to review the Secretary’s adoptive 
placement decision. 
Annual report to the Legislature. The bill would 
require the Secretary to prepare a report on compliance with 
14- 232 the provisions above, to be submitted to the Legislature on or 
before the first day of the 2024 Legislative Session and each 
session thereafter.
Appeals (Section 12)
The bill would amend law governing orders that may be 
appealed under the CINC Code to add any order of a 
placement of a child, including but not limited to, an order 
entered after termination of parental rights. The bill would 
state the amendments made to this section are procedural in 
nature and would be required to be applied retroactively to 
any order issued on or after February 1, 2022.
Amendments to Juvenile Justice Code (Sections 13–14) 
[Note: The bill would make the same changes with 
respect to access to files in the Juvenile Justice Code as in 
the CINC Code, described previously in Sections 8–10 of this 
Supplemental Note.]
Background
The bill was introduced by the Senate Committee on 
Judiciary at the request of Senator Baumgardner. 
Senate Committee on Judiciary 
In the Senate Committee hearing on February 16, 2023, 
Senator Masterson testified as a proponent of the bill, stating 
that the bill would provide independent oversight to an 
essential government function. Proponent testimony was also 
provided by representatives of Kansas Appleseed and 
Children’s Alliance of Kansas, who generally were in favor of 
the establishment of an independent office of the Child 
Advocate but offered some amendments to assist in 
operations of the OCA. 
15- 232 The Senate Committee recommended a substitute bill 
be passed incorporating amendments to: 
●Expand the definition of a child; 
●Lengthen the term of the Child Advocate to five 
years and to provide for a successor to be selected 
prior to the incumbent vacating the position; 
●Provide legal authority for OCA operations; 
●Clarify the purpose of the OCA; 
●Require the OCA to resolve complaints; 
●Expand the complaints to be investigated to 
include inadequate protection by the OCA; 
●Enhance the procedures required of the OCA; 
●Add reporting responsibilities of the OCA; 
●Expand the affected parties list who are protected 
from retaliatory actions to include an employee of 
DCF contracting agencies; 
●Expand the disclosure of information 
responsibilities of the OCA; 
●Add clarification that the OCA is an independent 
agency; 
●Add orders granting custody for adoption to the 
jurisdiction of ICWA; 
●Add provisions regarding orders granting custody 
for adoption proceedings; and 
●Add an appeals process for a placement of a child.
16- 232 Fiscal Information 
According to the fiscal note prepared by the Division of 
the Budget on the bill, as introduced, the Office of the 
Attorney General states that its Abuse, Neglect, and 
Exploitation (ANE) Unit would be required to file findings of 
fact or conclusions of law regarding the complaints and assist 
in investigations of child abuse. Because of these 
requirements, the agency would require $887,556 from the 
State General Fund for FY 2024 for 3.00 FTE Attorney 
positions, 3.00 FTE Investigator positions, and 4.00 FTE 
Program Consultant positions along with related operating 
expenditures for the positions. Of the total, salary and 
benefits would be $818,544 and operating expenditures 
would be $69,012.
According to KDADS, enactment of the bill would require 
the agency to have a dedicated staff to research, track down, 
and timely respond to complaint inquiries received from the 
OCA regarding children who have crossed over from DCF 
into KDADS licensed facilities or have been placed by a court 
into KDADS’ custody for care and treatment. The agency 
estimates that starting in FY 2024 it would need 1.00 FTE 
position for these purposes at a cost of $93,000 from the 
State General Fund annually for salaries and wages, 
including fringe benefits.
The Judicial Branch indicates that the bill could increase 
the number of cases filed in district courts because it creates 
a new crime, which would in turn increase the time spent by 
judicial and nonjudicial personnel in processing, researching, 
and hearing cases. Since the crime carries a misdemeanor 
penalty, there could also be more supervision of offenders by 
court services officers. In addition, the bill could result in the 
collection of docket fees, fines, and supervision fees that 
would be deposited into the State General Fund.
According to the Kansas Department of Education, 
enactment of the bill would not have a fiscal effect on school 
districts. The Kansas Bureau of Investigation, the Kansas 
17- 232 Highway Patrol, DCF, and KDOC report that enactment of the 
bill would have no fiscal effect on their agencies. The Kansas 
Department of Health and Environment indicates that 
enactment of the bill would have no direct effect on the 
agency as any requests for data or records would be handled 
from within existing resources. Any fiscal effect associated 
with the bill is not reflected in The FY 2024 Governor’s 
Budget Report.
According to the Kansas Association of Counties, the bill 
could have a fiscal effect on counties depending on how often 
county law enforcement and prosecutors would work with the 
OCA, but a precise fiscal effect cannot be estimated. 
The League of Kansas Municipalities indicates that 
enactment of the bill could have a negligible fiscal effect on 
Kansas cities.
Child Advocate Act; Office of the Child Advocate; Revised Kansas Code for Care of 
Children; appeal; children and minors; parental rights termination; adoption
18- 232