Requiring a person convicted of an offense that resulted in the incapacitation or death of a victim who is the parent or guardian of a minor child to pay restitution in the form of child support and increasing the criminal penalties for repeat violations of a protective order.
Impact
The implications of SB265 are significant, as they strengthen protective measures for victims of domestic violence and other crimes. By increasing penalties for repeat violations of protective orders, the bill aims to deter offenders and enhance victim safety. This change could potentially lead to a decrease in incidents of domestic violence and offer crucial financial support for minor children left without a primary caregiver due to a crime. The requirement for restitution aligns the justice system more closely with the needs of families impacted by such offenses, highlighting a focus on the welfare of children.
Summary
Senate Bill 265 aims to enhance the criminal consequences for individuals who violate protective orders, specifically targeting repeat offenders. The bill modifies existing Kansas statutes to classify such violations more severely, categorizing them as felonies upon second or subsequent offenses. Additionally, it mandates that individuals convicted of offenses resulting in the incapacitation or death of a victim who is a parent or guardian of a minor child must pay restitution in the form of child support, providing a means to support the affected minor while addressing the financial responsibilities of the offender.
Contention
Though the bill passed unanimously in the Senate, discussions around its introduction revealed differing opinions on the extent of punitive measures. Advocates for the bill stressed the necessity of making protective orders more enforceable and the importance of holding offenders accountable through stringent penalties. However, some opponents raised concerns about the potential for over-criminalization and stressed the need for comprehensive support systems for victims rather than just punitive approaches. Balancing victim protection with appropriate correctional measures remains a point of contention among lawmakers.
Requiring a person convicted of an offense that resulted in the incapacitation or death of a victim who is the parent or guardian of a minor child to pay restitution in the form of child support.
Requiring a person convicted of an offense that resulted in the incapacitation or death of a victim who is the parent or guardian of a minor child to pay restitution in the form of child support.
Requiring a person convicted of driving under the influence to pay child support for any child of a person killed during the offense giving rise to such conviction.
Authorizing judges to commit juvenile offenders to detention for technical violations of probation, increasing the cumulative detention limit for juvenile offenders and increasing criminal penalties for juvenile offenders who use a firearm in the commission of an offense or who are repeat offenders.
Requiring a person convicted of involuntary manslaughter while driving under the influence to pay child support for any child of a person killed during the offense.
Increasing the time of an initial restraining order and possible extensions issued in a protection from abuse order or a protection from stalking, sexual assault or human trafficking order.