Kansas Senate Bill SB547

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/13/24
• Refer: 3/14/24
• Failed: 4/30/24

Caption

Amending the Kansas pet animal act to require the Kansas department of agriculture to maintain records of inspections for not less than five years and removing the requirement that the commissioner only apply federal rules and regulations to United States department of agriculture licensed animal distributors and animal breeders.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts state laws by enhancing compliance measures for pet animal care. It introduces more stringent regulations governing the operations of shelters and kennels, including provisions for closing inspections when a licensee ceases business. These updates are designed to ensure that animal welfare standards are upheld and that facilities maintain adequate conditions for animals. This could result in improved care for animals in shelters, but could also impose heavier operational burdens on smaller shelters and kennels seeking compliance.

Summary

Senate Bill 547 aims to amend the Kansas Pet Animal Act by updating licensing protocols and enhancing regulations concerning the care and treatment of pet animals. The bill modifies definitions related to the operation of animal shelters and pounds, and introduces provisions for stricter licensing requirements. It mandates the Kansas Department of Agriculture to keep detailed records of inspections for not less than five years and eliminates prior constraints that required the application of only federal rules to certain licensed animal distributors and breeders. The changes aim to increase the level of oversight in animal welfare practices across the state.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 547 include concerns about the financial implications for smaller facilities that may struggle to meet the increased fees and operational regulations. Opponents argue that while the intent to improve animal welfare is commendable, the associated costs and complex regulations could lead to unintended closures of smaller-scale operations, thereby potentially reducing the overall number of facilities available for animal rescue and care. Proponents, on the other hand, affirm that these changes are necessary to protect animal welfare and to create a more unified and enforceable framework across the state.