Kansas Senate Bill SB130

Kansas 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/25
• Refer: 1/31/25
• Refer: 2/20/25
• Refer: 2/25/25

Caption

Amending the Kansas pet animal act to require the Kansas department of agriculture to maintain records of inspections for not less than five years and removing the requirement that the commissioner only apply federal rules and regulations to United States department of agriculture licensed animal distributors and animal breeders.

Impact

The new provisions within SB130 emphasize the necessity of compliance with humane treatment of animals, directly addressing existing gaps in the current regulations. For instance, the bill increases certain license fees and outlines procedures for the inspection process of animal shelters. The incorporation of immediate actions that the commissioner can take to protect public welfare in cases of severe negligence or cruelty represents a significant step forward in ensuring the health and safety of the animals housed in these facilities.

Summary

Senate Bill 130 updates various provisions of the Kansas Pet Animal Act, primarily to ensure better regulation of animal shelters and the treatment of pets. The bill allows for changes in the definitions surrounding animal handling, including more precise criteria for what constitutes adequate care. It mandates that any person intending to operate an animal shelter or similar establishment must obtain a license from the commissioner of agriculture. Additionally, the bill requires those who hold licenses to maintain a minimum standard of care for the animals, including adequate feeding, watering, and veterinary care.

Contention

There have been discussions regarding the licensing requirements and fees, with concerns raised about how these may impact small shelters or rescue organizations. Some stakeholders argue that increased financial burdens may limit their ability to operate effectively and provide necessary care for abandoned or at-risk animals. Furthermore, the stipulations regarding penalties for non-compliance, such as the revocation of licenses and additional inspection fees, have sparked debate among animal rights advocates and those involved in animal care services. Nonetheless, proponents assert that these measures will enhance the overall welfare of animals in the state.