Requiring legislative approval prior to any state agency seeking or implementing a public assistance program waiver or other authorization from the federal government that expands eligibility for any public assistance program or increases cost to the state or making certain changes in services for persons with intellectual or developmental disabilities.
Impact
If enacted, SB161 would effectively limit the ability of state agencies to unilaterally expand public assistance programs, thereby ensuring that any changes are reviewed and approved through the legislative process. This could result in a more cautious approach to expanding public services, with the potential for reduced responsiveness to the needs of constituents, as agencies would need to navigate legislative approval, which could be influenced by political considerations. Additionally, the bill specifies that any public assistance program amendments already being implemented before the effective date would not be affected, maintaining continuity for existing programs.
Summary
Senate Bill 161 aims to strengthen legislative oversight over public assistance programs by requiring that any state agency seeking to implement a federal waiver or authorization—which would expand eligibility for these programs or increase costs to the state—must first obtain explicit consent from the legislature. This requirement, set to take effect on July 1, 2025, marks a significant shift in how public assistance initiatives are managed in Kansas, placing greater authority in the hands of elected lawmakers, rather than state administrators.
Contention
There may be points of contention surrounding this bill, particularly regarding the balance of power between state agencies and the legislature. Proponents may argue that increased legislative oversight is necessary to prevent unnecessary expansions of government spending and ensure accountability. In contrast, opponents could raise concerns that such restrictions might hinder the ability of state agencies to respond quickly to the changing needs of the population, especially in times of crisis or when federal assistance opportunities arise. The discussions may also reflect broader ideological divides concerning the role of government in providing social services.
Requiring job search instead of a 20-hour work week for child care subsidy eligibility, allowing food assistance funds for advertising food assistance programs and modifying penalties for non-cooperation for all assistance programs.
Requiring custodial and non-custodial parents to cooperate with child support enforcement programs for food assistance eligibility and disqualifying such parents from food assistance for being delinquent in support payments.
Expanding the scope of the inspector general to audit and investigate all state cash, food or health assistance programs and granting the inspector general the power to subpoena, administer oaths and execute search warrants thereto.
Directing the secretary for children and families to request a waiver from supplemental nutrition assistance program rules and prohibit the purchase of candy and soft drinks with food assistance.
Requiring the university of Kansas hospital authority to have prior approval from the legislature or the legislative coordinating council when the legislature is not is session, when purchasing, leasing, trading, exchanging or otherwise acquiring, constructing, repair, remodeling or renovating any real property or facility outside of the state of Kansas.