Kentucky 2022 Regular Session

Kentucky House Bill HB239

Introduced
1/7/22  
Refer
1/7/22  
Refer
2/16/22  
Report Pass
2/23/22  
Engrossed
3/1/22  
Refer
3/1/22  
Refer
3/8/22  
Report Pass
3/23/22  
Enrolled
3/29/22  
Enrolled
3/29/22  
Chaptered
4/8/22  

Caption

AN ACT relating to local government and making an appropriation therefor.

Impact

The implications of HB 239 primarily affect the statutory powers of constables. The requirement for newly elected constables to complete a basic training course and to maintain certification is enforced, ensuring that they meet established standards to perform their duties effectively. This is expected to enhance the professionalization of the office, potentially leading to better oversight and reduction of arbitrary use of power. Supporters assert that the bill will ensure that only qualified individuals can hold significant law enforcement authority, thus improving public safety and trust in local governance.

Summary

House Bill 239 pertains to the roles and responsibilities associated with the office of constable and deputy constable in Kentucky. It introduces modifications to the duties of constables, particularly those elected or appointed after January 1, 2023, by limiting the general powers traditionally held by peace officers in their roles. Instead, these newly elected constables will have only the specific powers enumerated within the bill, which include executing legal processes and serving subpoenas, among others. The core intention of the bill is to delineate clearer boundaries regarding the authority of constables in relation to local law enforcement.

Sentiment

The reception of HB 239 is mixed, reflecting a polarized sentiment among public officials and the community. Proponents, including certain law enforcement entities, generally support the bill for its goal of increasing accountability and ensuring that constables receive adequate training. However, there are concerns voiced by local government advocates regarding the degree of authority taken away from constables, suggesting that the modifications may hinder their effectiveness in serving the community. Opponents argue that this bill could place redundancy in local law enforcement operations or create unnecessary barriers for constables looking to serve their constituents.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding the bill is the debate on the balance between necessary oversight and the autonomy of local law enforcement. Some argue that limiting the powers of constables is essential for accountability and safety, while others warn that it undermines the ability of elected constables to respond to community needs effectively. The bill's requirement for training and certification raises questions about accessibility and the resources available to ensure that all potential constables can meet these new standards, which may pose barriers to individuals in lower-income communities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

KY SB278

AN ACT relating to constables and declaring an emergency.

KY HB155

AN ACT relating to constables.

KY SB353

AN ACT relating to constables.

NV SB381

Revises provisions relating to governmental administration. (BDR 20-1076)

KY SB101

AN ACT relating to peace officer contracts.

LA HB1440

Provides relative to the first and second city courts of New Orleans

NJ S2341

Eliminates position of constable; removes statutory references to constable; repeals various parts of statutory law; implements recommendation of SCI report concerning elimination of constables.

NJ A5281

Eliminates position of constable; removes statutory references to constable; repeals various parts of statutory law; implements recommendation of SCI report concerning elimination of constables.